Somerville Infill and Small Developments

Good for them to keep their house. I think it will be a more interesting urban/architectural outcome because of that too. Kind of like the old car mechanic hut thing in Union Sq.

IMG_7562.jpeg



IMG_7563.jpeg
 
“Their plan to replace the city’s crumbling old facility with a gleaming new one four times its size, and with scores of new units of affordable housing, hinged in part on buying the family home and building on top of it.

But even as they have offered ever more money, the owners of the house with the curved stoop and the garden out front have made it clear they aren’t going anywhere.

So now, as the Y begins finalizing a planned expansion, a decision has been made that may reverberate through the decades: Instead of buying the home, they will simply build around it……”

This doesn't seem to be new information? More than a year ago their concept plans already showed that they weren't going to be building on that parcel. I'm sure they wanted to buy the house and would welcome it if it worked out, but this idea that they had to pivot and redo the whole thing seems like a dramatization. What exactly was altered?

January 2025 meeting slides: https://replay.dropbox.com/share/mJaj5Kwj1iwzP61J?variant=v2&media_type=pdf
 
The family has every right to stay, but it's not going to be a fun place to live during or after the construction.

10 years down the road I hope it turns into outdoor space for the kids.
View attachment 70944
I peeked at Somerville's zoning atlas and I am thoroughly surprised that the "spite" property is zoned the lowest intensity residential use. I would think that the entire area around City Hall would be zoned for more dense development. Did the spite property owners get some change to zoning so the Y (or really any other developer) will be prevented from building bigger?
 
I think it went the other way. The Y up-zoned.
That would make more sense at least for the difference.

It is still surprising to me that the Somerville Zoning map isn't more ambitious with the zoning at this corner that is just a block or two from the Green Line station entrance and next to a large civic campus.
 
It was predictably old people and they have their reasons. “At this stage in their lives, stability, sunlight, privacy, and peace are more important than ever to them,” said Angela Terzides, their daughter. “Their preference remains to continue living in the home they have cared for and cherished for more than four decades.”

 
This is such a weird obsession by the Globe/Boston.com. Spite houses exist the world over and it seems awfully pointed that they keep on going after the Greek family.
 
It was predictably old people and they have their reasons. “At this stage in their lives, stability, sunlight, privacy, and peace are more important than ever to them,” said Angela Terzides, their daughter. “Their preference remains to continue living in the home they have cared for and cherished for more than four decades.”

It is still a free country. If they don't want to sell their house, that's completely up to them. It's not like eminent domain for a highway or transit project.
 
It is still a free country. If they don't want to sell their house, that's completely up to them. It's not like eminent domain for a highway or transit project.

Absolutely.

And that family is also free to experience the financial loss in market value on that house (or, really, their children will absorb the loss in market value) in not taking the original deal from the YMCA, before it envelopes that home in a much larger and busier surrounding.

But money isn't everything in life. As long as they understand, it's all good.
 
Last edited:
125 Lowell St (The Belmont- former Somerville Hospital nursing dorm) on March 21st

IMG_5558.jpg
IMG_5559.jpg


Very attractive in person. I just wish that we could simply build things like this again, but it would seem that we will have to with residential conversions being the only diamonds-in-the-rough for the foreseeable future.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top