Quabbin & MWRA Water & Sewer

I think that’s part of the WASM rehabilitation they’re doing during the next few winters.
You nailed it. Had to Google the acronym, and found this Weston Aquaduct Supply Main rehab project in Arlington Somerville Medford.

this work is “Where green meets purple” center-right in the map below (just east of Boston Ave)

figure2.jpg


Weston Aqueduct Supply Main Rehabilitation - Medford, Somerville, Arlington (Contract 6544)
 
Last edited:
The diagram above inspires the question: in a networked web of mains, how do they "meter at the City Gate?"
Background: MWRA presents a water bill to each municipality, say, Medford. Medford pays "one big bill" for all the water that is delivered "to the city gate", including:
  • Metered at residential consumption
  • Metered delivery to other private buildings
  • Unmetered losses (leaks) under the streets
  • Unmetered use in parks, medians, and public buildings
(Medford then bills local residents for water use that contains a little bit of socialism...each metered bill has to charge a slightly higher per-gallon rate in order to cover the city's citywide bill, including municipal uses and municipal leakage)

Does this mean that there is a "Municipal Meter" at each point at which the city draws water out of the Supply Mains and into the "local" pipes?
 
Why on earth do you think water use in public buildings and parks is unmetered? Even a single water spigot in a median has one of those little remote meter reading things attached to it.
 
I would tend to assume that municipal buildings and the like are individually metered, with a bit of "pocket A to pocket B" going on where the individual water/sewer assessments is paid out of the individual operating budgets of each department. There probably is some accounting for leakages, meter malfunctions and water theft though.
 
Why on earth do you think water use in public buildings and parks is unmetered? Even a single water spigot in a median has one of those little remote meter reading things attached to it.
Could, sure, but do they? Do cities know that all unmetered usage is pure pipe leak?
My understanding is that old “sprinkler park” and fountains were unmetered
 
Per the Boston Water and Sewer Commission, the City of Boston purchases the water in its network from the MWRA wholesale water network via 29 metered connections to the five Boston distribution networks. So yes, MWRA water is metered (and billed for) at the city network entry points.
 
Watch your mail: the MWRA has sent out its annual water report(s). If you're in a town served by the MWRA, they send out a general brochure report with a "your town" insert data.
They report on systemwide infrastructure, and then the test results for your town (things like lead, coliform, particulates, etc. as tested at taps in your town)

PDF online: https://www.mwra.com/water/html/awqr.htm

Then the town-by-town test results It is also on their website:
 
The City of Waltham got notified recently that the MWRA will be installing 9,000 Feet of 36" pipe down Lexington Street from the Lexington Line (Old Friendly's) to Totten Pond Road. Work is expected to be done in 2 phases under 2 separate construction contracts. This first contract is expected to start construction in the Spring of 2022 This new connection will be critical to supplying water to the city when the WASM 3 line is shutdown for rehabilitation starting in 2025.
 
Is there anywhere to see a regional map of ongoing sewer separation projects? I was curious after the recent releases from storms. This information in general seems extremely scattered and even just the Boston map of projects (the only current-ish one i could find) seems outdated.
 
So, I've been loving the COVID tracking that the MWRA has been publishing based on RNA fragments per mL of wastewater going to Deer Island from the Northside and Southside of Boston

The CDC now as a parallel national tracker system

Why doesn't the CDC tracker include Boston North and Boston South?
 
Very long profile. of Biobot's [Cambridge MA] analyses of sewage.


It's all the rage.



As to why CDC hasn't yet incorporated Deer Island, I think its possibly due to CDC starting first with those facilities where Federal monies for the collection and analysis may be involved, and then expanding the number of locations as the surveillance system becomes more robust.
 

A group of Quabbin watershed towns are pushing for legislation to create a trust fund financed by MWRA communities to pay towns that border the Quabbin. It’s a creative financing solution that seems duplicative, since the state already compensates these communities. But the effort points to a real need: many communities in Massachusetts lack a reliable water source.

[...]

Before Massachusetts’ water problems worsen, the state’s Water Resources Commission should embark on the creation of a statewide water plan. Planning could explore what it would take to provide every region with reliable water and could be used to prioritize where the state spends its money. A big part of this would probably be looking at which communities should be supported to join the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, which is the state’s most reliable water source.

[...]

As other regions struggle to reliably access water, the MWRA conducted four expansion studies over the past few years, examining what it would take to provide water to communities in the MetroWest area, the Ipswich River basin, the South Shore, and, most recently, the Quabbin Reservoir watershed communities.

There are myriad reasons why these communities could use the water. Some Quabbin communities lack any municipal water. The Ipswich River Basin is considered “stressed,” meaning there’s not enough water to meet the demand, so towns often face water restrictions, like limiting lawn irrigation. The South Shore faces similar supply issues. Communities have had water contaminated by PFAS, chemicals that can cause health risks, then they must spend money treating the water.

A lack of water constrains development. Weymouth, for example, considered joining the MWRA as part of a plan to redevelop the former South Weymouth Naval Air Station, since Weymouth’s current water sources can’t meet the demand for an envisioned 4,000 new units and 10 million square feet of commercial space.

But the MWRA doesn’t have capacity to do all these expansions, and the cost of expanding could be prohibitive, particularly for smaller communities. For example, the Quabbin area study found that the cost of bringing Quabbin water to New Salem and three other towns would have cost $215.4 million in 2024, while finding a new groundwater source to serve New Salem and its neighbors would cost $112.4 million. Expanding water to the South Shore could cost up to $1.25 billion (in 2022 dollars) to cover 10 communities. Projects in the Ipswich River Basin and MetroWest could cost anywhere from $110 million to $1.1 billion, depending on how many communities are served.
 
Could we drink the water that's treated at Deer Island? Or does it need further treatment to be safe for us? Seems like a waste of resources to just pipe it out into the harbor after we treat it.
 
Could we drink the water that's treated at Deer Island? Or does it need further treatment to be safe for us? Seems like a waste of resources to just pipe it out into the harbor after we treat it.
(Based on very limited knowledge/research so take this with a grain of salt but) No, Deer Island doesn't do remotely enough treatment for the water to be drinkable. It may be possible for it to be used for industrial or agricultural purposes but again I don't know.

That being said, that kind of capability (along with grey/black water separation) is absolutely worth investing in for the water-scarce future ahead.
 
(Based on very limited knowledge/research so take this with a grain of salt but) No, Deer Island doesn't do remotely enough treatment for the water to be drinkable. It may be possible for it to be used for industrial or agricultural purposes but again I don't know.

That being said, that kind of capability (along with grey/black water separation) is absolutely worth investing in for the water-scarce future ahead.
Technologically it's feasible - but yea you would absolutely need to treat the water coming out of deer island again. Its actually not uncommon in places like CA and TX, but my understanding is that it's more common for it to be indirect, being sent to an water source that is later drawn from for drinking water, than wastewater being directly piped to the drinking water plant. When that does happen, I believe it's when both treatment of potable water and sewerage are local responsiblities - in MWRAs case, you'd probably have to tunnel all the way from Deer Island back to Marlborough, and pump it all back.

As an aside... a lot of places have drinking water that is de-facto reused, even if not formally classified as such... apparently an average of 50% of Houston's drinking water is technically Dallas's waste water, since Dallas discharges into the Trinity River that then feeds Houston's Lake Livingston Reservoir. A lot of riverine communities draw water from, and discharge wastewater into rivers, so a lot of port cities are at the end of the chain. New Orleans, Philly, DC... not many places have the protected watersheds of New England/New York. I believe especially with the recent prominence of PFAS forever chemicals in water supplies, that its become a subject of some considerable research interest.

It's worth investigating for MWRA but arguably not at the risk of contaminating our otherwise clean water supplies - unlike a lot of western communities, even in recent major droughts, my understanding is the Quabbin hasn't been majorly stressed to supply the region, staying in what DCR claims is a normal 80% range, and I believe we're using like ⅔ of the amount we were in 1990.
 
Last edited:
There’s no reason to consider recycling grey water or desalination in the MWRA water district. We are so fortunate in this region to have a climate where we get consistent average rainfall throughout each month of the year. As noted above, the Quabbin has sufficient capacity to handle more demand and more water was demanded in the past than current usage and the reservoir was fine. Besides, we don’t want to ruin what could be the best tasting large district tap water supply in the country. Whenever you go to another region in this country where they recycle their water or clean it for potable purposes from a downstream discharge source, it’s immediately noticeable the difference in taste and quality when you’re used to drinking the MWRA tap water. The MWRA water setup is one of the most underrated attributes for the areas it serves.
 
There’s no reason to consider recycling grey water or desalination in the MWRA water district. We are so fortunate in this region to have a climate where we get consistent average rainfall throughout each month of the year. As noted above, the Quabbin has sufficient capacity to handle more demand and more water was demanded in the past than current usage and the reservoir was fine. Besides, we don’t want to ruin what could be the best tasting large district tap water supply in the country. Whenever you go to another region in this country where they recycle their water or clean it for potable purposes from a downstream discharge source, it’s immediately noticeable the difference in taste and quality when you’re used to drinking the MWRA tap water. The MWRA water setup is one of the most underrated attributes for the areas it serves.
Don't have to go far, just taste the difference between Cambridge water and pretty much everywhere else in MA with MWRA.

Cambridge water sucks and is this weird pride point for the townies and politicians there.
 
Cambridge water has so much salt from the 128 runoff. Coffee baristas hate what it does to the machines.

I really do wonder what compromat someone has on the city that keeps them from permanently switching. Possibly Lincoln residents eyeing how much of their town would lose the excuse of watershed protection to prevent development.
 
I really do wonder what compromat someone has on the city that keeps them from permanently switching. Possibly Lincoln residents eyeing how much of their town would lose the excuse of watershed protection to prevent development.
It's nothing nefarious. They just can (and do) cite the 2010 Boston water emergency ad infinitum as reason for staying independent from the MWRA district. Cambridge was pretty much the only community inside of 128 that had drinkable water during the 4 days of the boil emergency that affected everybody else and gave the region a big economic hit. I remember it well. I was living in Cambridge at the time, and was pretty much the only person in my office who was able to shower that whole week.
 
That cuts both ways, though, except they get to pull from the Quabbin if things go sideways for their supply. Just a few years ago they had a delay getting new PFAS filters (after the numbers had been steadily rising...) and drew from Quabbin while they sorted it out. Didn't impact the MWRA communities at all.

 

Back
Top