OK, but basic market forces are never going to allow you to win that battle -- larger, affordable housing units in close proximity to major employment centers simply cannot happen. The real estate is too valuable.
OK, but basic market forces are never going to allow you to win that battle -- larger, affordable housing units in close proximity to major employment centers simply cannot happen. The real estate is too valuable.
^ Right, it's the old real estate adage:
Size, Price, and Location: choose any two
OK, but basic market forces are never going to allow you to win that battle -- larger, affordable housing units in close proximity to major employment centers simply cannot happen. The real estate is too valuable.
IMG_7419 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_7420 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_7422 by Bos Beeline, on FlickrI dont care if it meets current zoning, it should be the height of its neighbors... and more importantly how many affordable units will there be? Should be half anyway. The mayor and the BRA need to find a sweet spot between being pro development and forcing projects to have more affordable housing.
IMG_9512 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_9515 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_9517 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_7160 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_7158 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_7159 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_7162 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_7164 by Bos Beeline, on FlickrNot much new here but visited this really nice park today by bike and saw this development at the bottom of the hill for which not much seems to have progressed since the last photos on this thread ...
IMG_5813 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_5816 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_5808 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_5807 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_1867 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_1869 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_1872 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_1874 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_1875 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr