Ha ha, the reflections looks like a Frank Gehry building (which is a good thing!).
I must've missed something. When has it been falling apart? The Blue Line isn't on my regular route (I'm usually Green, Orange, Red), but on the occasions that I do ride the Blue it always seems super solid.
The overhead wires have failed quite dramatically multiple times in the past month or so. (Not my picture)I must've missed something. When has it been falling apart? The Blue Line isn't on my regular route (I'm usually Green, Orange, Red), but on the occasions that I do ride the Blue it always seems super solid.
The MBTA should just 3rd rail the entire BL. The NYC subway system surface line out to Rockaway Beach (next to the Atlantic Ocean) is all 3rd rail. So the argument that the BL has to be catenary because it's near the ocean is not really valid.The overhead wires have failed quite dramatically multiple times in the past month or so. (Not my picture)
View attachment 74760
It's under active study as part of Blue Line Transformation. The entire overhead system is at replacement age, so they have a non-optional decision to make soon on whether to program a bunch of $$$ to renew it or replace it. Chances are they're going to want to replace it, as third-rail is simply so much more durable for rapid transit duty cycles and BLT wants to take the Blue Line down to 3-minute frequencies which would exert even more punishment on the overhead than today's service levels. The fears 75 years ago that icing would unduly mess with it was never borne out by reality on this system and several others with similar climates.I think the T has plans to replace the catenary with third rail. I think it historically it was catenary because the MTA was afraid of third rail icing near the ocean, and they didn’t want to invest in third rail heaters.