Winthrop Center | 115 Winthrop Square | Financial District

The lead time on that kind of custom stone is insane. They’ll either wrap the column in a cheapo aluminum plate or stainless steel cylinder and call it a day or they’ll leave it nude for a few months while the stone is fabricated again.
 
chrisbrat said:
Still really odd to me that Millenium, the folks paying a fortune to live in MT, and the city of Boston are all fine with that absurd, unfinished roof.
Click to expand...
As someone who gets to stay at MT twice a year, I can tell you none of the residents (and me) care. Let's just say, the roof impacts exactly 0% of their lives. They care more about the fact that management is no longer providing cups for their complimentary morning coffee in the lounge than they do the roof.
 
KentXie said:
As someone who gets to stay at MT twice a year, I can tell you none of the residents (and me) care. Let's just say, the roof impacts exactly 0% of their lives. They care more about the fact that management is no longer providing cups for their complimentary morning coffee in the lounge than they do the roof.
Click to expand...
Sure. Opinions differ. I’ve stayed at MT a few times and both I and my friends who live there fucking hate that the roof is incomplete and looks ridiculous from the South.
 
From the project site
vision.jpg

https://winthropcenter.com/
 
chrisbrat said:
Sure. Opinions differ. I’ve stayed at MT a few times and both I and my friends who live there fucking hate that the roof is incomplete and looks ridiculous from the South.
Click to expand...

Something something bias.

You're a dude that hangs out on a niche architecture forum, of course it bothers you.
 
393b40 said:
Something something bias.

You're a dude that hangs out on a niche architecture forum, of course it bothers you.
Click to expand...
I don't really follow your point. You're a dude who hangs out here and it apparently doesn't bother you. So, back to my original point: opinions differ.

My take: the unfinished roof looks cheap and shitty.

You (and plenty others): it looks fine.

Fair enough.
 
Last edited:
chrisbrat said:
I don't really follow your point. You're a dude who hangs out here and it apparently doesn't bother you. So, back to my original point: opinions differ.

My take: the unfinished roof looks cheap and shitty.

You (and plenty others): it looks fine.

Fair enough.
Click to expand...

It does look shitty. But absolutely no one who's not already on this board has ever thought about it, or maybe even noticed it. I'm guessing that's what he means.
 
Why don't we all agree both towers are unremarkable in massing and style, promised far more by way of building amenities/local improvements than was produced, and Boston will likely tap MP for another one due to our fine city's deep, deep-seated love of design that doesn't spook the horses?
 
urbanmansprawler said:
Why don't we all agree both towers are unremarkable in massing and style, promised far more by way of building amenities/local improvements than was produced, and Boston will likely tap MP for another one due to our fine city's deep, deep-seated love of design that doesn't spook the horses?
Click to expand...
Because I think both towers are remarkable and an awesome addition to the city. There’s no point continuing to argue over matters of taste.
 
urbanmansprawler said:
Boston will likely tap MP for another one
Click to expand...

I have questions:

1.) How do you define "Boston"--the Mayor Wu regime? A potential successor regime? The BPDA as presently constituted? The BPDA as it might be evolving?

2.) How do you define "tap"? Remember, the process in which they won the development sweepstakes for the Winthrop Sq. Garage parcel was intensely fought (5 other competing bids), very drawn-out, bitterly politicized, very dramatic, etc. Mayor Wu fought against it, notably, as a Councilor. Hundreds of opponents and proponents attended a City Council hearing on it. It required a change to preexisting zoning regulations, via a successful home-rule petition.

Do you have a City-owned parcel in mind in some neighborhood that seems as ripe for a similar development sweepstakes as which transpired with the Winthrop Sq. garage?
 
BronsonShore said:
It does look shitty. But absolutely no one who's not already on this board has ever thought about it, or maybe even noticed it. I'm guessing that's what he means.
Click to expand...

Just an anecdote, but. my wife who most certainly is not on this board (or cares in the least) routinely remarks on how ugly it looks when we drive downtown from Dot on 93.
 
Has anyone noticed that at night, the lighting on the "skinny" sides of the building is much more faint and less bright than on the fatter sides? Also, I think it's more noticeable because the skinny sides only have 2 slats that are lit up, whereas the wider sides have 8-10 slats. I guess this is a boring observation, but has anyone else noticed that?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top