This thing is a real piece of shit. That overhang is massive, dark, and downright threatening. The courtyard is the definition of wasted space and a massive fuck you to our housing problem. If you haven't seen it in person, it is worth a special trip to experience this level of architectural failure firsthand.
This thing is a real piece of shit. That overhang is massive, dark, and downright threatening. The courtyard is the definition of wasted space and a massive fuck you to our housing problem. If you haven't seen it in person, it is worth a special trip to experience this level of architectural failure firsthand.
-1
Come on guys, the negative overreaction on this board lately is really getting annoying. Is this complex perfectly conceived? No. Is it more original and distinctive than 99% of what's gone up in this city recently? Absolutely.
I'll take this over the generic boxes we get in Kendall Sq. and the Seaport any day of the week and twice on Sundays.
I like the buildings, they're interesting, and the retail will definitely soften things. But the courtyard really is oversized to the point of absurdity. Thank the Cambridge Open Space Mafia for this kind of false environmentalism and the same mistake is surely going to happen at the Volpe site. Guess there's no such thing as too many parks for one to do one's magical purple unicorn riding in.
Brad & Tonty -- remember this is really an extension of MIT's campus and it incorporates the historic Barta Building once the site of the revolutionary Whirlwind Computer
MIT required the courtyard just all of the MIT academic buildings surround courtyards
The comments about housing Cambridge and Boston and the Cambridge mania for open spaces are utterly irrelevant to the discussion of this project -- this was never going to be housing
Finally the courtyard is s public space not much different than all of the MIT green spaces interleaved between MIT academic buildings
Viewed in the above context -- its way more than a qualified success
Is it more original and distinctive than 99% of what's gone up in this city recently? Absolutely. I'll take this over the generic boxes we get in Kendall Sq. and the Seaport any day
It is distinctly anti-urban. If MIT built this on an interior parcel I think I could forgive a lot, but this is a prominent intersection on a major urban thoroughfare. It is lacking in almost any context whatsoever and is hostile to pedestrians.
This thing is a real piece of shit. That overhang is massive, dark, and downright threatening. The courtyard is the definition of wasted space and a massive fuck you to our housing problem. If you haven't seen it in person, it is worth a special trip to experience this level of architectural failure firsthand.
Instagram friend must work inside or something to that effect; he posted a picture of the brise-soleil from within:
http://websta.me/n/bmeeee
But take a look at the actual courtyard being discussed. It's all just mounds of dirt and trees and mulch and walkway. Nobody is going to use that space. It's only going to sit empty, taking up square footage and maintenance dollars. How can you seriously say that the Novartis courtyard is "[a] public space not much different than all of the MIT green spaces interleaved between MIT academic buildings"? Killian Court this space is not. And how can you frequent a forum dedicated to design in "Boston's Built Environment" and not understand that all open spaces are not created equal?
If this courtyard incorporated green space along with benches and shade and maybe a fountain or two (think Post Office Square), you could have a point. But in its current form it is nothing but wasted space.
Instagram friend must work inside or something to that effect; he posted a picture of the brise-soleil from within:
http://websta.me/n/bmeeee