Stimulus Money

Could you explain credit default swaps for me?

Here are several paragraphs from a NY Times article last November.

In a credit-default swap, a buyer of protection pays an insurance premium to a seller who agrees to cover any lost interest or principal on bonds or loans issued by companies, countries or other organizations.

The buyers and sellers are typically securities firms, hedge funds, banks and insurance companies.

Policy makers have been unnerved by the rise of the market because they are worried that sellers of protection may not have enough reserves to pay future claims and that default by one party could lead to a cascade of failures throughout the financial system. That fear led the Federal Reserve to extend an $85 billion bridge loan to the American International Group and prompted the Fed to arrange a sale of Bear Stearns to JPMorgan Chase. Both A.I.G. and Bear Stearns had bought and sold billions in swaps.

Industry officials, however, have argued that while the total amount of credit-default swaps appears large, many of the contracts offset one another. Many players in the market hedged their positions so if they had bought protection in one transaction they would sell it in another.
For more discussion, albeit a bit technical and jargoned, see this commentary on CDSs and Bear Stearns (BSC) posted in April 2008.

http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/credit-default-swaps-and-bank-leverage.html

For the current size of the CDS market and its recent growth, see:
http://www.bis.org/statistics/otcder/dt1920a.pdf

CDS did not exist before 1997. Their notional value was modest until about 2003, when notional values took on a nearly vertical slope.
 
Last edited:
Here are several paragraphs from a NY Times article last November.

For more discussion, albeit a bit technical and jargoned, see this commentary on CDSs and Bear Stearns (BSC) posted in April 2008.

http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/credit-default-swaps-and-bank-leverage.html

For the current size of the CDS market and its recent growth, see:
http://www.bis.org/statistics/otcder/dt1920a.pdf

CDS did not exist before 1997. Their notional value was modest until about 2003, when notional values took on a nearly vertical slope.

Summary: Insurance with a different name as to not fall under insurance regulations
 
There is a fantastic graphic here which maps out where all this money is going. Needless to say it is discouraging that highways are getting as much as they are, though I have to imagine that most of that is repair work that desperatly needs to be done.
 
Some highways would be essential infrastructure whether the US was such an auto-dominated society or not (see: Germany). And so many of them are festering in relative decrepitude. Been on the Cross-Bronx lately?
 
Wouldn't it have been great it they had taken the Kazillion dollars and built a coast to coast Mag-Lev system instead of piddling it off here and there and leaving nothing to show in five years?
 
Boston Globe
Patrick taps real estate developer to oversee federal stimulus spending in Mass.

By Matt Viser, Globe Staff | February 12, 2009

Governor Deval Patrick appointed a real estate developer yesterday to oversee the federal stimulus money that will soon flow into Massachusetts.

Jeffrey A. Simon, president of the Boston-based real estate development firm Simon Properties, will be the director of infrastructure investment and will establish a bidding process for projects funded by the plan, ensure that the distribution is transparent, and prepare a method for determining which projects to fund, Patrick said.

With billions on its way to the state from the federal stimulus package, competition, infighting, and squabbling have already begun over how the state should spend its share.

"We can spend all day on who owns what road - the public doesn't care," Patrick said yesterday at a State House news conference. "The public sees a rugged road, a pothole, a broken bridge; they don't care whether it's a state road or municipal facility. We have got to go where the need is greatest, where we're going to put the most people to work quickly."

Following yesterday's announcement that leaders in the US House and Senate had come to terms on a $789 billion federal stimulus package, state officials were trying to determine how much federal money will come to Massachusetts.

Most of the money will be distributed through existing federal formulas to interests such as Medicaid and education. Patrick estimated yesterday that $1 billion to $2 billion would be dedicated specifically to Massachusetts for infrastructure improvements, including mass transit, broadband access, and highway and bridge construction and repair.

State legislators also announced yesterday that they are forming a committee to oversee and review how the state spends the federal funds. The joint committee will review current state laws and regulations, hold hearings, and make recommendations.

Simon is a senior real estate professional with 30 years' experience. He also has been serving as part-time executive chairman of Actus Lend Lease, a Nashville development firm that specializes in the creation of master-planned communities and partnerships of public and private concerns.

Simon oversaw the redevelopment of several closed military bases, including Fort Devens in Massachusetts and four bases in Bermuda. "We're going to put people back to work building worthwhile projects that will benefit us all in the future," Simon said yesterday. "We will do this with openness, honesty, and professionalism."

The governor said information would be posted on the state's website today detailing the state and local projects that have been proposed for funding and could begin almost immediately. The state will also use the website - www.mass.gov/recovery - to offer details on every project, including the bidding contractors, and progress reports.

"An ounce of prevention in handling this money correctly is worth a pound of grand jury investigations and civil litigation down the road," said Attorney General Martha Coakley. We will "make sure that we take our lessons from the past and not repeat the same mistakes."

Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Aside from the basic absurdity of hiring someone to help the state spend money, how many Simon properties are accessible via rapid transit vs how many are dependent on auto infrastructure?
 
The job of the governor is to oversee the legislative branch, in particular to be the vetoing watchdog for spending. So, if Deval is going to go and hire ANOTHER EXPENSIVE CONSULTANT TO DO HIS JOB, can't he do us all a favor and resign already or at least not take his salary?
 
Is this the same Simon company that owns Copley Place and other malls?
 
Yup.

Though from reading the article it sounds like he is no longer affiliated with the company.

Edit: Maybe not. According to the website Simon Properties, Inc is headquartered out of Indiana. So I guess it is a different Simon Properties? Or the Globe is wrong and it's not based out of Boston. I can't find a web listing for a Boston-based Simon Properties.
 
^^ Great 6b to cover the T's debt and 2.4b for new capital projects!

Oh...
 
I still say: Drop the whole stimulus wad on coast to coast Mag-Lev.
 
Some highways would be essential infrastructure whether the US was such an auto-dominated society or not (see: Germany). And so many of them are festering in relative decrepitude. Been on the Cross-Bronx lately?

The Cross Bronx was already decrepit a few decades ago. If it got any worse, I can't begin to imagine....

Lurker, you crack me up. Always. :cool:

This entire stimulus package is rot. I'm disgusted with my country right now. Not learning. Not getting it. Leaves me wishing my family's dual citizenship was transferrable to subsquent generations. :eek: Did I say that out loud? Heh.
 
Mass. could get $11.7b from stimulus
High-speed rail gets boost
By Matt Viser and Michael Kranish
Globe Staff / February 14, 2009

Massachusetts will receive at least $11.7 billion under the federal stimulus package approved yesterday by Congress, providing a significant infusion to plug a growing state budget gap, spur transportation projects, and provide residents with tax relief, medical care, unemployment checks, and other benefits.

About 79,000 jobs would be created or saved in Massachusetts as a result of the federal stimulus, according to a summary distributed by US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

The state could also benefit significantly from a surprise decision by the House-Senate conferees to quadruple, to $8 billion, funding for high-speed rail projects. While it is too early to say how much would go to the improvement of the Northeast Corridor rail line, US Senator John F. Kerry said yesterday that Massachusetts will be in line for a substantial amount of funding.

The money could be used to bring the existing Acela line up to the 150-mile-per-hour maximum through track improvements, bridge and tunnel construction, and other projects.

Kerry said the definition of "high speed" was left broad enough to leave open the possibility that funding could also be used for commuter rail service to New Bedford and from Lowell to Concord, N.H.

Kerry had cosponsored an amendment for $2 billion in rail improvements, but Senate majority leader Harry Reid of Nevada, who wants a high-speed line to run from Los Angeles to Las Vegas, quadrupled that amount.

"It is huge, not just for Massachusetts, but on a national basis," Kerry said in a telephone interview. "It is the down payment on the move toward a genuine high-speed rail structure in the country. For us in New England, it means we can do the real work of modernizing the track, so we can get the 150 miles per hour" of maximum speed offered by the Acela trains.

Kerry estimated that such a high-speed line could cut travel time from Boston to New York to about 2 1/2 hours and travel time from New York to Washington to about two hours.

The development was greeted with cheers in Boston City Hall. "Modernizing transit is not just good for the economy; it's great for the environment," said Dot Joyce, a spokeswoman for Mayor Thomas M. Menino. "He fully supports anything that would improve the Acela service to Boston."

State officials and the Massachusetts congressional delegation were still adding up the amount of stimulus that would reach the state yesterday. While it was difficult to determine payout precisely, the state stands to gain at least $11.7 billion, most of it over the next two years, according to the Center for American Progress, a Washington-based advocacy group that supported the bill.

About $5 billion of that would go to residents through tax cuts and other adjustments, such as changes in the alternative minimum tax.

The $11.7 billion figure could rise significantly if the state is able to win other funding that will be allocated for various science, technology, and health programs.

"There's going to be an innovation competition," US Representative Edward J. Markey, a Malden Democrat, said in an interview. "And I think Massachusetts has a comparative advantage. Many of these projects are technology-oriented, and that's going to be our advantage. The green revolution can't be kick-started without Eastern Massachusetts."

The state would receive $1.7 billion in Medicaid funding, according to estimates by the Center for American Progress. A separate analysis by the Massachusetts Budget and Policy Center cited a much higher estimate for Medicaid money, $3.1 billion.

Other direct benefits to state government include $990 million to help reduce the state's deficit and stem further budget cuts and nearly $800 million in extra funding for education, including $230 million in Pell Grants for college students. The state would also receive about $240 million for clean energy and weatherization projects and $947 million for roads, bridges, and water infrastructure improvements.

State officials have compiled a list of more than 8,000 infrastructure projects, totaling $28 billion, and now must begin to decide which of those would create the most jobs and best help to revive the state's economy. That process will begin almost immediately.

House and Senate lawmakers also agreed yesterday to keep a controversial House provision that provided $50 million to the National Endowment for the Arts. Some Republicans had said the money would not create enough jobs and tried unsuccessfully to shift the funds to road construction. But proponents prevailed in the effort to keep the money, which they said would help artists, actors, and others in the arts to keep their jobs or get new positions.

The Massachusetts Cultural Council would probably get about $400,000, which would be redistributed to various groups and artists, and a similar amount would be sent directly from the NEA to individuals and groups in the Bay State. The funding would help make up for a proposed $600,000 cut in the council's state funding.

"We're grateful that the president and Congress recognized that the arts are an important sector of our economy that is worth investing in," said Gregory Liakos, a spokesman for the Massachusetts Cultural Council.

http://www.boston.com/news/local/ma.../14/mass_could_get_117b_from_stimulus/?page=2
 
I just heard that there really IS money in the stimulation package for a Mag-Lev system. Boston-NY? No. NY-Chicago? No. San Francisco-LA? No. Drum-roll, please....Anaheim to Las Vegas. $8 billion. Put in by Harry Reid himself.
 
I fully expect this money to evaporate due to graft before anything of merit is completed.

An analogy:
The projects are a beautiful woman at a bar, the stimulus money is one foolishly pulling out the credit card woo her. The end result is the same; she's gone, she really wasn't worth it, and one is now hopelessly in debt.

Obama's a pimp, Pelosi's a madame, Reid's the transporter, and we as a nation just got hustled.
 
This does NOT look good.



Btw, is the Blue Line extension to Charles shovel-ready?
 

Back
Top