News ONLY Columbus Center Thread

Are you sick of the CC thread and want a news only thread on the topic?

  • Yes, the thread is out of control

    Votes: 24 61.5%
  • No, I love arguing without a foreseeable end

    Votes: 9 23.1%
  • I don't care

    Votes: 6 15.4%

  • Total voters
    39
Re: Columbus Center

Columbus Center a curse - and a cause
Amid funding woes, political flap, developer Arthur Winn presses on
By Casey Ross
Globe Staff / March 29, 2009


During his down moments, Arthur Winn curses the day he conceived of Columbus Center.

Over the past 12 years, he has run a political gantlet trying to build it, straining to sculpt a plan to unite two of Boston's most exclusive neighborhoods with a towering complex over the Massachusetts Turnpike.

He visited with neighbors and city officials. He battled through more than 120 community meetings. He hired top-flight lobbyists to secure public money from the mayor, lawmakers, and two governors. At one point, his efforts even reached the Bush White House.

But lately, Winn, one of the nation's most successful developers of affordable housing, has found only controversy and misfortune in Columbus Center, with its troubles often plunging him into bouts of introspection. When asked about his reasons for wanting to build it, Winn spoke not about the project's mission or profit, but about his state of mind.

"I would have to be lying on a couch to give you an appropriate answer," he said.

"I had a chance years and years ago to buy the Celtics. I probably should have. And all these years later, I had a chance to build what I thought was the most exciting job in the history of Boston. Certainly, I didn't want to lose money on it, but maybe making money was not the first priority."

Winn's campaign for Columbus Center has fed a political drama that is remarkable even for Boston, where development is something of a blood sport. The project had high-powered enemies, including former House Speaker Sal DiMasi, who used his leverage to repeatedly block Winn's attempts to get public funding.

Although DiMasi left Winn damaged, it was Winn's friends and unfortunate timing that hurt Columbus Center the most. He got backing from governors Deval Patrick and Mitt Romney, but they proved unwilling to help at critical moments.

And then came the debacle with a former state senator, Dianne Wilkerson, a top supporter whose arrest on bribery charges has made her one of the project's most visible liabilities.

The controversy has left Winn fighting to preserve his reputation. It has also left him trying to rescue a project that has become a political taboo, incapable of attracting a supporter who will defend it in the light of day.

"There is nobody in the city who picks up the phone and says, 'Before you step up against this, know I'm going to smack you if you do,' " Winn said.

"They say it in New York. In Boston, it's an intellectual exercise between governing and insanity. There are so many different currents of motivation."

With Columbus Center, Winn proposes a 35-story condominium tower, stores, and hotel on 7 acres between Arlington and Clarendon streets. The $810 million project would connect Boston's Back Bay and South End neighborhoods over the open scar of the turnpike.

Wilkerson was the project's chief supporter in the Legislature, saying it offered the promise of thousands of jobs for her constituents. Winn said she was a longtime friend whose support was welcome, until the day of her arrest.

The former Roxbury senator was accused in October of accepting $23,500 in bribes associated with a nightclub and a development site in Roxbury. None of the charges were related to Columbus Center, but Winn was among the executives and officials who received subpoenas.

A few months later, Winn acknowledged he was one of a number of supporters who gave her money to pay off a large federal tax debt. His gift was $10,000; it came 22 months before Wilkerson sought $4.3 million for Columbus Center in the Legislature.

Winn has vehemently defended the donation, saying he gave it because he wanted to help a friend in trouble, not because he wanted to influence the public process surrounding Columbus Center. "There was never a quid pro quo between Dianne and me," he said.

Well before the Wilkerson controversy, however, Winn was struggling to get the project off the ground.

Between 2003 and 2007, its price tag doubled, to about $800 million, causing Winn to launch a lobbying blitz to secure millions of dollars in public subsidies. His main targets were economic development officials in the Romney and Patrick administrations.

"Arthur was all over the agencies. He was asking for substantial amounts of money," said Douglas Foy, who was secretary of Commonwealth development under Romney. "Our response was that he was welcome to apply for any help, but his requests were well beyond the normal operating boundaries of our grant programs."

The requests included $6 million from the Executive Office of Transportation; $15 million from the Department of Housing and Community Development; and $15 million in low-cost loans from the Massachusetts Housing and Finance Agency, according to public records.

The lobbying prompted Romney on Nov. 2, 2004, to file a letter with the state Ethics Commission because Winn was such a big political supporter - donating along with his relatives more than $46,000 to Massachusetts Republican committees during Romney's tenure.

The governor's ethics disclosure stated that Romney would play no role in reviewing Winn's funding requests. Such disclosures are filed to protect against conflict-of-interest allegations.

Still, at one point Romney made a high-level intervention on Winn's behalf: The governor called Andrew Card, then chief of staff to President George W. Bush, to press Winn's case for financial assistance from the US Department of Housing and Urban Development and from the government-chartered mortgage giant Fannie Mae, according a handwritten memo about the call that was filed in state housing records.

"Mitt called Card who called HUD to get FNMA [Fannie Mae] to stand by for Columbus Center," stated the memo, which the Globe obtained through a public records request. It is unclear from the memo when the call was made.

Romney said through a spokesman that he did not recall making the call. Card did not respond to requests for comment.

Columbus Center did receive $32.5 million in tax-exempt bonds from HUD, but nothing from Fannie Mae. And despite Romney's support, Winn only got $2 million from the Massachusetts housing agency.

A lifelong Republican, Winn initially fared better with the next governor, Democrat Deval Patrick, who is still in office. The Patrick administration approved a $20 million package of grants for Columbus Center that allowed Winn to begin construction in October 2007.

But the global credit crunch promptly undid that. Negotiations with Winn's primary lender, Anglo Irish Bank, collapsed, leaving him without a needed $430 million loan, and forcing Winn and his investment partner, the California state pension fund, to halt construction in March 2008. Weeks later, Patrick withdrew the state funding.

The project's management was trying to regroup in October when news broke of Wilkerson's arrest, leading to the subpoena, the ethical cloud, and more delays.

Today, Winn is a minority partner in Columbus Center, with a marginal role in the decision-making. The pension fund and its real estate consultants are now in charge of the project's finances.

Still, Winn said he intends to protect his $40 million investment and will continue to advocate for the project's construction.

"Whatever happens, I think for Boston the project should be completed for many reasons. It's so clear what the upsides are," Winn said, his voice rising. "I've been at this [expletive] for 11 years. I sunk a lot of time and effort in it, and I'd hate to see it die for many, many reasons, not the least of which is ego. But that's just no reason to go into a deal."


Link
 
Re: Columbus Center

[size=+2]After big plans, all quiet at Columbus Center[/size]
Boston Herald ? 8 April 2009 ? By Thomas Grillo

The team hired to breathe new life into Columbus Center has missed another deadline.

Beal Cos. of Boston and Related Properties in New York promised they would complete a six-week review of the project?s finances to determine whether the stalled $850 million development could resume. But the latest target date expires today.

?No one from Beal has talked to me in months,? said state Rep. Bryon Rushing, a Roxbury Democrat. ?I have no idea what?s going on.?

Construction was halted last year on the 1.3 million-square-foot proposal, which includes a 35-story glass tower and four 11-story buildings to be built on a 7-acre deck over the Massachusetts Turnpike near the Back Bay MBTA station.

But problems over funding plagued the massive development as construction costs soared and financial backers and government grants evaporated. The developer recently forfeited $32.2 million in Empowerment Zone bond funding.

An abandoned construction site is the only evidence of the project.

Columbus Center?s owner ? California Urban Investment Partners-Winn Columbus Center LLC Development ? hired Beal and Related last year as consultants. But the new team has been unable to deliver.

In an e-mail to neighborhood activists in January, a Beal spokeswoman promised an update in 90 days.

John Herbert, a member of the Ellis Neighborhood Association, said he would like answers. ?We?ve been worn down by this project. It?s been going on for so long,? he said.

A spokeswoman for the developer said there are no updates at this time.

http://www.bostonherald.com/business/general/view.bg?articleid=1164230
 
Re: Columbus Center

[size=+2]Pike Angry at Developers[/size]

Boston Herald ? 24 April 2009 ? by Tom Grillo

The Massachusetts Turnpike Authority is losing patience with the Columbus Center developers.

Alan LeBovidge, the Pike?s executive director, said he has asked the developers to remove Jersey barriers along the Pike extension, but has not gotten a satisfactory response.

?They asked for an extension until after Easter, but that was two weeks ago and we haven?t heard anything,? he said. ?We will take appropriate action including a lawsuit if that?s necessary.?

The barriers were needed during Columbus Center?s construction phase, but work was halted last year. The barriers are the latest problem for the development, as construction costs soared and financial backers disappeared.

Beal Cos. of Boston and Related Properties in New York are the consultants on the $850 million project.

A Beal spokeswoman said the team has made progress on the cleanup of the site, but did not have information about the Jersey barriers.

http://www.bostonherald.com/business/general/view.bg?articleid=1167690
 
Anybody agree this thread has jumped the shark and a seperate, locked thread needs to be made? I just want NEWS!!!
 
I have to make my lawyer pitch here... the original thread won't disappear! This is just to vote for a seperate thread containing only news. Who has time to sift through all those argumentive posts! Agree or disagree with them, Who has time?!? I don't really
 
I'll be honest, I stopped reading CC a LONG time ago. I would love a news only thread.
 
I voted for keeping it status quo - I like the debate, I always like a good fight

As for having the time, I don't read it when i have no time and it takes a matter of seconds to click through.
 
Nice push poll. ;)

It's really not that hard to scroll past all of Ned's posts ... I've been doing it for months.
 
I find it tempting to read the BS posts. Its hard to avoid them. Plus, I'm lazy and my internet connect is slow so sifting through pages takes time. Come on people you know you hate that thread!
 
Re: Columbus Center

[size=+2]Pike slammed for putting off air-rights plan[/size]
Boston Herald ? June 5, 2009 ? By Thomas Grillo

The Massachusetts Turnpike Authority has shelved a planned air-rights project near the Prudential Center that could net the cash-starved agency millions in leasing fees.

Pike officials have told the Boston Redevelopment Authority that it does not expect to select a developer anytime soon for Parcels 12-15 straddling Boston?s Back Bay and Fenway neighborhoods.

City Council President Michael Ross blasted the agency for the decision. ?The developers should be given a chance to present their vision to the community and fill a gaping hole in the neighborhood,? he said. ?The Turnpike doesn?t have any money; why would they miss a chance to earn some??

In December, four developers offered competing plans, from housing to offices, that would transform a section of Boylston Street and Massachusetts Avenue and fill the space above the east-west highway.

At the time, the agency said the proposals offer opportunities to ?fill in gaps over the turnpike and create stronger connections between the Pru, the Back Bay, Fenway, Kenmore Square and Massachusetts Avenue corridor.?

Carpenter & Co. proposed a 200-room hotel and office tower. The Chiofaro Co. pitched a 25-story office building. Weiner Ventures offered a 40-story tower with office and housing. And Trinity Financial was willing to build 546 units of housing in a pair of buildings at 11 and 14 stories.

But the Pike?s real estate projects appear to be in flux with the recent layoff of Stephen Hines, its chief development officer, and Shirin Karanfiloglu, a planner.

Jeffrey B. Mullan, the Turnpike?s executive director, did not return calls seeking comment yesterday.

Patrick Lee, principal at Trinity, said he wants to know how long the project will be delayed. ?There?s an opportunity to build support for this project within the community now,? he said. ?Having it ready to go when the economy turns is in the public?s interest.?
 
Re: Columbus Center

[size=+2]Developers Say ?Nobody Home? At Turnpike Real Estate Division[/size]

By Banker & Tradesman Staff Writer Paul McMorrow ? June 4, 2009

Chaos and understaffing at the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority has left at least two major Boston development initiatives stuck in the mud, sources tell Banker & Tradesman, as crushing debt, political infighting and a personnel exodus have caused the agency to suspend virtually all major real estate decisions.

"They're in complete turmoil," said one development source. "There's nobody home."

"Nothing is happening at all," said another, complaining that development bids from Faneuil Hall to the Back Bay have ground to a halt. "They don't have anybody in place. Nobody's in there to make things move."

In the span of one week in early May, the Pike laid off its chief development officer and most of its real estate support staff, and saw its executive director resign amid a firestorm of criticism. Since then, many in Boston's development community complain they've heard nothing but silence from the agency.

In mid-January, the agency announced a dramatic plan to sell off its 11 roadside service plazas. The four bidders chasing those properties are still waiting for word of their fate.

In announcing the service plaza sale, transportation secretary James Aloisi pledged to move quickly to "dismantle" the Pike. He said that, as a manifestation of that commitment, he would dispose of the plazas "in a matter of a couple months," adding, ""We want it expedited. We don't want it to linger."

That haste seems to have waned. Boston Mayor Thomas Menino recently told Banker & Tradesman that Aloisi informed him that all major real estate decisions are on hold. Aloisi told Menino that the Pike wouldn't be pulling the trigger on any major real estate leases or designations until Governor Deval Patrick and the Legislature come to an agreement on the troubled agency's future.

"They're going through a reorganization," Menino said, referring to the transportation consolidation bill that's currently stalled in a legislative conference committee. "Once it's completed, they'll move forward. Jim Aloisi said to me, ?Why start the [development] process and not finish it up?'"

An Aloisi spokesman denied that account, saying, "Nothing is on hold."

Other Mass. Delays

The Pike had also been expected to tap a developer for a long-vacant parcel along the Rose Kennedy Greenway in mid-April; a long-delayed request for proposals on the parcel finally went out last October, and bidders are still waiting for the Pike to name a winner.

Bids on a series of Pike air rights parcels in the Back Bay were delivered to the agency in early December, and over the past six months, the development process for those properties has gone no further.

"I'm hearing [the air rights development] is stalled," said city council president Michael Ross. "It's unfortunate. If done correctly, air rights development has the potential to reconnect neighborhoods and bring vitality to otherwise-dead spots. Good planning takes place during a down economy. We should be preparing today for Boston to come out of this. If we don't use this time wisely, other cities will, and we will lose."

In the wake of May's mass layoffs, the Pike is operating with a skeletal real estate staff. All operations are being funneled into the Executive Office of Transportation, which is also handling all real estate planning for MassHighway and the MBTA.

The planned consolidation of the Pike, MassHighway and the T has been hampered, though, by bitter conflict between Aloisi, Patrick, and Senate President Therese Murray. Aloisi has repeatedly thrown barbs Murray's way, and the Senate president has reciprocated by savaging Aloisi and his boss in the press.

Murray and the governor are also warring over how to pay for the state's overwhelming transportation bills. Patrick has pushed a 19-cent gas tax increase, which the House and Senate rejected in favor of a 25-percent sales tax hike. The governor promptly threatened to veto that hike, raising the prospect of massive Pike toll increases this summer. A failure to resolve the impasse will likely junk the Pike's bond rating and trigger costly swaption contracts.

The calendar is also working against the reorganization that Aloisi is reportedly subjugating his real estate processes to. On Beacon Hill, legislators traditionally devote nearly all of their springtime work hours to passing a budget before retiring from the Hill for the summer. The current legislative session has been marked by fewer formal sessions and poorer committee attendance than usual, and those two trends don't bode well for the prospect of conference committees working overtime.

http://www.bankerandtradesman.com/news133226.html
 
Re: Columbus Center

[size=+2]State pushes a wave of construction[/size]

[size=+1]Public outlays could spur private projects[/size]

By Casey Ross ? Globe Staff ? June 18, 2009

Governor Deval Patrick?s administration will spend hundreds of millions of dollars this summer building roads and highway ramps for at least five struggling private developments - from the former Naval air station in Weymouth to Somerville?s Assembly Square - in hopes of jump-starting construction and the local economy.

The money, a combination of federal stimulus money and state funds, will not go directly to the private developers, but rather for public works that Patrick aides said they expect will make it easier for companies to arrange financing in otherwise tight credit markets. That, in turn, would kick off construction of the planned office parks, shopping centers, housing, and hotels that will create new jobs.

Although more projects may be chosen later, the ones already approved include not only SouthField in Weymouth and Assembly Square, but a new business park in Fall River that will recruit biotech companies, the Westwood Station project, and Waterfront Square at Revere Beach.

The state?s immediate goal is to start work in the current construction season, with the first five projects receiving $20 million to $60 million in public works improvements. Patrick officials expect to officially announce the funding commitments over the coming weeks.

?The projects we will be announcing will change the way we grow and develop over the next 10 years,?? said Gregory Bialecki, the Massachusetts secretary of housing and economic development. ?What we?re trying to do is create the places that will be our new employment centers.??

The federal funds will come out of an $800 million allotment for transportation projects Massachusetts received from the stimulus package.

Initially the Patrick administration used some of that federal money for simple projects such as road paving. But it now wants to target improvements that have the ancillary benefit of creating additional economic growth.

?Now, we?re able to look over the horizon and go after the big picture things we?re trying to do,?? Bialecki said.

In Somerville, Mayor Joseph Curtatone called the selection of the Assembly Square project a major benefit for his city, which like many communities is struggling to fund public services with less money.

?This project will do a lot to stabilize our future,?? Curtatone said of the proposed development. ?It will allow us to invest in education, public works and public safety. It?s the most important project in the city.??

The state is still sorting through the list of projects that have applied for public aid, and more may be added in the coming months.

But Bialecki indicated several high-profile stalled developments have needs the state cannot accommodate.

One is Columbus Center, an $800 million condominium, hotel, and retail project over the turnpike in Boston that has been unable to arrange private financing.

Another request that is too large to fill came from Gale International and Vornado Realty Trust, developers of the Filene?s block in Downtown Crossing, which Bialecki said were looking for as much as $300 million in assistance.

Neither set of developers returned calls seeking comment.


In downturns in the early 1990s and 2001, Massachusetts lagged the national economy in its recovery, taking months longer to restore jobs and production lost during the contraction.

The new spending initiative is an attempt to reverse that trend, although it is unclear just how quickly some of these private developments can get underway and contribute to the economy.

The five projects chosen so far are all ambitious:

■ The Assembly Square project in Somerville includes retail stores such as Ikea, office buildings, and more than 2,000 residential units.

■ The former South Weymouth Naval Air Station would become SouthField, a minicity with more than 2,800 housing units, golf course, stores, offices, and movie studios. State officials are arranging financing to build an access road that would connect the development with routes 3 and 18 and cost about $60 million.

■ At Waterfront Square at Revere Beach, Eurovest Development is planning to build a $500 million mixed use project that would include more than 900 housing units, a hotel, and 200,000 square feet of stores, restaurants, and offices. The state is considering upgrades to the MBTA?s Wonderland Station as well as the network of roads around it.

■ For Fall River, the state will build an off-ramp from Route 24 that would allow officials to add new space next to the city?s 500-acre Industrial Park for biotech companies.

■ The $1.5 billion Westwood Station project includes hundreds of housing units, retail stores, and offices on a large site opposite the Route 128 Amtrak station. The developers want help building a new highway interchange at interstates 95 and 93 that would improve traffic flow around the project, which is projected to create about 3,700 construction jobs and as many as 9,000 permanent jobs.

?We have one or two critical tenants that are still waiting to see what happens with the road system. And if these commitments come through, we can get financing to move the project forward soon,?? said Jay Doherty, chief executive of developer Cabot, Cabot & Forbes.

http://www.boston.com/business/arti...projects_targeted_for_stimulus_aid/?page=full
 
Re: Columbus Center

[size=+2]Turnpike's Development Blunders Boggling[/size]

Banker & Tradesman ? By Columnist Scott Van Voorhis ? June 15, 2009

-----From the folks that gave us the Big Dig, here?s another costly screw up: the $500 million airrights fiasco.
-----That was the Massachusetts Turnpike?s estimate more than a decade ago of what it could reap from the development of the air-rights over the highway?s Boston span, which slices through such real estate hot spots as the Back Bay and Fenway.
-----But pretty much nothing got built, leaving the rest of us across the state to bail out the floundering state authority, drowning in billions in Big Dig debt, with ever-higher tolls.
-----The city of Boston came out of this empty handed as well, losing out on the potential for tens of millions in new taxes from millions of square feet of new air-rights development that never materialized.

All The Wrong Moves

-----The story of what went wrong is a case study in state bureaucratic arrogance and a penchant for making all the wrong real estate moves ? over and over again.
-----But if that were not bad enough, the embattled Turnpike, after laying off its real estate chief and his assistant for good measure, appears determined to pursue a downsized version of its already discredited air-rights development strategy.
-----It?s time to apply a little common sense to this government orchestrated-mess.
-----?There really was no coordinated methodical strategy for these sites,? notes David Begelfer, chief executive of NAIOP Massachusetts. ?It was back-ended. They figured, ?We need money. This is one way to get it.??
-----James Kerasiotes, the Turnpike and Big Dig czar who got dumped in 2000 after, among other things, calling the head of another state agency a ?reptile? in an interview with The Wall Street Journal, was sure one abrasive guy.
-----But one thing Kerasiotes got right was his belief that the air-rights over the highway?s Boston span were a potential gold mine. Now it?s a fair question whether Kerasiotes was padding the numbers here a bit ? the $500 million was based on 14 million square feet of new development.
-----Yet even two thirds of that ? $300 million ? would make a big difference right now.
-----The same is true for all the potential tax revenue that cash-strapped Boston never saw.
-----Just take Columbus Center, local housing developer Arthur Winn?s ill-fated plan to build a condo and hotel high-rise complex on a deck over the Turnpike near the Hancock Tower.
-----That project, which has been delayed for years and may now never happen, has the potential to produce a cool $4 million to $5 million a year in new city taxes. That?s a lot of teachers and firefighters. It?s still a lot even after you subtract for a planned tax break to spur construction.
-----But the Turnpike managed to take what should have been a home run for its own troubled balance sheet and for the city of Boston and run it into the ground.
-----The setbacks have been so thorough as to discredit the idea of air-rights development in a city that boasts a pair of landmark projects built over this very same highway, the Prudential Center and Copley Place.

No One To Take The Call

-----But possibly the Turnpike?s biggest problem has been its unwillingness to devote the kind of attention ? and resources ? needed to oversee the development of millions of square feet of new development.
-----The cash strapped authority, until recently, delegated the brunt of this monumental task to a single real estate executive, his assistant and two other staffers. (The director and his assistant, half the department, were recently let go).
-----Unable to handle this massive workload, the Turnpike?s harried real estate duo were constantly juggling different projects ? and too often making the wrong choices.
-----Back when housing was hot, the state authority strung along an array of developers eager to bid on Turnpike-controlled sites near North Station.
-----Instead, then-Turnpike chief Matt Amorello rolled out a ludicrous plan to build one of Boston?s tallest office towers at South Bay.
Amorello had dreams of netting as much as $200 million for a mix of land- and air-rights parcels near the highway interchange off Kneeland Street by South Station.
-----The lucky bidder, as the Turnpike?s pitch went, would then have a shot at building one of the city?s tallest towers and a new, multibillion-dollar neighborhood.
-----There were a couple tiny little problems with this, though. One was the smokestack bedecked steam plant that overshadows the site. The second was the Turnpike?s insistence of a big, upfront cash payment for a development site that could take years ? or decades ? to build out.
-----Begelfer, the NAIOP Massachusetts chief, remembers trying to talk some sense into the Turnpike crew. He urged the authority to focus on its parcels near North Station where there was lively interest from potential bidders ? to no avail.
-----?Their response was, ?We are doing just fine,?? Begelfer recalls.
-----The Turnpike ended up with just one bidder, a local builder who amazingly had never attempted a major high-rise, let alone a multibillion-dollar mega-development.

Did Someone Say ?Change??

-----Amorello is long gone, of course.
-----And there are even some hopeful signs that change may be on the way.
-----The Patrick administration has just delegated Peter O?Connor, a deputy secretary for real estate and economic development at the Executive Office of Transportation, to help revive the Turnpike?s faltering air-rights.
-----?I agree with you completely,? O?Connor said of my assessment of the Turnpike?s dismal history in the air-rights business. ?The way I put it, you guys have deals papered from the Zakim Bridge to Brighton, but no one has built anything. Clearly, whatever construct you were using didn?t work.?
-----Amen to that.
-----Still, there?s also a danger of history repeating itself as harried state officials like O?Connor are forced to play triage and decide which projects to spend time on, and which to put on the back burner.
-----Just look at the mixed signals being given to a group of deep-pocketed developers, a who?s who of Boston real estate dealmakers, who are lobbying for the chance to bid on a series of air-rights parcels not far from the Hynes Convention Center in the Back Bay.
-----O?Connor says he plans to meet with these developers, who submitted bids in December, and evaluate whether they are still interested. He holds out the option of a six month breather.
-----Maybe it will all work out ? O?Connor has a long background in state and city economic development and it certainly does not hurt to have a fresh set of eyes assessing the air-rights development mess.
-----However, maybe it?s time to take a walk on the wild side here, and remove an embattled and nearly bankrupt state authority from a job that is clearly way over its head.

http://www.bankerandtradesman.com/news133353.html
 
Re: Columbus Center

[size=+2]Columbus Center support vs. new bids[/size]

South End News ? 25 June 2009

[size=+1]Columbus Center support[/size]
For two years I have been reading comments by Ned Flaherty in regards to Columbus Center. For some reason, Mr. Flaherty decided to become the de facto spokesperson for all who live around Columbus Center. He does not speak for me.

Mr. Flaherty states the "Columbus Center is opposed by adjacent communities." I would like to make it clear that is indeed not the case. As a resident of Cortes St. directly across from the largest parcel of the project and perhaps most affected by any construction, I am totally in support of this project. In addition, most all that I have spoken to in Bay Village are in favor.

Mr. Flaherty also implies that $79 million has been given to the project from the city and state. If that was the case this project may have gone forward a long time ago. This project is just the type that should be receiving support to stimulate our local economy. It will create potentially thousands of jobs in construction and would certainly appear to be shovel-ready. The resulting completion connecting the Back Bay, Bay Village and the South End while covering the Mass. Pike. will improve the quality of life for all neighborhoods.

The trees are torn down, the grassy knoll is now a big pit and several million dollars of support are already placed in the ground. It is time for the city and state to step forward and assist in getting this project moving forward. Whatever past negative feelings towards the developer or politicians need to be put beahind us. Nothing ever gets accomplished by continuing to point fingers. Now more than ever, someone needs to step forward and make Columbus Center a reality.

Artie Rice
Cortes Street

[size=+1]Open the Columbus Center parcels to new bids[/size]
The community lost 24 mature trees from Cortes Street when workers for the Columbus Center proposal chopped them down in 2007.

A few Cortes Street residents still think the fastest way to get their street restored is to keep waiting for someone to build the now defunct project. They?re wrong, for two reasons.

First, the latest proposal includes a 30-year calendar that lets the owners finish as late as 2026. That schedule allows tunnel construction 2010 - 2011; all construction stalled again 2013 - 2023; and skyscraper/garage construction 2024 - 2025. This 10-year delay was reported over one year ago ("Another delay for Columbus Center," South End News, June 5, 2008).

Second, the Columbus Center project is insolvent: the current owners (California pension plan) stopped funding it in September 2007, the former owners (Winn Development) ran out of cash in February 2008, state government rescinded the public subsidies in April 2008, and no commercial bank ever issued a construction loan.

The fastest way to get this property developed ? and the surrounding streets restored ? is for the state to declare the current owners in default, evict them, and then get qualified developers to submit competitive bids, with full financial disclosure, that comply with the Turnpike Master Plan. State Representative Martha Walz recommended this over one year ago ("State pulls $10m slated for Columbus Center," Boston Globe, April 8, 2008).

That would fix Cortes Street for free, and a lot sooner than 2025.

Elissa Pogorski
St. Charles Street

http://www.mysouthend.com/index.php?ch=opinion&sc=letters&sc2=news&sc3=&id=92932
 
Re: Columbus Center

Developers of Pike site told to act
Show Columbus Center will be built, or remove staging, state officials say
By Casey Ross, Globe Staff | July 2, 2009

The Patrick administration has ordered developers of the $800 million Columbus Center project to either move forward with construction or spend millions of dollars to remove staging at the site - an ultimatum that could be a death knell for the foundering Boston development.

State officials expect the developers, the real estate arm of the California state pension fund and Boston-based Winn Cos., to remove barriers and take other steps to clean up the Back Bay work zone within several months, but officials also hint they will remove the team if it doesn?t soon produce proof it can build the massive project.

?At some point we need to call the question and say, is this really going to happen??? said Jeffrey Mullan, executive director of the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority, which has leased the site to the developers.

He did not give a deadline, but said the state cannot wait indefinitely while valuable property lies fallow, depriving taxpayers of millions in potential revenue and inconveniencing pedestrians, commuters, and nearby residents.

The state?s demand to restore the property puts Columbus Center on even shakier legs, as it adds millions of dollars in costs to a project that already cannot go forward for lack of funding.

The development team also includes the Beal Cos. and the Related Cos., which were brought in last September to see if they could devise a way to make the project viable.

In a statement yesterday, the team said it had no plans to bow out. ?We continue to work diligently to develop a viable strategy to move this important project forward,?? the statement said. ?We are best positioned to make this happen given our expertise and investments in the site.??

The statement said the developers are talking with city and state officials about further restoration of the site.

Given the weakness of the housing market and of the general consumer economy - as well as the difficulty of raising money to fund real estate construction - specialists said the prospects for a complex that includes condominiums, a hotel, and retail outlets are not promising. Developers will have to spend tens of millions of dollars to build a platform across the turnpike just to support the 35-story tower and other buildings that are planned between Arlington and Clarendon streets.

?It?s a visionary project, but it also carries construction costs that are very difficult to sustain in the current economic setting,?? said Richard Gollis, principal of Concord Group, a real estate advisory firm.

Conceived in 1996, Columbus Center was supposed to show that large-scale developments built over the highway would generate jobs and millions of dollars in tax revenues. But the project has suffered a series of setbacks and management changes. After finally breaking ground in late 2007, the developers halted construction a few months later when the economic downturn prevented them from lining up enough financing to continue. They were then required to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on interim repairs to clean the site, fix fencing, and remove parking obstructions.

So far, the second look undertaken by the Beal-Related Cos. venture has produced little public progress, and the team has otherwise kept a low profile.

Mullan said the state cannot wait any longer. He said the developers must restore the site to its original state or they will be in violation of their agreement with the Turnpike Authority.

Construction barriers near the Arlington Street onramp make it difficult for trucks and snowplows to navigate. State and Boston officials also want the developers to stabilize a slope along the ramp and remove unsightly construction fencing along city streets.

The Turnpike Authority could take the developers to court to enforce this demand. But Mullan acknowledged that the lease does not require the developers to post a bond or make other payments if they are unable to do the work themselves.

As for the more fundamental question of whether Columbus Center will ever be built, that remains uncertain, Mullan said. But, he added, the state will move to find new developers if officials don?t see progress in the next couple of years.

http://www.boston.com/business/arti...timatum_to_columbus_center_developers?mode=PF
 
Re: Columbus Center

[size=+2]Pike?s pushing cleanup of Columbus Center site[/size]

By Thomas Grillo ? July 11, 2009

cleanup2009-01.jpg

STAFF PHOTOS BY JOHN WILCOX

cleanup2009-02.jpg


Massachusetts Turnpike officials will meet with Columbus Center consultants next week to get a commitment to clean up the stalled construction site.

?We will have a list of potential safety, aesthetic and quality of life issues that need to be addressed,? said Peter O?Connor, the state?s deputy secretary for real estate. ?I don?t know why the site has not been cleaned up yet.?

Columbus Center, the 1.3 million-square-foot, mixed-use development to be built on a deck above the Massachusetts Turnpike was approved in 2003. MacFarlane Partners, the real estate arm of a California state pension fund, and Boston-based Winn Cos. broke ground in 2007 but work was halted several months later when the credit markets dried up and the state withdrew financial incentives.

Last fall, MacFarlane hired Beal Cos. of Boston and New York-based Related Properties as consultants to see if the $850 million project, in the works for 13 years, could be saved.

But the firms have not produced a promised report and have reneged on a pledge to remove construction staging and refurbish the site.

In April, Alan LeBovidge, the Pike?s former director, said he asked Beal to remove Jersey barriers along the Pike extension, but was told the developers needed more time.

Peter Spellios, Beal?s attorney, declined to comment. In an e-mail statement, a spokeswoman said, ?We continue to discuss with the city of Boston and the Turnpike additional items that will further secure and restore the site.?

O?Connor will do a walk-through at the construction site with residents Monday at 7 p.m.

http://www.bostonherald.com/busines..._columbus_center_site/srvc=home&position=also
 
Re: Columbus Center

[size=+2]Columbus Center walk-through gives residents a chance to voice their concerns[/size]

South End News ? By Bessie King ? July 16, 2009

walk-through.jpg


New deputy secretary of real estate and economic development Peter O?Connor led a walk through of the Columbus Center project site on Monday evening. (Photo: Rick Friedman)

Since the beginning of construction at the proposed Columbus Center project site, residents of Cortes Street have had to deal with the nuisance of development noise and aesthetic decline caused by the work that was done. That work has long since ceased, leaving the site in limbo. On Monday, July 13 residents toured the site with John Romano, municipal affairs liaison at the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority (MTA), William Tuttle, director of real estate at the MTA, Peter O?Connor, deputy secretary of real state and economic development for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and Aaron Michlewitz, the newly sworn-in 3rd Suffolk state rep.

Luis Gomes, a Cortes Street resident, said the construction has negatively altered the area.

?Before there used to be a park and it had trees as tall as our buildings,? said Gomes. ?The trees would act as a barrier and break down the noise from the Turnpike but now we have nothing and these fences only take space and nobody sees what happens because they block the view. They should put the park back and put the trees back if they are not going to do anything else because this could last another three, five or more years.?

Organized by neighbor Lynn Andrews, the informal tour brought out approximately a dozen neighbors, who voiced their concerns and comments as they walked through the fenced and jersey barrier-filled section of Cortes Street, asking for improvements on cleaning and safety measures.

?This conversation is not about what is going to happen with the project, it?s actually about what is going to happen on our street because I?ve seen other streets, even Clarendon, that are cleaner and look much better than ours,? said Andrews.

During the meeting O?Connor, a South End resident, said he will do his best to get the Columbus Center project owners to clean up the area and better the conditions of the fences and barriers on the street. He also said, after being asked why the obstacles have not been removed completely, that they are there because construction will happen at some point since the city is not willing to give up on the project, ?just yet.? Neighbors pointed to the trash that accumulates on the sidewalk where the fence is and images of mattresses that were left as trash against a jersey barrier by people who don?t live on the street, and even one image of a couch that was left during the night as trash on the fenced side of Cortes Street.

The lack of visibility is also affecting the driving situation, according to Fayette Street resident Susanne Wadsworth.

?People who are used to coming down the other side of the Turnpike make an illegal right turn on Arlington Street to turn on this island and go through Cortes Street, I don?t do that,? said Wadsworth. ?I have to go around to make it to Berkeley and then over my street. Through the years that is a fair amount of gas and hassle and accidents that have occurred or almost did.?

Some residents on the side of Cortes and Berkeley Street are preoccupied with the increase of prostitution they have seen due to the fact that the fence in place blocks visibility across the Turnpike Bridge for police.

?We live on the side of Isabella Street and we see what is happening from our basement window and we call the police but it keeps going on,? said a female resident and mother of one who wished to remain anonymous.

An increase in car and bike burglary has also been noticed and in the past two weeks two cars have been keyed, according to Andrews and other residents. Although no promises or deadlines were given to residents on Monday night, O?Connor, who was appointed to his position two weeks ago, promised again to try his best and better the situation without discussing previous statements from the MTA or others.

?I want to know what the effect of this is on your way of life and see how we can work with the developer to improve this,? he said.

However, after such a long period of inaction, the South End?s new state rep. thinks it?s time for a new direction for the project.

?For not being on top of this during five months, due to the campaign and election period, and come back to see it in the same state I left it I feel truly disappointed,? said Michlewitz. ?This has put a lot of communities in limbo for well over a year and with no movement I just think it?s time to reshuffle the deck and start looking for alternatives.?

http://www.mysouthend.com/index.php?ch=news&sc=&sc2=news&sc3=&id=93747
 
Re: Columbus Center

[size=+2]Do we need a Milena Del Valle tragedy to get the Columbus Center site cleaned?[/size]

South End News ? By Co-Publisher Sue O?Connell ? July 16, 2009

editorial.jpg

Not a pretty sight. (Photo: Rick Friedman)

It?s human nature. We joke about the sloppy construction of our Big Dig, or walk around the deteriorating Columbus Center construction site. We throw our hands up in the air in helplessness. Too much corruption to fix it-too little money, we say.

The Big Dig and Columbus Center have a lot in common. The biggest difference, however, is that one project was completed, and the other remains in unfinished limbo. The apathy toward the Big Dig resulted in the death of Milena Del Valle in July of 2006 when a concrete slab of a poorly constructed tunnel robbed her husband, Angel, of ?the woman of [his] life,? as he told the Boston Globe. She had three adult children living in Costa Rica at the time of her death. Fortunately, the apathy toward the Columbus Center hasn?t resulted in death or injury-yet.

Why hasn?t the site been cleaned up? Perhaps because the Columbus Center occupies a site neither here (the South End) nor there (Back Bay); or maybe because it?s over the Mass Pike (theoretically); or maybe because there aren?t a lot of residents to keep watch. The Mass Pike, the city, our elected officials and the myriad developers and consultants of the project have managed to avoid cleaning the site and making it safe. The aesthetic and quality-of-life issues should be reason enough for all to act, but they haven?t. In new deputy secretary of real state and economic development Peter O?Connor?s walk-through on Monday night with a small number of community activists no guarantees or promises were made.

We?re told the city hasn?t given up on the project yet. Sure looks that way. In fact, two important figures, Mayor Thomas Menino and 3rd Suffolk State Rep. Aaron Michlewitz, have openly expressed their frustrations with the project?s failings.

So, what will it take? A bad car accident due to the poor visability around the site? An attack on one of the prostitutes who now frequent the area? A tragedy??

Contact Michlewitz, Menino, O?Connor, or even Governor Deval Patrick and ask how you can help. It might be the only way the site is ever restored.

http://www.mysouthend.com/index.php?ch=opinion&sc=editorial&sc2=news&sc3=&id=93754
 
Re: Columbus Center

[size=+2]Columbus Center complaints intensify[/size]

By Globe Correspondent Christina Pazzanese ? August 1, 2009

Intensify.jpg


Among the complaints of residents about the unfinished Columbus Center project is the removal of Jersey barriers along the Mass. Pike, Cortes St., and a Pike ramp on Arlington St. (Christina Pazzanese)

As the fate of the stalled Columbus Center project continues to twist in the wind, some residents of Back Bay, Bay Village, and the South End are getting fed up with declining conditions in their neighborhoods. The 7-acre, $800 million development has been in the works since 1996 and calls for a hotel, luxury condominium high-rises, a parking garage, and a new city park to be built over the Massachusetts Turnpike from Clarendon Street to Marginal Road.

Though the controversial project has long had its critics, neighbors ramped up concerns and doubts after developers were granted an 18-month construction hiatus to sort out financing difficulties last year.

Renewed complaints by residents prompted officials from the state Executive Office of Transportation, which assumed oversight of the project from the Turnpike Authority in May, and authority officials, to tour the area July 13.

Ned Flaherty, a South End resident and project watchdog, says the developers have 26 restoration tasks that they are required to finish, in addition to promises they must fulfill under the existing lease agreement governing the city and state property.

Among them are removing Jersey barriers along the Mass. Pike, Cortes Street, and a Pike ramp at Arlington Street that narrow the roadway; replacing two dozen trees that were cut down on Cortes; restoring power to more than 75 lights over the Pike that have been dark for well over a year; and paying for a new ventilation system at the MBTA Back Bay train station to help filter high levels of diesel exhaust.

Other requests include taking down construction fences, and cleaning up trash and weeds.

The developer, state, and city respond

?The Columbus Center developers have thus far spent over $400,000 on ?temporary? restoration efforts, in response to requests from the neighborhoods, the city, and the state,? the development team at CUIP-Winn Columbus Center LLC stated in an e-mail. The firm has removed barriers along Marginal Road; pushed back a fence and patched pavement on Cahners Way; fixed or replaced torn screens on several fences; and picked up litter and debris, said Carolyn Spicer, a company spokeswoman. ?We take restoration issues very seriously and are currently working with the city and state to address the additional issues raised. The economic challenges for this project are not unlike any other project in the country. This project is a priority for us, and we continue to work hard to ensure that Columbus Center moves forward as quickly as possible,? the statement said.

State transportation officials have not yet reached an agreement on what work will be done or by what date. ?We are meeting with the developers, and our goal is to have the developers clean up the site according to the neighbors? understandable concerns,? said Adam Hurtubise, a spokesman for the Executive Office of Transportation.

The Boston Redevelopment Authority has been working with the Mayor?s Office of Neighborhood Services to ensure complaints that affect city property are addressed by the developer.

?At this time, the BRA is awaiting the outcome of the state?s determination . . . of the development?s status,? said Jessica Shumaker, a BRA spokeswoman. ?In the interim, at the city level, we will continue to enforce and monitor safety and transportation issues expeditiously.?

Commissioner William Good said officials from the city?s Inspectional Services Department walked through the area last week to review complaints about improper trash disposal. Good said the department will monitor the neighborhood, though it has no plans to install security cameras, as some hoped.

As for that new air filtration system at Back Bay Station, the MBTA and state transportation officials have identified $3 million in federal stimulus funds to pay for the equipment, said T spokeswoman Lydia Rivera.

Now under federal review, the money is expected to be released in October, with a contract to follow after Jan. 1, she said.

Who?s in charge?

Secretary of Transportation James A. Aloisi Jr., Executive Office of Transportation. 10 Park Plaza. Suite 3170. Boston, MA 02116. 617-973-7000.

http://www.boston.com/news/local/ma...columbus_center_project_complaints_intensify/
 

Back
Top