State of the Start Up

Hasn't it been this way for a while? A student at Harvard or MIT has some great idea, works out the kinks while a student and then sprints to CA as soon as they get their first whiff of VC money?

I think it more to do with weather than anything else.
 
30/50 in the Bay Area...sounds about right. What's more surprising is that Boston can't even manage to separate itself from the rest of the pack.

@statler: I read an article a while back by some insider with experience both in SV and in Boston...his argument is that Boston's crumbling position in the startup world can be at least partially attributed to a lack of..wait for it...happy hours. There's just so much more drinking (=networking) in Silicon Valley, and this has certainly helped cement (alcohol = social glue) its status as a collaboration friendly environment, etc etc.

It was funny when I first read it, but he could certainly have a point. Plus, there's always the weather.
 
^^ Seems like a well-reasoned, reality-based observation.
 
In that case, people need to lean on the state legislators from high-tech areas (e.g. Cambridge, Burlington, Waltham) to get this prohibition repealed.
 
Yours is a good idea, Ron. I don't believe that the Cambridge, Burlington, and Waltham chapters of Mothers Against Drunk Driving would agree...
 
At the first Albany/Harrison meeting one of the speakers said that the first thing these tech people ask when looking to lease space is what is the cool factor. Now i'm off to the next meeting.
 
^ Well that's certainly the trend. The Mission is overflowing with small startups, to go along with all the bars (and taquerias, and hipsters). Of course, bigger companies have to relocate to comparatively boring neighborhoods like SoMa, but this still keeps everybody in the city.

And even in the Valley, the point about drinking isn't meant to apply to the Silicon Valley giants who've expanded into office parks alongside the freeway (and can now afford chauffeurs). It applies to those companies when they were leasing small offices above University Ave in Palo Alto, or Castro St in Mountain View, both of which are sufficiently endowed with bars. Look at the founding dates of the companies in this WSJ list...many of them are not exactly early-stage.

But as Paul mentioned, the "cool factor" is becoming increasingly crucial, and this is surely why places like the Mission are taking off. It doesn't seem to me that this was such a concern for earlier techies...and thank goodness because bars in Palo Alto largely suck (the best one isn't even on University).

Oh, and I can't forget to mention the best part: you are in fact permitted to drink alcohol on the Caltrain. Northbound trains on Friday afternoons are alleged to be moving happy hours for reverse commuting techies...I need to check that out myself.
 
Of the WSJ's ranking of top 50 venture-backed start up firms in America... only ONE is in Massachusetts.

Nearly all are in the Bay Area.

Even New York has a weak showing.

The MA company is ExaGrid Systems in Westborough.

Is this state still competitive when it comes to entrepreneurial innovation?

I'm not at all impressed with the WSJ when it comes to analyzing entrepreneurial activiy -- on the recent VC funding front -- 3Q $ invested in start-ups Boston dropped to 3rd (just behind NYC) from its traditional 2nd place to CA for the first time in a long while

However, since both the CA and NYC start-ups tend to be much more marketing-cost intensive (consumer products and business multi-media respectively) -- while ours are stronger on technology and typically require less funding all the way through their evolution

Overall we are still doing ok in start-ups --- Despite the high taxes, rediculusous regulations and rolls of red tape -- a lot of the best and brightest still want to start right here -- unfortunately not all of them stay to grow.

Besides cutting the costs of starting and growing -- We'd do a lot better if we could find a way to create resonably priced family-friendly housing (including good local schools) near to the Kendal-World -- Innovation -- Hub -- especially for young framilies of newly minted MIT grduates of all levels -- who's like to bitke or walk to work.

Unfortuanately -- We keep losing too many of these young-gun slingers to places with much more family-lifestyle affordability such as Austin and NC as well as losing foriegn students to their home countries.

Because we have a top-end lifestyle and the matching housing -- we have no problem re-acquiring the super-stars for the established places such as Novartis, Vertex, Microsoft, EMC, Akamai, etc.
 
I'm totally in agreement with your point of view. I don't think, however, that taxes or red tape do anything to keep companies from starting up and growing.

I mean, politicians (ahem, Mayor Menino & Governor Patrick) think throwing money at these companies is wise economic policy. Perhaps for larger companies (I say no, but an argument could be made for it) but not for anyone starting out.

And I don't imagine the state of California can be a very low-regulation, low-tax state. NY, either.

Overall we are still doing ok in start-ups --- Despite the high taxes, rediculusous regulations and rolls of red tape -- a lot of the best and brightest still want to start right here -- unfortunately not all of them stay to grow.
 
People don't go to Cali for the weather or the drinking. They go for the money. The attitude towards lending in Massachusetts has long been "Neither a Borrower nor a Lender Be." VC money is just easier to come by, and the human capital is there waiting to be exploited. Silicon Valley is like Google: if it's big enough and good enough, why go anywhere else?

I seriously doubt schools are a problem. Most people in tech start-ups are fairly young. With women having children so late now, it's a future problem for them. And it's not as if Silicon Valley was a cultural/economic mecca before it blew up. It was built on old orchards, and it was literally in the middle of nowhere as far as the urban tech-yuppie lifestyle goes. The restaurants and bars came later.

The regions greatest problem is that it was built out so long ago. There's no land to put up factories or office parks for small money now. If you were starting a new tech business and you could go anywhere, where would Boston be on your list? Not for you, but for the company? I'd probably think Austin first if I had to rule out Silicon Valley. Boston would be on the second page.
 
Zuckerberg says Boston may be in Facebook’s future
Globe Staff
Could Facebook be coming to Boston?

Mark Zuckerberg, co-founder of Facebook, confirmed the possibility today at Harvard University, where he made his first official visit since he dropped out of the school seven years ago to bring his online social media company to California’s Silicon Valley.

Asked by reporters when he might open an office in the Boston area, Zuckerberg said, “Hopefully at some point soon, but no plans in the near future.”

Zuckerberg said that Facebook would expand first in Seattle to get “the culture right” for its first satellite office before heading east. Facebook is headquartered in Palo Alto, Calif.

Before visiting Harvard, Zuckerberg stopped at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. At both schools, he met with students to scout potential employees and interns for Facebook.

About 100 students lined up at MIT for Zuckerberg’s noontime appearance, which was accessible only with a ticket. “I was lucky enough to get in,” said Rob McQueen, 22, a senior and computer science major. “I’ll be looking for jobs. Start-ups are the life for me.”

Before meeting with students at MIT, Zuckerberg made a brief appearance before the press, where he addressed his recent comments that if he were starting Facebook today, he would remain in Boston.

Zuckerberg said his remarks were meant to convey to start-ups that they don’t have to be in Silicon Valley to succeed. “There are so many smart people out here,” he said.

After the MIT talk, McQueen said he still wasn’t convinced Facebook is the place for him after graduation, preferring to find a small tech start-up so he can get the same kind of experience as Zuckerberg.

Zuckerberg stressed to students that Facebook gives its employees a chance to have a “big impact” -- a good argument to join the company, McQueen said, if if he isn’t buying Zuckerberg’s pitch personally. “It’s just cool to see him here,” McQueen said.

Students said that the Facebook chief executive didn’t say much that many didn’t already know about the massive social network. “It’s more significant that he’s here than what he said,” said freshman Austin Hess, 18.

Zuckerberg was an undergraduate in 2004 when with the help of friends, he founded Facebook in his dorm room.

He was unable to find financing from local venture capital firms. Some investors in Silicon Valley, Calif., were willing to fund Facebook, so he moved to Palo Alto, Calif., and dropped out of Harvard.

Today, Facebook has more than 800 million registered users, and is one of the most visited sites on the Internet.

These days, Harvard students refine their projects through events and classes offered by the school.

A number of projects are launched during the annual weeklong, midwinter “Hack Harvard’’ incubator program, when students are taught how to translate ideas into business models. A start-up competition, the Harvard Innovation Challenge, annually awards $10,000 to two projects. The introductory computer science course CS50 is now the second-most-popular class on campus, attracting more than 600 students. And in less than two weeks, the university is opening its Innovation Lab next to the Harvard Business School, with a mission to promote innovation and entrepreneurship campus-wide.

Harvard sophomore Zachary Hamed, who created a website that helps students prepare financial aid applications, is one of the students Zuckerberg may be looking for. A computer science major, Hamed created AidAide.com, a “TurboTax for financial aid,’’ during his freshman year. Last summer, he partnered with a Chicago-based start-up called Alltuition.com and accompanied the larger site’s team to an “accelerator’’ event called 500Startups in Palo Alto, California’s white-hot center of technological innovation.

“I loved it,’’ he said. “It was an infectious place to be.’’

At the end of the summer, Hamed could have stayed in Chicago and worked on his project. He decided to return to school. “I had more to learn here,’’ he said.

One factor that kept him at Harvard was its expanded commitment to entrepreneurship. This year, for example, Hamed is serving as a student coordinator at the Innovation Lab.

“It’s really a different environment from when Zuckerberg was here,’’ Hamed said. “He was working with his roommates in his dorm room; I’ve been able to work with an innovation lab. I’ve talked to venture capitalists; I’ve looked at term sheets. I have office space and people to work with.

“If Zuckerberg were here today, I bet he would have stayed a little longer,’’ he said.

http://www.boston.com/Boston/busine...uwwKARuarNoYcRFUA7MJ/index.html?p1=News_links
 

Back
Top