Walking in Boston

JoeGallows

Active Member
Joined
May 25, 2006
Messages
171
Reaction score
0
I wanted to post this article from Radio Boston but couldn't find a thread about this in this subforum.

Boston Crosswalk Buttons Don?t Do Anything! Except When They Do

BOSTON ? When you?re waiting to cross the street, do you press that little button to request a walk sign? I do, but I?ve always been suspicious of it, especially in Boston.

The buttons around here (you know, the spherical metal knobs) always feel broken to me; not very springy and always a little out of alignment in the socket. And of course, they don?t beep or light up or do anything else to visibly register your input.

Sure, I eventually get a walk sign, but I feel like I usually do even when I don?t hit the button.

So, does the button do anything or not? I asked John DeBenedictis, director of engineering at the Boston Transportation Department, and the answer is surprisingly complicated. It all depends on when and where you hit that button.

?Downtown district, Back Bay, Beacon Hill, et cetera ? Financial District. Most of them are automatically set for pedestrian call during the hours of 7 a.m. to 7 p.m.,? DeBenedictis told me.

That means the pedestrian walk signal is automatically part of the traffic light cycle during those hours. If you?ve ever frantically flipped the button on the way to your noon meeting at the Hancock Tower, you were wasting calories, my friend.

?It?s not going to hurt anything,? he said. ?But it?s not going to put a call in, because the call has been automatically made through our traffic signal control system.?

What?s more, the system governs every single intersection in the city independently. Each one has its own rules.

Over at the corner of Massachusetts Avenue and Beacon Street, the pedestrian buttons are ineffective between 7 a.m. and 6 p.m. Monday through Friday, and 9 to 6 on the weekends. At the corner of Washington and Newton in the South End, the buttons don?t do anything until after 11 at night. At Stuart and Dartmouth in the Back Bay, the buttons never do anything. Ever. Neither do the ones at Mass. Ave and Columbus, or Dartmouth and Huntington.

So, why not just leave the button on all the time?

?It?s a numbers game,? DeBenedictis told me. ?We know that there are going to be pedestrians at virtually every single cycle during the day (at certain intersections),? so he figures it?s more convenient to just put the signals on an automatic cycle, and turn the buttons off. People get a walk sign whether they ask for it or not.

Logical as this system may sound, it drives some people crazy, like my friend Ken Kruckemeyer, transportation consultant and a longtime booster of biking and walking.

?The cars don?t have to push a button,? he told me. ?They?re automatically acknowledged by the system to have a right to go when it?s their turn. People ought to be given that option also.?

To illustrate his point, Kruckemeyer took me to his most hated intersection in all of Boston: the corner of Park and Tremont streets, right outside Park Street Station. When we met there during a recent evening rush hour, the walk button on the southeast corner of the intersection was hidden behind newspaper boxes, and no one seemed to be looking for it.

?It probably shows that people have learned here that pushing the button doesn?t make a darn bit of difference,? Kruckemeyer said. ?And that?s one of the really confusing things in Boston. Sometimes it does make a difference; you?ll never get a walk light unless you push it. So, we have all kinds of different things going on but there?s no feedback from the button that tells you anything so you know what to do.?

All over the country, pedestrian advocates like Kruckemeyer have been opposed to these buttons for years, not just because they can be confusing. These groups argue that a button functions as a placebo: Like a little stress toy, it provides a place for walkers to channel their frustrations as they wait ? and wait.

This leads me to the real reason Ken Kruckemeyer hates the intersection of Park and Tremont. ?93 percent of the time you?re faced with a ?don?t walk? sign, or a flashing ?don?t walk,?? he said.

The traffic light cycle there is 100 seconds, which is a little long for a downtown intersection in a city like Boston. (Most of the cycles in Manhattan last 90 seconds, and cycles in Philadelphia are usually 60.)

Kruckemeyer and I waited for our walk sign, and almost as soon as we started to cross, the pedestrian signal started flashing ?Don?t Walk.?

This is one of the busiest intersections in the city for pedestrians, with about 20,000 Red and Green Line riders popping down to the T station everyday. And even with the walk signal on an automatic cycle?which is supposed to help walkers?pedestrians only get a seven-second walk sign, followed by an 11-second flashing ?Don?t Walk.? Cars get the remaining 82 seconds all to themselves.

Kruckemeyer says the long light cycle, tiny walk period, and iffy pedestrian buttons make this intersection and dozens like it in Boston the worst of all worlds for pedestrians.

But as is so often the case, everything is different on the other side of the river.

In Cambridge, a walk button will always ?make sure that the walk phase that you?re asking for doesn?t get skipped,? Cambridge transportation director Susan Clippinger told me.

Clippinger?s office is around the corner from my place in Central Square, and when we went for a walk the other day we actually had trouble finding a pedestrian button to talk about.

?Generally we try not to do the button,? she said. ?The button is a thing that allows you to give vehicles more time.?

And prioritizing vehicles is not what they?re all about in Cambridge.

What they are all about is keeping the whole light cycle brief. So, you may still get a really short walk sign like the one that annoys Ken Krukemeyer over by Park Street, but at least you?ll get it more often.

?So we?re not being pedestrian-friendly by necessarily making a walk long longer than it needs to be,? Clippinger said. ?What we?re doing is trying to make the time when you can?t walk shorter, because that?s the time when it?s most annoying.?

I told Radio Boston host Meghna Chakrabarti about all this as we waited to cross the street at the corner of Longwood and Brookline Ave.

?It?s during that annoying time when I and, I suspect, many other Bostonians start to contemplate committing a crime,? she says.

Jaywalking?

?Yes,? she says. ?And now when I?m in downtown Boston, I?m never going to know if pressing the walk button did anything, so I?ll feel like I have no choice but to take matters into my own hands.?

Herein lies one of the arguments against pedestrian buttons, especially buttons that are only effective some of the time. The theory goes: Any time people feel like they don?t understand the system, they?re more likely to give up on the system and cross whenever they can, walk sign or not.

[Link - Has map of placebo buttons]

My theory for one of the reasons jaywalking is so prevalent in the city is simply because most pedestrian signals are neither automatic or (most importantly) predictable in either downtown or its outer neighborhoods. That, or the lights just don't make sense, again going against predictability.

Take this intersection at Babcock & Comm. Ave along the B line. Traffic turning right has a green arrow and pedestrians walking east along Comm. Ave. have no walk signal at all. Who has right of way? The green arrow would suggest the car, but the absence of a walk signal (for those walking across Babcock) would suggest the pedestrian, no? Immediately after the Comm. Ave. lights all go red, the Babcock St. lights go green making it at least slightly clear that cars now have the right of way over that crossing. Sort of. It would seem the pedestrian never technically gets a legal chance to cross here. It almost seems fitting that the Match charter school is on the other side of this intersection as the students there get a lesson about Boston intersections everyday. I hope they get extra credit.
 
It's been pointed out many times before - I think the primary reason people jaywalk here is because the walk/don't walk signs can't be trusted. I don't always feel safe crossing on a 'walk' and going into turning traffic, and on many occassions I can very safely cross on a 'don't walk' without even worrying about turning traffic. As the article mentions, all you ever see are don't walk signs - the walk cycle is rare. How much trouble could it possibly be to reprogram these?
 
Being in cities where the walk sign is synced with the parallel green light is pretty much heaven.
 
I very rarely pay any attention to the walk signal. Crossing the street isn't exactly rocket science. If you take a second to look down the street you can pretty quickly determine whether or not it is safe to cross.

Most of the near misses I see are idiots who wander into intersection while cars are still trying to pass through and then yell at the driver that they had a walk light.

But as they say, common sense ain't that common.
 
Even if the buttons worked, I wouldn't want to touch them.
 
I'm always shocked when I see people actually waiting. I guess places like Boston and NYC are anomalies when it comes to waiting for traffic.
 
^^ I think that's partially b/c drivers in these cities don't fuck around.
 
My biggest problem is that there is no standard. Some countdowns count to the lasts second to cross, others count down to the last second to START to cross.

I dont get why traffic engineers dont understand how this system makes everything fail.

If one yellow light lasted 2 seconds, and the next 5 yellows last 40 seconds, and then the next one lasts 3, guess what happens? Nobody pays attention to the yellow anymore and the whole system is ruined.

Pedestrian buttons should ONLY be used when the entire traffic light is "asleep". Where I am in california, after 11pm, 90% of traffic lights turn red all the time (red in all directions). Cars ONLY get a green when they stop and the pavement sensor picks it up. Pedestrians only get to walk when they push the button.
 
I like Statler's point of view.

Traffic planning is ridiculously complicated, and takes all sorts of computer modeling to truly understand (from what I hear). Too bad more intersections can't be optimized for pedestrians, but I actually think we've had discussion before about how Boston should start using some kind of "smart" traffic system. Don't know what that was all about though.
 
I never paid any attention to walk buttons. I never understood why Boston never grasped the concept that walk signs are synched with the green light. In downtown Montr?al, for example, most intersections don't even HAVE pedestrian lights. You just follow the same rules as the traffic - red: stop, green: go, yellow: hurry the eff up because there is no time lapse between one direction's red and the other's green and MTL drivers don't screw around.

That kind of system always just made sense to me. No buttons to press, no waiting, wondering if your turn in the cycle has come and gone. Just wait for the green light like the traffic you're paralleling.

Since moving away from Boston I've become much more keenly aware of jaywalking. I still do it from time-to-time, but not with the same regularity and intent as I did when I lived in the city.
 
The Montreal system works because you can't turn right on red there.
 
One small problem: if the street is one-way, you may have to turn 180-degrees to see whether you have the green light.
 
One small problem: if the street is one-way, you may have to turn 180-degrees to see whether you have the green light.

They have the problem in Boston too!

See comm ave and the fenway bridge
 
Comm Ave is not designed properly for pedestrians to walk down its length. There should be proper crossings for the walkway in the middle of the Mall.
 
Unless you are in a wheelchair, the mid-Mall crossings seem fine to me.
 
One small problem: if the street is one-way, you may have to turn 180-degrees to see whether you have the green light.

Not in Montreal. They have traffic lights facing pedestrian traffic, regardless of direction of automobile traffic. They are also only about six feet (or two meters, I suppose) above the ground.
 
One small problem: if the street is one-way, you may have to turn 180-degrees to see whether you have the green light.

Sorry, I was trying to keep my post shorter.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ogilvy's_(Montréal)_2006-01-27.JPG

As mentioned, the street lights effectively replace walk signals. If you look at this photo of Ste-Catherine St in Montreal, the stop light facing to the right is faced against the traffic flow and its sole purpose is for use by pedestrians. I suppose it probably would be cheaper for them to switch them out for traditional walk signals, but it's one of the things that makes Montreal unique.
 
A new pedestrian plaza has been born!

Well, almost a month ago, but I dont think anyone posted it.


Except it was actually always a sidewalk, bot now cars cant park there!

-----
Map:
http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&sou...362611,-71.0564&spn=0.001104,0.00302&t=k&z=19


The City of Boston is piloting a new program to restrict vehicular access along Cross Street from Hanover to Salem Street. Under this program vehicles will no longer have access to the center sidewalk area. This will greatly enhance the pedestrian experience for the hundreds of residents and tourists who use this sidewalk daily and presently have to navigate through parked cars and moving traffic.

Since the completion of the Central Artery Project, this sidewalk has been cordoned off by bollards which created a zone in the middle of the sidewalk for general parking, deliveries and overnight resident parking. Under this plan the city will be closing the vehicular entrances to this area.

The Boston Transportation Department, working with Boston City Councillor Sal LaMattina and State Representative Aaron Michlewitz, presented a number of alternatives for improvements at two public meetings held recently in the North End. The pilot that is being implemented gained the overall support of the community members in attendance.

?The creation of a pedestrian plaza along this corridor will enable visitors and residents to more fully enjoy the charm of the historic North End and the Freedom Trail?, stated Mayor Thomas M. Menino. ?These improvements will also allow local business to attract more customers and expand outdoor opportunities.?

Boston District One City Councillor Sal LaMattina stated his support of the plaza by adding, ?The North End and Cross Street in particular has seen increased pedestrian traffic this pedestrian plaza will enable increased safety and the potential for additional outdoor activities.? State Representative Aaron Michlewitz endorsed the project by stating, ?The situation on Cross Street has been a major public safety issue. The creation of a pedestrian plaza will allow for a safer and friendlier environment for residents and visitors alike.?

The Boston Transportation Department will monitor the impacts and success of these enhancements and will strictly enforce the regulations governing the use of the pedestrian area along Cross Street.

http://www.cityofboston.gov/news/default.aspx?id=4707
 
It would be a lot more charming if they built some infill over the expressway offramps. That would really define the area.
 
I would love to see this become a strip of restaurants with largish outdoor seating areas.
 

Back
Top