Yeah, I don't think the plaza has an official name. The landmark commission's report really thoroughly describes everything about that building and the plaza, and they only ever call it "the plaza." So if there's no official name, I guess the "BCBS plaza"? Or "Milton Place" sounds nice.
Winthrop Center | 115 Winthrop Square | Financial District
- Thread starter vanshnookenraggen
- Start date
The 133 Fed. plaza keeps some excellent company in that regard. Here's the BPDA's official map for Downtown. Here are some plazas it names: City Hall Plaza.
Here are some parks/plazas it doesn't name, MERELY IN DTX:
133 Fed. Plaza;
125 Summer Plaza;
1 Lincoln Plaza;
175 Fed. Plaza;
100 Summer Plaza;
Summer Street Plaza (between Macy's/Primark)
1 Franklin St. Plaza (used to known as "Shopper's Park," which does make it onto Google Maps)
28 State St. Plaza
Irish Famine Memorial Plaza
Old State House Plaza (i.e., Boston Massacre Site)
Old City Hall Plaza
Winthrop Square Park
that's 1 named, 12 not. What does a guy have to do around here to get a plaza labeled on a map?!?
(NOTE: For those who may claim, "oh, I'm sure many of those are labelled on the Google Maps version of Downtown".... good luck with that.)
2016:
2024:
See pic in previous post
It began on the drawing board as some great civic space/people connector - - - In the end, they chopped it down to a hotel lobby complete with bollards (errr.....I mean furniture obstacles to crowd out people and movement)
Typical Boston: Home of the Bunt.
.
Last edited:
If you remove the "90's shopping mall" steel arches, then fill the place with furniture and take a picture without people around, it's pretty close to that original proposal. The crowds themselves with depend a lot on the day, time, and weather, but should improve somewhat once the park is open.
When I snapped the pic that prompted Shmessy's response-post, High Street Place Food Hall (literally across the street) was hoppin. "The Connector: Where Boston Comes Together" sucks.
Will is "suck less" eventually? Maybe. Is it -- or will it ever be -- even vaguely like what was promised by Millenium? Nope.
Will is "suck less" eventually? Maybe. Is it -- or will it ever be -- even vaguely like what was promised by Millenium? Nope.
themissinglink
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2018
- Messages
- 1,998
- Reaction score
- 5,512
Winthrop Center promised a public space open seven days a week. The city is trying to hold them to it. - The Boston Globe
The BPDA gave developer Millennium Partners a slap on the wrist this week, claiming that its three-story-high lobby, dubbed The Connector, was locked on weekends when it's supposed to be open seven days a week.
www.bostonglobe.com
That's the point, DZ. The unrendered "fill the place with furniture" actually happened and it extinguished the civic dynamic of the "Great Hall". That existing hall now can hold far fewer humanoids with all that clutter - - and that is EXACTLY the point of management now.
They purposely threw obstacles in the way to DE-POPULATE that original render of the hall to make it far less dynamic and inviting for people to cut through. They sold it as one thing and then they proactively crumpled up the idea of it being a helpful pass-through for pedestrians and civic hall. They purposely turned it into a hotel lobby/salon. Because, God Forbid, Boston ever becomes a dynamic and lively city.
Last edited:
Someone should throw half the obstacle furniture/gatekeeper desks out on the street and open that hall up to somewhat close to what was promised for pedestrians. That "Connector" is clogged like a 350 pound old person's aorta.
Randy N. Craven-Krawtch
New member
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2024
- Messages
- 46
- Reaction score
- 91
Looks like a fun place to hang around on a Sunday afternoon! 
Johnnyrocket891
Active Member
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2019
- Messages
- 245
- Reaction score
- 149
The public space on the ground-floor pictures looks amazing. The problem here is basic retail stores are done.
The old model doesn't work.
Winthrop Center is a lost vision.
The amount of overhead it costs to run a brick & mortar retail store vs running an online retail platform on the internet is the issue.
At this point there alot of risk for even Food chains to grind out for such low margins.
Until a reset in our economy that can reset the actual asset prices and create a stable currency I believe the current situation for Mass especially the surrounding areas in Boston will continue to decline and consolidate
The old model doesn't work.Winthrop Center is a lost vision.
The amount of overhead it costs to run a brick & mortar retail store vs running an online retail platform on the internet is the issue.
At this point there alot of risk for even Food chains to grind out for such low margins.
Until a reset in our economy that can reset the actual asset prices and create a stable currency I believe the current situation for Mass especially the surrounding areas in Boston will continue to decline and consolidate
citydweller
Active Member
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2019
- Messages
- 479
- Reaction score
- 752
Pre-pandemic, this was just fanciful marketing hype. Post-pandemic, it's dead on arrival. There are major malls going out of business now. We don't congregate like years ago. I've been working remote for 3+ years, never to return to the office and the insane daily drive to the city.
I agree with most of that, but if the model is entirely dead then how come so many “markets” are doing just fine in Boston and elsewhere? As per my earlier reply in this post, at precisely the time I took the picture that served as catalyst for this round of the conversation, High Street Place Food Hall (literally across the street) was VERY busy. How do you explain that with *only* points you put forth? Millenium promised something they didn’t deliver - but something other developers (who WANT to do so) clearly can do successfully.
bigpicture7
Senior Member
- Joined
- May 5, 2016
- Messages
- 4,043
- Reaction score
- 10,368
Completely disagree. What you are describing is a completely dead society, and most people don't want that.
citydweller
Active Member
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2019
- Messages
- 479
- Reaction score
- 752
It's clear that Millennium didn't deliver on what was "promised" in its proposal but let's be real here ... open 18 hours a day as a "great hall", huh? What we have is a beautiful lobby for the locals to grab a sandwich and coffee at lunch time but nothing more.
Last edited:
Exactly, Citydweller, it LITERALLY was called "The Connector". For a reason. It's main selling point was to aid pedestrians in being a cut-through (and a nice indoor respite if a hot day or rain or snow).
They subsequently threw up mini fortresses and barriers (just look at that recent pic above).
Their action in doing so (none of that was in the renders) can only be described a "DISCONNECTOR".
Last edited:
citydweller
Active Member
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2019
- Messages
- 479
- Reaction score
- 752
Maybe so, but how many times do you order from amazon instead of patronizing your local businesses? That's the society we live in. Next, amazon will be using drones to deliver packages to our doorstep.
Justbuildit
Senior Member
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2022
- Messages
- 1,063
- Reaction score
- 3,709
Ironic username aside, as a citydweller myself, I very frequently patronize my local businesses, whether they're a small wine shop or local CVS. Amazon is of course also in play, but density and urban agglomeration has value in itself. Back to the question at hand, the corporate lobby is definitely a downgrade from the renderings, but it has a few restaurants that will serve the 30 floors of offices and another 30 floors of residences. If they actually do remain open during the required hours, it'll be another small public space that won't be lifechanging. Certainly this could be better, but I don't think an emptyish corporate lobby spells the end of American urban society.
found5dollar
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2007
- Messages
- 1,153
- Reaction score
- 411
Are you arguing that putting out free public seating makes a space *less* usable by the public?
bigpicture7
Senior Member
- Joined
- May 5, 2016
- Messages
- 4,043
- Reaction score
- 10,368
I'm in agreement that society has gone through / is going through major changes, but I also believe we're not in the final chapter; things will continue to evolve based both on convenience as well as what people value. I agree with you that we're not going back to 1995. But I am honestly excited what may be possible for 2035, because I think things will settle out on some yet-to-be-seen state (I certainly don't want 1995, with big shopping malls with crammed parking lots and lots of waste).
To answer your question about my own tendencies: it hasn't been a linear trajectory. I certainly do online shopping like most people, but in seriousness, I patronize Amazon significantly less today than a few years ago. 2018 - 2021 was peak Amazon for me personally. As the pandemic receded, I (based on preference more than any sort of activism) substantially increased my engagement with local businesses. Frankly, I missed it. Including sitting at a neighborhood breakfast counter a day or two per week with my work and my mug of coffee. I actually do that more in 2024 than I was doing in 2018-2019. Like you, I love the flexibility that new ways of working have brought; it's just that for me and a lot of people, it hasn't meant totally withdrawing. If Boston's housing costs weren't completely insane, you'd see people living closer and hanging out more (I don't hold it against you in the least that a lousy commute precludes that. At the same time, I'd love to see commutes be way better in 2035 based on both transit improvements and housing availability. A guy can dream).