He’s not being unfair. I have issues with the development itself from the planning and development to the renders, and the neighbors have legitimate concerns. Not every neighbor is trying to stand in the way of fun time for us development nerds. They need to go back to the drawing board.
He’s not being unfair. I have issues with the development itself from the planning and development to the renders, and the neighbors have legitimate concerns. Not every neighbor is trying to stand in the way of fun time for us development nerds. They need to go back to the drawing board.
Seeing that I don’t live in East Boston, I don’t know. You’d have to ask the residents. 95% of the time, I’m anti-NIMBY. This is not one of those times.In your opinion what are these legitimate concerns? I'm asking because going back to the drawing board is code for massive delays and nothing gets built, so what exactly is so flawed with the project as to need that drastic remedy?
Seeing that I don’t live in East Boston, I don’t know. You’d have to ask the residents. 95% of the time, I’m anti-NIMBY. This is not one of those times.
I have a feeling Suffolk Downs will drastically increase the prices in Eastie which will drive out the population there. Gentrification at it's finest. Thats what Bernie means.
That will happen regardless. I didn't like the Amazon version of this project because I thought it would create new demand for people to live in Eastie without providing enough housing, forcing the employees into the neighborhood. This project provides lots of its own housing.
HYM can't prevent rents from going up in Eastie, but it can build more housing stock for the new tech workers paying those higher rents.
Equilibria --this is a new Neighborhood -- call it Suffolk -- its not the traditional Eastie nor is it the Tiffany Revere CoastThat will happen regardless. I didn't like the Amazon version of this project because I thought it would create new demand for people to live in Eastie without providing enough housing, forcing the employees into the neighborhood. This project provides lots of its own housing.
HYM can't prevent rents from going up in Eastie, but it can build more housing stock for the new tech workers paying those higher rents.
Massachoisetts -- No nothing of any significance has started. The developer is still renting out the old Suffolk Downs grounds for events all summerGood thought on that. I didnt like Amazon there either. I would just rather see atleast 10,000 units with at least 2,500 deemed affordable. Construction/groundwork started here correct?
Personally, my distaste for the current proposal is so abject that I don't really care what banner is flown towards the idea that this thing needs to go.
My other is from Eastie, and we go there from time to time. I hear her describe how "it was", and it was all about backyards (like who had one), the corner store, families. Working families. The general complaint there is not a NIMBY complaint as much as it is a final breaking point for these families, because that part of Eastie is being forced even closer to the margin. As proposed, this thing is the nail in the coffin. I do not think a single other community of similar size anywhere in the Commonwealth would tolerate anything like this, nor should they have to.
This should be a high density residential neighborhood. West of Beachmont station should be grided immediately.
I truly hope that the idea that "neighborhoods" are where family's live does not pin me as nostalgic. This is an office park on steroids, with housing to help feed the mill.I'm not sure the standard for developing a defunct horse racing track should be that it turns back the clock 40 years. Nobody gets to live in the place they grew up in unless they purchase a home which gives them the right to stay put. Nothing against you personally but it drives me nuts when NIMBY'ism is the result of people wishing the past was still the present.
Cortes -- no you can't put up 10 300 footers. You can find places on the Suffolk Downs property where you can go to 200 ft. However, there is absolutely no reason to do so for residences. All the rest of East Boston and all of Revere and Winthrop except on the shoreline is 4 or 5 stories or less. Note -- so is much of the Back Bay.Also, when I say high density, what's the FAA's take on the area. If I just concede on the "equity" rant, could you put 8 or 10 300 footers within a 10 min walk from Beachmont? Could you actually create an East Boston Centre?
The legitimate concerns are outlined in this article.In your opinion what are these legitimate concerns? I'm asking because going back to the drawing board is code for massive delays and nothing gets built, so what exactly is so flawed with the project as to need that drastic remedy?