Suffolk 83
Senior Member
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2007
- Messages
- 2,976
- Reaction score
- 2,319
3.16
looks like the climber has been hoisted; up she goes!
There are some conficting hopes for how this all eventually turns out and I'm not sure some people are fully aware how they're at odds with one another, given that some folks have expressed hope for both. There are those who are super concerned about the above referenced "gap" and then there are others (although sometimes the same posters) who really want natural light in the platform area.Some photos of the train station. You can see the really big gap between the station house and the new building/track platform. A worker said they had plans to eventually enclose the opening. I hope he was right.
They should paint a long yellow line along there as a "mind the gap" reminder.Some photos of the train station. You can see the really big gap between the station house and the new building/track platform. A worker said they had plans to eventually enclose the opening. I hope he was right.
Simple. Cover it with glass or something transparent, and everybody is happy.
Simple. Cover it with glass or something transparent, and everybody is happy.There's a lot of conficting hopes for how this all eventually turns out and I'm not sure some people are fully aware how they're at odds with one another, given that some folks have expressed hope for both. There are those who are super concerned about the above referenced "gap" and then there are others (although sometimes the same posters) who really want natural light in the platform area.
The "gap" provides much of the natural light that many (me included) value. You cover that gap and you lose lots of the light.
Which is it? Pick a lane.
I guess the optimal solution would be to close the gap with a massive skylight?
I don't think people were complaining about natural light for the outside platform area. Multiple people had mentioned that now the existing interior Concourse is going to be dark. I don't think that small gap between the old and new structures was going to provide any natural light. At least, that was my assumption.There are some conficting hopes for how this all eventually turns out and I'm not sure some people are fully aware how they're at odds with one another, given that some folks have expressed hope for both. There are those who are super concerned about the above referenced "gap" and then there are others (although sometimes the same posters) who really want natural light in the platform area.
The "gap" provides much of the natural light that many (me included) value. You cover that gap and you lose lots of the light.
Which is it? Pick a lane.
I guess the optimal solution would be to close the gap with a massive skylight?
That's great that you don't mind getting wet when it's cold. Not everybody is as hearty as you. Hopefully the architects of this project were thinking of others.I guess I just don't see that tiny stretch of exposure to rain or snow as something that "sucks." If you leave your home and take any type of transportation, you are going to, at some point, come into contact with the weather and if it's raining you'll get a little wet.
I used to be at South Station taking the Acela to NYC all the time and whenever there was any weather I (and everyone else) got a little wet or cold. Big deal.
Painted red like that; I think its part of the "self-riser" concrete scaffold??Also, you don't want beams falling on people. (Glad nobody got hurt.)