State Senate would create transportation superagency

Haha - "executive experience"! You missed the point 100% entirely!
 
I just never understand why somebody would buy a product with a slick marketing campaign but few tangible features. That's all I'm saying.

This is funny, after all the countless lectures on BRANDING that you've delivered on this message board.

And there is one 'r' in the president's first name. And you know that full well. You've done this before, and it wasn't funny then, either.
 
I just never understand why somebody would buy a product with a slick marketing campaign but few tangible features. That's all I'm saying.

Do you own an Ipod?

If so, well..... that's what we call irony.
 
^^ I was going to make an Apple joke, but I figured Ron would come in and start on about how feature rich they are and then we would go from a stupid political debate to a stupid Mac vs PC debate. :)
 
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

New MassDOT Super-Agency Opens Doors, With Few Changes

By MEGHNA CHAKRABARTI
Published November 2, 2009 UPDATED 11:24 AM

BOSTON ? THE NEW MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION opened its doors Sunday. It is widely hailed as one of the largest governmental reorganizations undertaken by the state in the past 50 years.

The transportation super-agency fuses the now-defunct Massachusetts Turnpike Authority, the MBTA and the Massachusetts Department of Transportation. It is now responsible for almost all roads, bridges and tunnels in the state.

However, immediate changes to the state transportation system will remain largely invisible to commuters and transit riders. One new feature of the MassDOT, as the agency is also known, is a new Web site and Twitter feed.

The agency was billed as the centerpiece of the ?reform before revenue? strategy to fix the state?s ailing transportation infrastructure. Senate President Therese Murray and Transportation Committee Co-Chairman Sen. Stephen Baddour said the efficiencies produced by the agency would save the state $6.2 billion over the next 20 years.

That claim has been downgraded. Jeffrey Mullan, the new secretary of transportation heading the formation of MassDOT, said the state will not achieve such savings.

?I like to be aspirational. I think that number?s a little high,? Mullan said. ?The numbers that we?ve got are largely in aligning health and welfare benefits. From my perspective, any savings in necessary, so we need to take care of the pennies because we spend a lot of them.?

The largest long-term savings were expected to emerge from a plan to trim MBTA employee benefits. Efforts to move T union members to the state?s group health insurance plan have stalled because the T?s unions have sued to stop the move.

In addition, Mullan hopes to eliminate wage discrepancies between employees at the former Turnpike Authority and the Massachusetts Highway Department. Those negotiations are ongoing.

Transportation finance experts now say overall savings are likely to be a fraction of original projections ? some $1 billion dollars over the next 20 years ? but even those savings are uncertain.

MASSDOT ALSO COMES INTO BEING UNDER A CLOUD OF CONTROVERSY over its governing board. Gov. Deval Patrick announced his appointments to the five-member board Friday. Three of the five appointments used to serve on the disbanded Turnpike and MBTA boards.

Janice Loux, head of the Unite Here! Local 26 union, served 12 years on the MBTA board. Ferdinand Alvaro, a lawyer, also served on the T board. John Jenkins is an insurance executive who was appointed by Patrick to the Turnpike board in October 2008. Jenkins will chair the new MassDOT board.

The state law governing the formation of MassDOT calls for board members with actual transportation, planning, and engineering experience.

The appointments drew enormous criticism from Baddour, who said in a statement that the board could potentially ?doom? transportation reform. Mike Widmer, former member of the independent Transportation Finance Commission and head of the Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation, said the appointments were a serious setback for the launch of MassDOT.

?The whole underpinning of the reform is to get an experienced board as part of a new united transportation agency,? Widmer said. ?Instead, three of the board members have recently served on two agencies that have been very troubled. So this is anything but a fresh start.?

Gov. Patrick said in a statement that he is ?confident they will get the job done.?

Patrick also appointed Andrew Whittle, head of the civil and environmental engineering department at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Elizabeth Levin, a management consultant focused on transportation.

The MassDOT board consolidates all the power and decision-making responsibility once held by the MBTA and Turnpike boards. Billions of dollars in construction contracts, thousands of employees and thousand of miles of state roads and railways will be under the MassDOT board?s control.

Revenue remains a dominant concern at the new agency. State funding to maintain existing roads, bridges and tunnels continues to fall $1 billion short every year.

Mullan said there will be no toll or T fare increases in the immediate future. However, he did not eliminate the possibility of such hikes in the future. Mullan also said the state needs to stay open to all potential future sources of transportation funding, including increases in the state gas tax.

A major top-to-bottom financial review of the MBTA was due also Nov. 1.

Click ?Listen Now? to hear WBUR?s Meghna Chakrabarti explain the changes to WBUR?s Bob Oakes.

Link
 
" The transportation super-agency fuses the now-defunct Massachusetts Turnpike Authority, the MBTA and the Massachusetts Department of Transportation. It is now responsible for almost all roads, bridges and tunnels in the state."

I dont remember, what happened with the Massport roads/bridges? Does massport give up their parking meter rein over south boston?

Did they take all the roads from the DCR? All the bridge projects are still listed in the DCR website, and no where else.
 
The MBTA is "defunct"? Does this mean some kind of rebranding of the T? I hope not.

Does it mean there's no agency fighting for money specifically for transit? Yes. Isn't that a problem? We now basically have one board that gets to decide how much money and priority to allocate to transit as opposed to roads.
 
I think the 'defunct' only refers to the Turnpike Auth.

Poorly phrased.
 
The T is the best brand Boston has. Honestly, from a design standpoint, that logo is rock solid. The company, on the other hand...
 
Looks like Minnesota is copying the T logo too...

Metro.jpg
 
Love that bus front in the window. That kind of creativity is very un-MBTA.
 
Pittsburgh also uses a variation of the circle-T. I don't think it's especially common, though.
 
I don't know how exhaustive this is, there may be better graphs out this. This was the 1st in a quick GIS:

transit-logos-of-the-world.jpg


Looks like the M is a lot more common.
 
whats the one that is the exact same at the T?

5 rows up from the bottom
5th from the left
 
whats the one that is the exact same at the T?

5 rows up from the bottom
5th from the left

I don't see any symbol that looks even a little like a T at that location.
 
Transportation payroll soared under Patrick

By Andrea Estes, Globe Staff | November 8, 2009

As Governor Deval Patrick merges the state?s transportation agencies in an attempt to reduce duplication and waste, a review of payroll records shows that his own administration presided over much of the growth in spending he must now rein in.

The two major transportation agencies more than doubled the number of six-figure jobs since Patrick won the governorship in 2006. Transportation secretaries under Patrick have been paid 25 percent more than in the prior administration. New appointees have been simply layered over old ones, with the displaced workers given new titles.

The result: The Executive Office of Transportation and Public Works and the Massachusetts Highway Department together saw a 20 percent surge in their payrolls under Patrick, according to state comptroller records obtained under open records laws. The boost in personnel costs came as the administration, which had pledged early on to reform the transportation system, was facing an increasingly difficult financial picture.

The current secretary of transportation, Jeffrey B. Mullan, said he is reviewing ?every seat in the house,?? evaluating each employee?s role within the new Department of Transportation, to make sure that ?everybody in the new DOT will have a job that lines up with the mission.??

?I?ve been involved in transportation for a long time,?? he said. ?I don?t think it?s ever been done before.??

While former governor Mitt Romney?s last transportation secretary, John Cogliano, had three deputies. Patrick?s first transportation secretary, Bernard Cohen, had six, and Cohen?s successor, James A. Aloisi Jr., had eight. While Cogliano earned $120,000 a year, Cohen and Aloisi each made $150,000, as does Mullan.

Since Romney?s last year in office, the number of officials in the Executive Office of Transportation and MassHighway earning at least $100,000 a year more than doubled, from 16 to 37, records show.

In several cases, Patrick allowed a new manager to bring in his own staff without getting rid of the predecessor?s key aides.

Aloisi, after taking office in January, chose his own chief of staff, Karen Charles, while the previous chief of staff, Amy Branger, continued to collect her $100,000-a-year salary. Branger was given several different titles, including ?assistant secretary for environmental coordination,?? and now holds the position of ?director of the office of transition management.??

Lily Mendez-Morgan, who had been a special assistant to the governor, became one of Aloisi?s eight deputies in January , taking on the responsibilities of Susan Quinones, who had been the director of interagency affairs. Quinones, as of July, continued to collect her $93,000-a-year salary and is now responsible for ?tracking federal funding and policy,?? a spokesman said; Mendez-Morgan, who is now ?deputy secretary for interagency management and reform,?? saw her pay bumped from $108,000 to $125,000 a year, records show.

Aloisi also brought in his own communications director, Colin Durrant, who was appointed to a $115,000-a-year deputy secretary position. Durrant?s predecessor, Klark Jessen, remains on the payroll, handling internal communications and blogging.

Among the highest-paid employees of either agency are hires that came with a political pedigree. Albert Shaw, a retiree who served on Patrick?s inaugural committee, was given a $115,000-a-year job as ?director of intergovernmental affairs.?? The fourth-highest-paid employee at MassHighway, Shaw was head of the Massachusetts Minority Business Roundtable and a former MBTA board member.

Mullan acknowledged there have been multiple people with the same or similar duties. ?This is one of the things we?re working on,?? he said.

Cohen did not return a phone message; Aloisi could not be reached for comment.

Administration officials say many employees were hired at MassHighway to handle the governor?s new Accelerated Bridge Program, a $3.8 billion blueprint to repair more than 400 deteriorating bridges over eight years.

Durrant said that when Patrick became governor, the highway department was ?so severely understaffed?? it could not handle urgent construction projects and was cited for the deficiency by federal highway officials.

?Since that time, we?ve had an unprecedented investment in the statewide road and bridge program and the Accelerated Bridge Program and over $400 million in [federal] stimulus money, all to repair our roads and bridges and undo decades of neglect,?? he said. ?The vast majority of people who have come on board have been professional engineers, inspectors, and maintenance personnel who are critical to moving projects quickly and ensuring the sort of oversight of taxpayer-funded projects that is necessary.??

Some critics say the administration has added layers of managers without regard to the state?s financial condition.

Senator Mark C. Montigny, a New Bedford Democrat who chairs the Committee on Bonding, Capital Expenditures and State Assets, said Patrick should have imposed a hiring freeze.

?For a year now many of us in both parties have said we need a complete hiring freeze, but we haven?t seen it yet,?? said Montigny, who opposed creating a new transportation agency. ?Anyone who?s come on recently - those positions need to be scrutinized. If we got along fine without them before, we can get along fine without them now.??

Still, Montigny said he had ?full faith in this governor,?? adding: ?He wants to do the right thing. But transportation is such a big monster, it?s really difficult for even a very smart guy to get his arms around. It?s like turning around a tanker in the middle of a pond.??

Senate minority leader Richard R. Tisei, a Republican and a top supporter of Patrick?s chief GOP rival in next year?s governor?s race, Charles D. Baker, said the administration has been irresponsible in its hiring.

?A lot of the jobs that have been created haven?t been on the ground level, where services are being provided. They?re at the top of the organization charts,?? Tisei said. ?Now that we?re in a fiscal crisis, all these positions are adding up and dragging down the whole state budget.??

Late last month, with state tax revenues missing expectations, Patrick said he would close an estimated $600 million budget gap this fiscal year in part by eliminating nearly 1,000 jobs. The Department of Transportation?s budget will be cut by $13.5 million, Durrant said, with reductions in the snow and ice removal and overtime budgets. Managers will be asked to take furloughs.

Patrick?s handling of the budget has become a central issue in the nascent 2010 gubernatorial campaign: His three challengers - Baker; another Republican, Christy Mihos; and state Treasurer Timothy P. Cahill, running as an independent - have all sought to capitalize politically on the state?s budget woes.

Two weeks ago, Cahill said he had warned Patrick and legislative leaders in 2008 to keep spending down, but was ignored. And while the administration says it has eliminated jobs and reduced spending, Cahill said he saw no evidence of that.

Administration officials disputed Cahill?s assertion, saying more than 1,600 jobs had been cut and 761 people laid off. They also said the number of executive branch employees had decreased over the past two years.

The payroll records also show that more than 80 percent of MassHighway?s nearly 2,000 employees are paid out of the state?s capital budget and funded through bonds. In a parting letter Aloisi wrote to Patrick last month, he called this method ?a wasteful and duplicitous practice designed to hide the real cost of our workforce while seriously shortchanging our statewide road and bridge programs.?? He blamed the Legislature for failing to transfer the payroll costs to the regular operating budget.

http://www.boston.com/news/local/ma...ortation_payroll_soared_under_patrick?mode=PF

Now we know for sure why both transportation agencies are in the negative. Corruption...
 

Back
Top