Ah, alternative facts.
Pepsi & Coke are not owned by the same company.
If by group he means mutual fund owning humans, then he is technically correct.
Ah, alternative facts.
Pepsi & Coke are not owned by the same company.
Has anyone else heard the plan to close off access from Charles River Road in Watertown from the Watertown Square intersection? I just heard of this tonight.
Check out slide 24 here. They would make the western end of it one-way eastbound, fed by Riverside Street. The part of the road between Riverside Street and Watertown Square would be turned into parkland. Westbound traffic would be forced to turn right onto Wheeler Ln, I believe.
http://www.massdot.state.ma.us/Portals/17/docs/ArsenalStreet/MtngPres_3217.PDF
Here's the project site:
http://www.massdot.state.ma.us/plan...ies/ArsenalStreetCorridorStudy/Documents.aspx
On my drive to Hartford this morning the 128/I-95 interchange was all screwed up. They have moved traffic to the new exit ramp (just west of the existing). Gotta hand it to MassDOT and the contractors, didn't waste anytime with getting that thing up and running
Is this praise or warning?
Lawmakers included in the new state budget a provision to have the Department of Transportation establish a working group to “identify and evaluate the economic and cultural benefits and political, legal or logistical challenges to the Berkshire and western Massachusetts regions” of seasonal weekend train service between Pittsfield and New York City.
Such a service would be modeled on the seasonal weekend CapeFlyer service, which shuttles passengers between Boston and Barnstable during summer weekends. The working group would be required to contact New York officials in an effort to collaborate, and to submit a report to the Legislature by next March.
....Reconnecting scenic western Massachusetts to the nation’s largest city is not a new idea, even in recent years. In 2010, the Housatonic Railroad Company, which operates freight service through Connecticut and the Berkshires, optimistically projected about 2 million annual fares if daily, year-round service resumed.
The Berkshire Regional Planning Commission also studied the idea earlier this decade, getting to the point of identifying potential station locations. And in early 2015, the state finalized the purchase of nearly 40 miles of rail between Pittsfield and the state’s southwestern border, seen as a potential precursor to establishing new passenger service to New York through Connecticut.
But in the time since, Hinds said, Connecticut’s government has been mostly uninterested in helping establish a north-south route. Hinds thinks Massachusetts and New York could work together to establish a different route that bypasses Connecticut, instead heading west toward Albany before cutting south to the city. The legislation would not require MassDOT to consider this route exclusively.
Massachusetts pays 56% of State & Local road spending from user fees, meaning that 44% comes from things like property tax (and implying that "fair" transportation spending would be of a kind that placed about equal weight on maximizing property values (mobility per $ or per sq ft) rather than which maximized SOV movement).
Interesting graphic, but of that 44%, how much comes from people who drive for all of their travel? In those cases, investing in SOV flow and investing in property values would be largely the same.
You seem to be treating all real estate as if it were a suburban owner-occupied house. In the core, the taxpayer is not "the homeowner."
If you want to picture a "who" that pays, you still endup with either an inanimate building or, its owner, which is likely to be a REIT or non-residentt, or an employer trying to maximize access to the talent pool/labor market. In that core (essentially where MBTA "double-digit" buses run), what's demanded is pure "access" and pure "mobility" and does not begin with "I already own this car..."