Yeah, the same 1960s BRA urban renewal feeding frenzy that devoured the old West End and Scollay Square devoured a large chunk of South Station. Oddly enough, the Vietnam War is partly responsible for putting the brakes on demolishing ALL of South Station. JFK was assassinated, LBJ took over and escalated the Vietnam war, with a likewise reduction in urban renewal funds made worse by JFK no longer being around to champion renewal funds for Boston.I didn’t know that what is now Fidelity HQ was actually where the original South Station building continued. That section was apparently torn down and the land was sold…crazy.
feels like that core is really movin'
Does anybody know the construction schedule... when they'll work on the interior of the arches/domes and the connecting structure over the Atlantic Avenue side of the train passenger platform? In addition to the building, I'm also interested the finished version of the train station, and when it will happen.
It is a cheap way to (not) interface the dissimilar construction methods with varying thermal and vibration properties. The buildings did not need to be connected, so they are not. You avoid the cost of a complex floating interface.Thanks. I still don't understand why there is apparently an open-air gap between the existing station building and the angle connecting structure between the new bus terminal and the tower. If it's for ventilation, it seems like there could be a better way to provide that. You can see what I'm talking about at :52 in the video.
I assumed it was value engineering. But it's ultimately poor planning. Even extending the connecting structure over the roof of the existing station by a few feet would keep the rain out. The truss is already there because of the tower. All they'd need to do is connect it a little further over. If the final product is as it looks in the video, people will get rained upon and the platform will get wet. They will have spent how many millions of dollars to end up with that?It is a cheap way to (not) interface the dissimilar construction methods with varying thermal and vibration properties. The buildings did not need to be connected, so they are not. You avoid the cost of a complex floating interface.
Excellent portmanteau."facadectomy."