Full disclosure: Goshen is my home town. I have deep roots in the community and growing up there helped form my preservationist ideals.
**None of these images are mine**
Goshen has roots dating back to the first decade of the 1700s, and as a community has a long, long tradition of embracing its almost wholy intact historic fabric dating back far longer then what is vogue for the movement. As an example, when the railroad pulled out of town in the early 80s they came up with an adaptive reuse of the train station as the village police department:
New construction has also embraced this historic context, such as this building put up on a former rail yard:
And this complex, which I believe was a partial renovation/restoration of old depot buildings as well as new construction:
The Rudolph building is completely out of context to the rest of the village which still retains almost its entire downtown:
There are also tons of old mansions, relating to the towns long history of hosting lawyers. Many are on the historic register and were designed by famous architects. This one is particularly notable as it was designed by Calvert Vaux, who was partners with Olmstead for a while (my friend also grew up in an apartment within before it was restored):
The the "Lawyers Row", which is almost directly across the street from the Government Center.
One of the earlier (1841) courthouses:
The 1887 Courthouse, which the Government Center was built to replace. This courthouse was contextual to the village not just in architecture but that it stands at a Y intersection giving it a monumental feel (there is also a memorial out of frame to the right)
For local government, the Village works out of "Maplewood", another old mansion:
The Town works out of one of the earlier schoolhouses:
Across the street from the government center is the old High School, reused as the main offices for the school district:
Just up the street is the monumental middle school:
There is also a great collection of Flatirons relating to Goshens irregular street patterns as
chronicled here.
Goshen's primary economy relates to the government offices being located there, however the secondary economy relates to tourism, as the Historic Track (the oldest operating harness racing track in the US) is right in the village, within a stones throw of the Government Center:
Legend has it that harness racing as a sport developed because the lawyers used to drag race carriages down Main Street, terrorizing pedestrians. A track was built to allow them to do it safely.
Goshen is also host to an extremely popular Fourth of July event (the Great American Weekend). A 5k and 10k race, harness racing, craft fair, food fair, carnival, music tent, and opening of many of the historic homes for tours packs the village from end to end. Well almost end to end...
The town recently purchased a former Salesian Seminary off Main St and began the process of transforming the derelict property into a public park. It's only a half mile from the village green (which is reaching capacity for the GAW) and a third of a mile from the track.
However, the Orange County Government Center stands between the two. And it holistically destroys the streetwall and deadens Main St to the point there is barely any foot traffic. This is further compounded by a gigantic parking lot, demolished jail, and mansions across the street (maplewood being one)
^The smaller building behind the church on the village green is the aforementioned 1887 courthouse.
This is further compounded by the ill-thought procession to enter the building.
The original entrances were supposed to be accessible by a beautiful central courtyard:
This was abandoned almost immediately however, as the courtyard can only be accessed from the south, which requires walking around almost the entire building from the parking lot. And since it's a county building, everyone arrives by car. It is also not ADA accessible in any manner. Therefore the defacto entrance for anyone coming to the center for the passport office, DMV, or child courts has become a tiny metal side door:
Once inside, the interior is a confusing labyranth of passages, ramps and stairs. If you are my grandmother who couldn't go up stairs it ment circumventing the entire building several times to access elevators. This is another frequent complaint unrelated to the asthetics of the building.
In contrast to Rudolph's rather utopian vision of people walking (from where who knows, the train was on its way out when the designs were being made)
A large parking lot filled the void.
Shot-for-Shot
Another design flaw is the 87 roofs (above), which have been leaking almost since the initial construction. Visitors frequently walk under tarps inside to collect the flowing water. The entire structure is also infested with mold from this, leading to the abandonment of the courthouse itself in favor of a (terrible, also above) modernist addition. As already mentioned, it is also impossible to heat and cool properly (I can attest to this, one room will be 100 and the next 40), and the HVAC is difficult to impossible to upgrade due to the design of the building (it is integrated into the formwork. Same with the lighting, which is also rather dark).
In my opinion, it is also one of Rudolph's weaker works. As I mentioned, its placement on the site works against the entrance procession. Its best feature (the courtyard and pavilion, below) are unused and under appreciated due to them being on the wrong side of the building. The building itself is too far from the street on all sides, and its gigantic parking lot forces visitors through a side door.
The materials are also lackluster, no more then cinderblocks with a slight grain pressed in. It is also susceptible to staining very quickly. They cleaned the building twice while I was living there, and it looked good for only a few months before the dark stains came back. Solar glare also frequently leads to shades being drawn over its many windows, further adding to an aesthetic disaster.
More importantly, the building has been whole heartily and unequivocally DESPISED in Goshen since it was first proposed. The county wanted to project a futuristic image to keep it relevant with the times. The residents of Goshen wanted something that would be sensitive to their village. In addition, a beautiful mansion and its formal grounds were demolished to make room (Pictured below, its the building to the right of the rear of the left train). As the county owned the property, the residents of Goshen could do little more than complain and look on in dismay, as they have been for over 40 years.
If this building was anywhere but Goshen I (nor many of the other detractors) wouldnt have any issue with it. This has been stated many times by many people. However it is completely out of context in Goshen. It was never wanted, and has been working to destroy the image of the town for decades. In fact, when I first moved there in 2nd grade the VERY FIRST conversation I had with my new classmates was them asking what I thought of the "ugly cereal box building". The level of loathing of this building on the local level is unmatched, not even in relation to our own Government Center in Boston.
If a building is insensitive to its environment, why should the environment be sensitive to it?
Despite its history, this building does not deserve a future. It is wildly out of context to the rest of the village (particularly the adjacent
Church Park historic district), leaves a shamefull impression on all visitors (to both the building and the village), and was built against the wishes of the public.
The
only reason I would want to see it spared the wrecking ball is that I do not trust the county to build an adequate replacement. As I previously mentioned, the new courthouse built adjacent to it is equally horrid (and was also vastly behind schedule when being built), and I do not trust cash-strapped Orange County to be able to replace it with something vernacular and of quality. A possible hope may be in a public-private partnership, as many of the new construction buildings I posted above have been of remarkable quality and approperate asthetics. The county as a whole is just warming up to real ruban planning vs sprawl however, so I do not trust the leglistors to make a good decision.
The issue has been pressed as the center has been abandoned for over a year now, as Irene flooded the building and increased the amount of mold to a point that the offices had to be moved out into buildings spread out across the entire county.
On ArchDaily
On Wikipedia
Sorry, Paul