đź”· Open Thread

wjHB3oX.png


https://ohiobusinessmag.com/2016/10/03/creating-healthy-cities/
.
 
That might be one of the craziest article I have ever seen. Did we just teleport back to the 1950s/60s or something. We already tried that it was a disaster.
 
I honestly thought is was from the 50's until I saw the term 'environmentally unfriendly' and my jaw dropped.
 
He is lecturing nationally on saving America’s cities through the American Program Bureau, and has written Saving America’s Cities.

Same here. I don't understand how he is giving a lecture series on this stuff. Who is paying to hear him speak this type of thinking hasn't been viewed as accurate for 30-40 years. Really anytime post Jane Jacobs.
 
Yes lets make all American cities look like Phoenix!!! The real estate market is doing so much better there compared to old dirty cities like Boston.
 
has been involved with building Kmart shopping centers

I'm having a hard time taking urban planning advice from a guy who's claim to fame is holding a leadership position at a dying franchise.
 
Why don't they resurrect a trolley line on Summer Street? Damm public transit used to be so much better in Boston.
 
Why don't they resurrect a trolley line on Summer Street? Damm public transit used to be so much better in Boston.

Get the Green Line connected through the Transitway and branches out of SL Way displacing SL2 to Design Ctr. and reanimating old SL3 (and pre-1953 GL branch) to City Point are not far-fetched in the slightest. Getting into the Transitway in the first place is 9/10ths the battle. But at least that's a battle we really don't have any choice but to wage.

If trolleys make it to SL Way, they'd just follow the diagonal connector between Haul Rd. and Summer that's supposed to be built for Conley Terminal trucks once property acquisition is squared on that parcel. That eliminates the traffic-snarling hard right the big rigs have to make onto Pumphouse Rd. for one that angles on a proper trajectory. In that case you'd probably lane-drop that ridiculously over-wide bridge, lay streetcar tracks in the former left lanes traffic separated left of the yellow line by rows of plastic pop-up dividers, then go regular street-running when Summer narrows after the Conley Haul Rd. turnout. Either on the 7 bus / old Green Line route on an E. Broadway/E. 1st loop or consolidated to one of those streets only. City Point station and any running up Farragut Rd. would be on a side reservation on the park grass.

If following the 7 loop verbatim, that's only 1.5 miles of pure street-running upon touchdown in Southie at the end of the Summer St. traffic separation and 2 blocks of restricted truck-only traffic between SL Way and Summer. Very doable for a schedule that runs thru to North Station/GLX, and pretty cheap to construct out of SL Way. Only half-challenge is how you do ADA stops on the street-running intermediates. You could either do curbside turnouts like they considered for Arborway restoration (not sure that would work too well here) or San Fran-style staggered slim-profile islands...which are very good for traffic flow with cars universally bearing right and trolleys/buses never getting blocked by a turnout, but somewhat more intensive snow removal jobs for keeping lanes + platforms from being squeezed by plow mounds. I'm just not sure the "PARKING IS WAR!" mentality in the neighborhood would allow any rows of spaces to get cannibalized for any transit improvements whatsoever.
 
https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2016/ ... story.html
https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2016/ ... story.html
https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2016/ ... story.html

Extremely well-done special spread in today's Sunday Globe about the 100th anniversary of the Summer St. Trolley Disaster. A fully-loaded City Point streetcar running inbound to South Station plunged off the Summer St. drawbridge over Reserve Channel when it was in process of opening for a tugboat, killing 46.

I'm sort of ashamed I had never heard of this before. I knew about the Molasses Flood and The Great Fire and Coconut Grove but this slipped under the radar.

I'm equally surprised it never came up in one of Whigh's anti-transit history lessons.
 
I'm so glad that Boston dosn't have those transit strikes. It must be because our bus drivers are paid over 35 bucks an hour.

No. It's because Boston doesn't habitually wait until the last minute. They've had plenty of tense negotiations with the Carmen's Union over the years, but they always get a head start and get it over with well before 11th hour. Rank-and-file understand management's got to squeeze. They just don't like an overtly hostile negotiation; nothing stresses them like not knowing if they're getting a paycheck next week because talks have been intentionally dragged out to the last minute to inflict maximum bricks-sweating. It ends up building trust over the long run that management's going to negotiate in good faith when parties get a head start. That's what ends up setting us apart from some of the nastier disputes that seem to afflict NYC/NJ/PA a lot more than here.

SEPTA bus + rapid transit (Regional Rail excluded because that's all RR unions) has had the most strikes of any transit agency in the U.S. This is a chronic problem down there dating back almost 40 years. And a lot of it has to do with 11th hour always being the primary negotiation tactic.
 
^don't disagree with you but having the highest paid transit employees in the country must help somewhat.
 
^don't disagree with you but having the highest paid transit employees in the country must help somewhat.

The T is hardly the only agency to produce an internal report claiming "highest paid" status. BART management claimed that a few years ago during their labor negotiation: http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/BART-workers-pay-plus-benefits-among-top-in-U-S-4723315.php. By some measures skewed more to drivers than ground and maint staff Chicagoland laps the field: http://www.usawage.com/high-pay/cities-bus_drivers_transit_and_intercity.php. And by some measures we're below-average and nearly dead-heat with the private sector: https://www.recruiter.com/salaries/...ransit-and-intercity&statewages=Massachusetts.

It's all a game of who can do the best job prostituting statistics, because no two transit agencies are exactly alike in size, proportions of employees in bus vs. train, proportions of employees in driver/attendant vs. premium-skill positions (also driven by train-heavier systems), and proportion or employees hired more recently as direct result of system expansion vs. systems with generationally static size and employment levels.

You can spin it any way you want and come up with a hometown "highest-paid" framing argument. And everybody does. BART, MUNI, the T, SEPTA, NJ Transit, Greyhound...everybody. (Except, oddly, New York where pay seems to lag the field under most parameters.) And everybody simultaneously has a solid point, while being simultaneously disingenuous in their presentation when stating their case.


Who'da thunk...complex and nuanced labor issues in a heterogeneous industry are complex and nuanced not easily boiled down to red-meat sloganeering?
 
Last edited:

Back
Top