Non MBTA buses, School buses, and electrification

Not quite sure where to put this, but Woburn, Burlington, Reading, and Wakefield have started a new free microtransit service operated by Circuit. The service operates in 2 seperate zones, Woburn/Burlington, and Reading/Wakefield, with travel provided within each zone but not between them. Service is also provided from both zones to Lahey Clinic in Burlington and Winchester Hospital. https://www.ridecircuit.com/the-link, https://woburnma.gov/the-link-faq/1788283999904.pngr/woburn - Introducing the Link
 
Not quite sure where to put this, but Woburn, Burlington, Reading, and Wakefield have started a new free microtransit service operated by Circuit. The service operates in 2 seperate zones, Woburn/Burlington, and Reading/Wakefield, with travel provided within each zone but not between them. Service is also provided from both zones to Lahey Clinic in Burlington and Winchester Hospital. https://www.ridecircuit.com/the-link, https://woburnma.gov/the-link-faq/View attachment 75349r/woburn - Introducing the Link
Soo... How many local non-RTA transit agencies overlapping the T bus service area does this make? Beverly Local Bus is recently RIP, but Lexington's Lexpress, Bedford Local Transit, Salem Skipper, Stoneham Shuttle (also op. by Circuit) as far as I know are all still going? I have to assume that a lot of this is funded via one-time microtransit grant funding, but I'm pretty sure Lexpress has been around for decades. it's still kinda damning that if there's enough transit demand in the outer MBTA district to sustain these services and the T isn't providing it. I know the T's structure isn't currently set up for it, but maybe the T should be figuring out if it can operate more suburban service. Use the Ride's minibus fleet and operators if you can square it with the unions, or use whatever mechanism they use for the 714/716 contract operated service.
 
off the top of my head:
- rclink
- mission hill link

tmas:
- alewife tma
- watertown tma
- lower mystic tma
- neponset valley tma
- charles river tma
- seaport tma (ferry)
- middlesex 3 tma
- 128 business council
- boynton-union connect

acton/boxborough/concord have the crosstown connect tma, but not exactly in mbta bus territory
longwood collective is generally not open to the public

tmas probably have a place, if employers really do want to run their own buses, but lower mystic tma for example feels less necessary
 
off the top of my head:
- rclink
- mission hill link

tmas:
- alewife tma
- watertown tma
- lower mystic tma
- neponset valley tma
- charles river tma
- seaport tma (ferry)
- middlesex 3 tma
- 128 business council
- boynton-union connect

acton/boxborough/concord have the crosstown connect tma, but not exactly in mbta bus territory
longwood collective is generally not open to the public

tmas probably have a place, if employers really do want to run their own buses, but lower mystic tma for example feels less necessary
I can't find the RFP right now, but MassDOT is looking at employing an external consultant to review the effectiveness of the TMA grant program.
 
There badly needs to be some consolidation or coordination of these TMAs. I didn't even know half of them existed because they don't appear on MBTA maps and they don't have GTFS (so they don't appear as options on Google Maps etc). At the very least, there needs to be a standard requirement that any publicly-open services have standardized maps (to be displayed at stations) and GTFS.

Some of them would be strong candidates to be taken over by the MBTA, either directly-operated (when sufficient garage space, buses, and operators are available) or as contracted routes. EZRide (Charles River TMA) and the Seaport Ferry in particular. The Watertown shuttles point to a need for a Harvard-Waltham route via Western, Arsenal, and Pleasant (Pleasant is going to lose its current very-limited MBTA service under BNR). The Boynton Yards shuttle directly parallels the 85. The Lower Mystic Link will mostly parallel the Silver Line extension to Sullivan.

There definitely are certain areas that don't quite have the demand for normal 40-foot buses, but where some kind of standardized T-branded shuttle system would be better than the current mismash. Cambridge Discovery Park/Acorn Park (which has something like 3 different TMA shuttles), Cambridge Highlands, Mission Hill, Medford Street in Charlestown, etc. Those would also be useful for a few current MBTA situations (like the 411 loop to Jack Satter House) where the need for a relatively small volume of one-seat rides for seniors between housing and groceries/medical ends up diverting bus routes onto less-efficient corridors.
 
off the top of my head:
- rclink
- mission hill link

tmas:
- alewife tma
- watertown tma
- lower mystic tma
- neponset valley tma
- charles river tma
- seaport tma (ferry)
- middlesex 3 tma
- 128 business council
- boynton-union connect

acton/boxborough/concord have the crosstown connect tma, but not exactly in mbta bus territory
longwood collective is generally not open to the public

tmas probably have a place, if employers really do want to run their own buses, but lower mystic tma for example feels less necessary
There used to be a privately run bus shuttle running from Waverly westerly on Trapelo Road which provided access to McLean Hospital and points west. I used to use it when I worked at the Army Corps office that was on Trapelo Rd in Waltham.
 
You know, the Alewife one seems to be mainly just south of the Fitchburg Line tracks....
 
There used to be a privately run bus shuttle running from Waverly westerly on Trapelo Road which provided access to McLean Hospital and points west. I used to use it when I worked at the Army Corps office that was on Trapelo Rd in Waltham.
That was Metropolitan Coach, which ran that route until 1979. It was one of the last privately-operated local buses (versus express commuter/intercity runs) in the MBTA area.
 

Mildly interesting (since 128bc was mentioned), but they did a survey and 22% of N1 Riders and 38% of W1 Riders said they def had access to car; yet still chose to commute using 128bc. Destination is pretty much office park suburbia...

Have to say I would have taken the under big time.

(Also, MBTA Busses do not serve either route)
 
The MBTA seemed to have tried to make a consolidated minibus network before the Suburban Transit Program and TMA's
1788432011304.png
 

Back
Top