The Vale Boston (Kraft Foods Redevelopment) | Woburn

The residential portion of the original plan to the south is largely complete, including the senior living community, townhomes, and apartments. All in that's about 420 units I believe. I don't know what the breakdown is for the 500 that are being proposed now. I recall the Woburn fire department had some issues due to access originally. The only way to get in and out of the overall development (the residential already built and the undeveloped portion) is a single road at the Montvale/93 intersection. But I agree commercial vs residential tax base would cause Woburn to push back some.
https://homenewshere.com/middlesex_east/article_603d6443-ef64-42b0-a707-e957a460f06b.html

My reading of this is that the breakdown is 100% 55+.
At the outset of this year, representatives from Boston real-estate developer Leggat McCall ... approached the City Council to ask permission to swap out a planned 1 million square foot life sciences campus with an age-restricted condominium development containing 504 dwelling units.

Officials from PulteGroup, which would market the home ownership units strictly to persons over age 55

and on the tax revenue side:

Officials ... say the redevelopment would generate $2.6 million in net new tax revenues

For example, former City Council President and Ward 3 Councilor Jeffrey Dillon has argued that rather than pushing for a commercial redevelopment in the middle of a market downturn, Leggat McCall and PulteGroup have teamed up to pitch a reasonable alternative that will reduce traffic impacts and still bring in a comparable amount of new tax revenues.

So it doesn't look like this would be a big step down from the life sciences dev in terms of revenue, but leaving the site vacant for a decade definitely would be...
 
Nobody has mentioned access. There's only one way in or out, which is by the McDonald's. There is no connection down to Sunset or Forest so every single additional car is going to come out to this one light on an already brutal section of Montvale.

If they're planning on connecting one of the streets to Sunset or Forest I could see that actually being a reason to oppose, but only if that person happens to be living in that immediate area. If they're NOT planning on connecting the streets and it's all based on one access point then I could see a broader reason to oppose, based on traffic considerations. Personally I think connecting Archer to Forest is the way to go. Forest also has easy connections to 93 so connecting this development to there would go a long way towards easing traffic concerns.

View attachment 71596
Is there an adverse grade to connect into Erie Street or Grape Street? Maybe the impact on or bridging over the Aberjona River that was that deciding factor. But I would agree that not connecting this development in from the get go was a pretty bad idea. Even with the original lab plan, only having a single access point seems short sighted.
Winchester denied that request as part of the original plan by the developer. Archer currently ends at the Woburn border.
(creating an echo chamber) whhhhyyyyyy???? I love living in MA again, but am utterly amazed at how non-location specific bad planning/NIMBYism can be.
 
(creating an echo chamber) whhhhyyyyyy????
That area is zoned single‑family residential in Winchester, and the town’s position was that Forest Street was never designed for emergency staging, through traffic, or development generated trips with the assumption being at the time that majority of the residents would be using it for primary access to the southern residential portion of the development. Winchester had no obligation to provide access for a project that’s entirely in Woburn. Beyond zoning, the issue was straightforward: the development would generate no tax revenue for Winchester, but the town would absorb the majority of the traffic, safety, and infrastructure impacts.

In Mass, towns aren’t required to open streets, allow new intersections, or accommodate development in a neighboring community. And even if a developer owns the land, you can’t use property in one zoning district to provide access to uses that wouldn’t be allowed there. Those rules apply across town lines, not just within a single town.
 
Last edited:
Winchester had no obligation to provide access for a project that’s entirely in Woburn. Beyond zoning, the issue was straightforward: the development would generate no tax revenue for Winchester, but the town would absorb the majority of the traffic, safety, and infrastructure impacts.
Why couldn't Woburn enter into a legally binding agreement with Winchester to pay them x dollars per year for impacts to Winchester's streets that the new housing area would create?
 
Winchester had no obligation to provide access for a project that’s entirely in Woburn. Beyond zoning, the issue was straightforward: the development would generate no tax revenue for Winchester, but the town would absorb the majority of the traffic, safety, and infrastructure impacts.
Exactly.
 
Why couldn't Woburn enter into a legally binding agreement with Winchester to pay them x dollars per year for impacts to Winchester's streets that the new housing area would create?
It’s likely that they tried to work something out. Someone mentioned Grape and Erie streets, which are completely in Woburn. That would have made the most sense, especially Erie street where they could have transformed part of the commercial lot at the end of the road to extend further right up to the new Began Wy.
 
That area is zoned single‑family residential in Winchester, and the town’s position was that Forest Street was never designed for emergency staging, through traffic, or development generated trips with the assumption being at the time that majority of the residents would be using it for primary access to the southern residential portion of the development. Winchester had no obligation to provide access for a project that’s entirely in Woburn. Beyond zoning, the issue was straightforward: the development would generate no tax revenue for Winchester, but the town would absorb the majority of the traffic, safety, and infrastructure impacts.

In Mass, towns aren’t required to open streets, allow new intersections, or accommodate development in a neighboring community. And even if a developer owns the land, you can’t use property in one zoning district to provide access to uses that wouldn’t be allowed there. Those rules apply across town lines, not just within a single town.
So what appears to boil down to is politics over society, that's very unfortunate and again, shortsighted (IMO). I understand the "no obligation" arguement, but that doesn't make it a good one. There is what appears to be a fire access road there already and I would say Forest appears to be a major East/West connector from Main Street Stoneham to Highland Street/Washington Street.
It’s likely that they tried to work something out. Someone mentioned Grape and Erie streets, which are completely in Woburn. That would have made the most sense, especially Erie street where they could have transformed part of the commercial lot at the end of the road to extend further right up to the new Began Wy.
I mentioned those two streets in my original post. Looking at Woburn GIS, that would've required crossing a recognized waterway ( at least twice) and buying privately owned land to provide such a connection. No idea if the sewer easements would play a factor (presumably minimal), but that would have been much more expensive for a development to incur and as a result drive up the cost of the housing.
1774531545406.png


GIS confirms the emergency access road coming from Woburn on to the site, with a lot of topographic challenge.
1774531674891.png

1774531946878.png


I know the hurdles that developers go through just to get some of these projects off the ground, and this development team appears to have gone through a ton for the Life Science component, but a town being argumentative about change of uses when the markets change or a minor road connection is a tough pill to swallow when there are already a lot of pills to swallow within the industry.
 
GIS confirms the emergency access road coming from Woburn on to the site, with a lot of topographic challenge.
While an unpaved path exists near there, it is not an approved emergency access road, was never authorized by Winchester, and is not used by fire departments for access to the development. Even in an emergency, fire departments are not allowed to rely on an unapproved, non‑compliant route like that unpaved path; it doesn't meet fire‑access standards. The Vale was approved on the basis that all required access exists within Woburn.
but a town being argumentative about change of uses when the markets change or a minor road connection
By that logic, Woburn could just as easily take the property at the end of Erie and Grape and dispense with neighborhood and environmental objections altogether, citing the broader public benefit.
 

Back
Top