Oh, you were thinking of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. I agree that this is a good example of taking certain kinds of property rights in order to give more freedom to other people, and that it was the right thing to do. But it's not the same as zoning. Quite the opposite, really.
The question being investigated is: do municipalities intentionally, but covertly, undermine the Civil Rights Act of 1964 through the creation of certain zoning regulations? Or is the existence of significant remaining segregation due to something else?
I don't know the answer to this, and it seems like a very difficult matter to sort out, but I do appreciate the work so far.
The question being investigated is: do municipalities intentionally, but covertly, undermine the Civil Rights Act of 1964 through the creation of certain zoning regulations? Or is the existence of significant remaining segregation due to something else?
I don't know the answer to this, and it seems like a very difficult matter to sort out, but I do appreciate the work so far.