I have a whole bunch of these old shots of the city that I've pulled off the Bostonian Society website, mostly photos of old buildings I like. When I get restless, I pick one or two of the ones I saved and shoot their replacements.
This is the corner of Washington and Essex. Boylston is renamed Essex when it moves east of Washington.
I don't hate wonderful buildings. I hate it when interesting buildings are superceded by less interesting ones, as is the case in my previous post. Would you call the old one on the corner of Washington and Essex an example of Ruskinesque Gothic? It certainly went well with its surviving near neighbor on Essex (now threatened) pictured below.
In any event, the later building at 600 Washington is pleasant enough, but it isn't as nice as the buildings it replaced. It is an object lesson about what we can expect at Shreve Crump and Low...something that will probably be pleasant enough in the end, but not as varied and interesting as that which went before.
Rather than being overtly didactic about my opinion, I have posted before and after photos. Since you draw me out, my theory is this: Boston reached its architectural peak before WW1, and almost everything that has followed has been devolutionary. There are exceptions (e.g. 45 Province, although I don't vouch for what preceded the ugly old garage there), but as a rule it seems that most teardowns or fire casualties have been followed by inferior replacements. Reactionary stuff, eh?
I am not going all Prince Charles on you. I love skyscrapers and modern architecture. I actually like City Hall and Hurley too, just not at the price that was paid make room for them. I like the waterfront stuff (except the Harbor Towers extermination of India Wharf), especially as its antecedents were falling into the harbor.
I also wonder if a modern liberal democracy is capable of great architecture. I am not saying it is incapable of it, so I am not going Albert Speer on you either. I throw it out there for your views: have illiberal democracies and monarchies done a better job of it?
Anyway, I think that development ought to be focused on filling the gaps, and removing the crap, fixing the old teardown mistakes. Hello Turnpike air rights (hello Ned!), Sawyer parking lots, Congress St. garage, empty N. Station lots, Gateway Center, City Hall Plaza.
So what I hate about Boston is we tear down the wrong stuff, and don't put up worthy replacements. Don't believe me yet? See below for the first half of the before and after I'll be posting in 3 years.