Parcel 12 | Massachusetts Avenue at Boylston Street | Back Bay

Equilibria

Senior Member
Joined
May 6, 2007
Messages
4,464
Reaction score
796
EPNF has been posted to BPDA website, so time to split the thread (and effectively end the other one, since we're out of projects).

http://www.bostonplans.org/documents/projects/development-project-filings/parcel-12-expanded-project-notification-form

Pretty pictures begin on p.59.

Highlights include the relocation of the I-90 onramp west down Newbury to narrow/simplify the Mass Ave intersection, as well as a Green Line headhouse using the reactivated pedestrian tunnel, though I'm puzzled why they chose to locate the bus stop at the other end of the block and put parking in front of the GL door. They do note that MassDOT would be planning and building (and presumably funding) the new onramp.

All the benefit of this one is really at street level. Aesthetically it reminds me of what Waterside Place was supposed to be, on a smaller scale.

I wish they'd included a render from the Pike, but eh.

EDIT: It would also be nice if when the station renovation happens here and on the Peebles side, the MBTA renames it "Newbury". It's not at the Hynes Convention Center, that's not where most conventions are anyway, and people call the station "Hynes", which contains no information at all about where the station is. If we can't go back to "Massachusetts" because the T doesn't want to duplicate the OL name, then let's go with the cross street.
 
Last edited:

reverend_paco

Active Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2012
Messages
370
Reaction score
52
EPNF has been posted to BPDA website, so time to split the thread (and effectively end the other one, since we're out of projects).

http://www.bostonplans.org/documents/projects/development-project-filings/parcel-12-expanded-project-notification-form

Pretty pictures begin on p.59.

Highlights include the relocation of the I-90 onramp west down Newbury to narrow/simplify the Mass Ave intersection, as well as a Green Line headhouse using the reactivated pedestrian tunnel, though I'm puzzled why they chose to locate the bus stop at the other end of the block and put parking in front of the GL door. They do note that MassDOT would be planning and building (and presumably funding) the new onramp.....

I had no idea there already was a pedestrian tunnel to that side. Would be lovely to open that up.
 

JumboBuc

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2013
Messages
2,139
Reaction score
201
It would also be nice if when the station renovation happens here and on the Peebles side, the MBTA renames it "Newbury". It's not at the Hynes Convention Center, that's not where most conventions are anyway, and people call the station "Hynes", which contains no information at all about where the station is. If we can't go back to "Massachusetts" because the T doesn't want to duplicate the OL name, then let's go with the cross street.
Or go back to "Auditorium"
 

Suffolk 83

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2007
Messages
2,268
Reaction score
110
The city should be demanding bolder/better architecture here
 

cjbski

Active Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2015
Messages
867
Reaction score
98
- Agreed on changing the T stop name. Newbury would be great. Why was it called "Auditorium"?

- Suffolk: I agree that better architecture would be great here given it's one of the first things people see when coming into town, but any project over the Pike here will be a win. Samuels has done a solid job, they hopefully can get it built.

This + 1000 Boylston + The Viola are going to be amazing!
 

Czervik.Construction

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2013
Messages
1,491
Reaction score
208
Why do they go through the trouble of including 1 Dalton in so many renders, but have the wrong height, 691' vs ~740+?
 

DZH22

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2006
Messages
5,903
Reaction score
2,648
691 is the zoning height whether you like it or not.
It was changed to 699' at some point. I still don't understand why that's what we always see though, the lines to the highest occupied floor while ignoring the mech tops.

Speaking of that, their line for the Prudential ignores the mech top. Does that mean the Pru might really be 760'+ and has been listed incorrectly this entire time?
 

kmp1284

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
1,886
Reaction score
96
It was changed to 699' at some point. I still don't understand why that's what we always see though, the lines to the highest occupied floor while ignoring the mech tops.

Speaking of that, their line for the Prudential ignores the mech top. Does that mean the Pru might really be 760'+ and has been listed incorrectly this entire time?
If you're going to obsess over this height crap, at least do it in the thread devoted to that project.
 

elemenoh

Active Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2013
Messages
271
Reaction score
9
- Agreed on changing the T stop name. Newbury would be great. Why was it called "Auditorium"?
It was called "Auditorium" after the adjacent War Memorial Auditorium, which was renamed the Hynes Auditorium in the late 60s and then updated to Hynes Convention Center when it was renovated & expanded in 1988. So they changed the Green Line stop name then until it became Hynes/ICA (why, I don't recall) and then the ICA moved so it became Hynes Convention Center again.

I think "Parcel 12" has a nice ring to it for a station name! But Newbury would make the most sense, since it's unlikely to change again in our lifetimes.
 

vanshnookenraggen

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
May 25, 2006
Messages
6,453
Reaction score
259
I really wish there was more to the residential portion. Given that it's ON TOP OF A T STATION they could easily get away with more height. Oh well, it's still very nice. Hynes MBTA stop is getting all the love these days.
 

sm89

Active Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
906
Reaction score
27
Would the pedestrian underpass be used though? Seems easier to just cross the street. In my experience the underpass at Mass Ave station on the Orange Line is seldom used and people just use the crosswalk.
 

Brookline-ish

New member
Joined
Sep 25, 2016
Messages
54
Reaction score
13
Would the pedestrian underpass be used though? Seems easier to just cross the street. In my experience the underpass at Mass Ave station on the Orange Line is seldom used and people just use the crosswalk.
The light schedule there crossing Mass Ave is easily a minute long wait. I'd take the tunnel every time, no matter the direction. Why wait?
 

odurandina

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2015
Messages
5,328
Reaction score
252
Great contributions DD..... Great project. Albeit a bit too squat.
 

Smartiro

Active Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2012
Messages
415
Reaction score
20
Really nice project. Well thought out. I really wish they used a little less glass though - I'm tired of glass...
 

datadyne007

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 15, 2010
Messages
8,859
Reaction score
196
It was changed to 699' at some point. I still don't understand why that's what we always see though, the lines to the highest occupied floor while ignoring the mech tops.

Speaking of that, their line for the Prudential ignores the mech top. Does that mean the Pru might really be 760'+ and has been listed incorrectly this entire time?
No, it means they are architects working on a nearby parcel and aren't wasting their time (which = money) obsessing over the height depictions of parcels that aren't theirs. The Pru height is probably directly from the city's 3D CAD model.
 

stefal

Active Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2015
Messages
812
Reaction score
293
I know we've continued to veer off the design focused discussion here, but this is the first time I'm seeing parcels 9, 10, and 11 outlined. Are those actually buildable? Isn't the pike "ground-level" here/how would people even access these?
 

Top