Portland International Jetport | PWM

Over 50 flights today out of the Jetport! I didn’t realize Houston was mainline now, that seems like a great sign. Takes away the crown for the longest E-175 route in the country but I’ll take mainline service all day! Also cool seeing LGA, EWR, and JFK having 150+ seaters sent here consistently
 
Non stop to Houston is Saturday only and the upgrade to an A319 is great. Delta now uses an A220-300 for the evening flight to LGA on Saturdays which they have not done in many years. JetBlue upgrading to an A320 to JFK is also a positive step and hopefully they will go back to providing year round service again.
 
Screenshot 2026-07-11 at 10.03.58 PM 2.png

Our two United flights to LAX and SFO on the 737 MAX 8 require a 7800' runway at max takeoff weight. Am curious, are these departures forced to remove passengers or only book 90% of the seats to meet the weight limitations for PWM's 7200' runway? The airport's elevation is close to sea level which helps but we've had some hot humid Saturdays recently which definitely effects aircraft performance. I am aware that the A220-300 has zero issues with the length of Portland's primary runway.
 
Portlander said:
Non stop to Houston is Saturday only and the upgrade to an A319 is great. Delta now uses an A220-300 for the evening flight to LGA on Saturdays which they have not done in many years. JetBlue upgrading to an A320 to JFK is also a positive step and hopefully they will go back to providing year round service again.
Click to expand...

AA is also using the MAX-8 on some LGA flights!

Looking ahead, it looks like WN quietly added quite a bit more lift to MCO in February and March. MCO used to be Saturday-only in Feb and March, but now runs Thurs-Sun from mid February through mid March.
 
Portlander said:
View attachment 73953
Our two United flights to LAX and SFO on the 737 MAX 8 require a 7800' runway at max takeoff weight. Am curious, are these departures forced to remove passengers or only book 90% of the seats to meet the weight limitations for PWM's 7200' runway? The airport's elevation is close to sea level which helps but we've had some hot humid Saturdays recently which definitely effects aircraft performance. I am aware that the A220-300 has zero issues with the length of Portland's primary runway.
Click to expand...
They're likely not leaving PWM at MTOW for the MAX-8. That figure assumes a full fuel load for its full range of 3,500 NM. PWM-SFO is 2,400 NM so quite a bit below the max range for the type.

The MAX-8 burns about 10-10.5 lbs. of fuel per nautical mile while cruising, and if we take the distance of PWM-SFO (2,400 NM) against the full range of the MAX-8 (3,500 NM) we can figure out that an typical MAX-8 on this route is departing PWM roughly 5 tons lighter than it would be at MTOW.

I would assume UA isn't blocking seats. The weight of a dozen passengers isn't nearly as consequential as the weight of an extra ~1,000 miles worth of fuel :)
 
Last edited:
Cosakita18 said:
You're right! An A220-300 could fill its tanks to the brim for its full 3,400 NM range, and take a full load of plus-sized passengers to London (~2,800 NM) and leave PWM with runway to spare :)
Click to expand...
Your mouth to BA's ears!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top