The Official MBTA System Map

TheRatmeister said:
View attachment 58013
Alright, made some updates.
Click to expand...
This is probably outside your scope, but on these line diagrams I wish there was some indication which regional rail lines a stop connects with, rather than just using the purple rectangle for all of them. I can see it would be tough to squeeze all the names in at South Station or even Quincy, and I don't have any good suggestions. This bothers me on the current full map too.

If/when the T really commits to regional rail with high frequency, all-day service, I think the regional rail lines could really use their own individual branding. Maybe with numbers, letters, or colors. But that's a pretty massive graphical redesign for the whole network.
 
ritchiew said:
This is probably outside your scope, but on these line diagrams I wish there was some indication which regional rail lines a stop connects with, rather than just using the purple rectangle for all of them. I can see it would be tough to squeeze all the names in at South Station or even Quincy, and I don't have any good suggestions. This bothers me on the current full map too.

If/when the T really commits to regional rail with high frequency, all-day service, I think the regional rail lines could really use their own individual branding. Maybe with numbers, letters, or colors. But that's a pretty massive graphical redesign for the whole network.
Click to expand...
I 100% agree but without just writing out the names of the lines there's not much I can do. As far as I can tell there's no current short-form or abbreviation for the lines.
 
TheRatmeister said:
I 100% agree but without just writing out the names of the lines there's not much I can do. As far as I can tell there's no current short-form or abbreviation for the lines.
Click to expand...
The consolidated BOS <> Readville and BOS <> Braintree schedules use abbreviations (for the origination point, not technically the line).

1732150814424.png

1732150836986.png
 
HenryAlan said:
I don't know whether you are making an editorial comment about the quality of Silver Line transfer, but the MBTA considers Chinatown to be a transfer point and shows it that way on their maps.
Click to expand...
BNRD makes Chinatown an inbound stop only without looping like the current SL4/5, so I've opted not to show it.
 
I think those look great! A few stray notes:
  • I like the walking transfers, though I agree with Van that they need to be explicitly indicated in the legend
  • I also think you have sufficient space to include some indication of the walking time; Reservoir <> Cleveland Circle basically is a direct transfer, and it seems worth distinguishing that
  • I like the first version, where the branches are indicated with their standalone icons (this also solves the problem of marking the B/C terminus at GC)
  • I'm not sure how I feel about the bus icons being on the opposite side as the labels; I think it worked pretty well on the Red Line map, but I think it's a bit less clear, especially with stations like Symphony on diagonal segments
  • I think you should mark the Winter Street Concourse or otherwise indicate an Orange transfer at Park
    • Especially for B/C riders, the Winter Street Concourse makes it possible to transfer to Orange without leaving fare control or waiting for a D/E to take you one stop from GC to Haymarket
  • You could also include a walking transfer to Back Bay -- there is precedent for its inclusion (higher res at link)
    • 1732467700416.png
  • You've marked a 39 transfer at Heath St, but haven't included a similar B <> 57 transfer at Babcock (or Packards Corner)
  • Also, and I appreciate that this is the absolute fiddliest pickiest of feedback... but technically there isn't actually an E <> 39 transfer at Heath
  • Fascinatingly, a lot of the E <> 39 transfers are actually pretty poor
    • South of Brigham Circle, Green Line trains run far away from the curb -- not ideal for transfers
    • Brigham Circle's eastbound Green Line platform is right next to the 39's stop at Wigglesworth (good) but its westbound platform is notably farther from the corresponding 39 stop (less good)
    • Longwood Medical Area seems to have the strongest transfer point -- the 39's stops are directly across the street from the Green Line platforms, immediately accessible via crosswalk
    • MFA and Northeastern each have one E <> 39 transfer that requires crossing the street twice (unless scramble signaling is in place)
    • Symphony straight-up does not have a 39 stop
    • Prudential's eastbound stops align well, but its westbound 39 stop is about 300 feet from the subway entrance, on the opposite side of Belvidere St
    • There's a good eastbound 39 <> E transfer at Copley, but going westbound the 39's stop is 380 feet form the subway entrance, on the far side of Copley, requiring two street crossings
(Well, the rabbit hole of E <> 39 transfers was not one I expected to fall down today!)
 
Riverside said:
Also, and I appreciate that this is the absolute fiddliest pickiest of feedback... but technically there isn't actually an E <> 39 transfer at Heath
Click to expand...
I am aware of this, it's an error on the official map as well. However, a goal of the E-Branch transitway extension project is to also be used by the 39, I'm betting that the new Heath St stop will serve both.

Your other points are all good and I'll take them into account with a new revision.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top