Fortpointer, thanks for joining the conversation on this website. I've also been following this closely but would be interested in your take on what you mean by "promised" versus generally disclosed in a filing. Are the previous claims enforceable by BPDA or under contract law? Should they be? Clearly the operating hours issue was in an enforceable contract and the BPDA letter clearly did enough to get the hall open.
To be more succinct, what could be done, in your opinion, to avoid this from happening in the future?
I'd also withhold judgment on the success of the development until known tenants move in and the park is open. But yes, currently not up to expectations.