Addressing the housing crisis

I realize the law is a bit clunky, and some work needs to be done to improve it, I do support the ultimate goal. However, could the MBTA simply say "If you don't follow our new law, you lose your train station?
When Newton was debating its zoning, the Healey administration and Newton's congressman weren't too subtle about threatening to deep-six the commuter rail station rebuilds if something didn't get passed and if it didn't include more density around Auburndale.
 
When Newton was debating its zoning, the Healey administration and Newton's congressman weren't too subtle about threatening to deep-six the commuter rail station rebuilds if something didn't get passed and if it didn't include more density around Auburndale.

That would be a little ironic given the Riverside Station debacle.
 
However, could the MBTA simply say "If you don't follow our new law, you lose your train station?
This doesn't seem like a good idea. We should want more and better public transit for everyone so that people actually use it and want it funded better. If we give towns the power to shut down transit, some might just want to. And the harms are unlikely to fall on actual decision makers. We could easily cut down our transit network for no benefit.

If you want to get compliance, the state could threaten to withhold road funding. I'm not saying we should, but that would be better at getting towns to act.
 
The state could just pass a rezoning law setting zoning in these towns. Or it could remove zoning entirely and see what gets built. Just go direct if that’s what you want.
 
There’s no way that bill gets out of committee. As a formal matter, yes, they could, but in reality it would be a total dead end. This law is modest and very easy to not violate.
 
There’s no way that bill gets out of committee. As a formal matter, yes, they could, but in reality it would be a total dead end. This law is modest and very easy to not violate.
I know it wouldn’t pass but why pass round about sticks regarding bypassing existing train stations. Just over rule them if the state is that adamant in forcing the zoning.
 
I don't think the current law contemplates bypassing train stations...? The sticks are related to direct funding from the Commonwealth for infrastructure and related programs. Details below, just so we're clear:


Communities that fail to comply with the MBTA Communities Act automatically lose certain state funding, including funding: for local infrastructure generally, such as road, bridge, water and sewer improvements (known as MassWorks); for local infrastructure projects that support housing (known as HousingWorks); for EOHLC grants to communities with a “Housing Choice” designation; and state funding under the Local Capital Projects Fund.

In addition, the Healey-Driscoll Administration has notified communities that compliance with the MBTA Communities Act will be considered when dispensing certain discretionary local aid. Several programs potentially affected by that consideration are catalogued here.

In addition, intentional or persistent non-compliance may result in an enforcement action against the municipality by the Attorney General. Any such action would seek a court order requiring the community to comply with the law. Such a lawsuit is currently pending in the state supreme court against the Town of Milton.


The reason this law covers the scope that it does is because it's the local maximum between political possibility and policy improvements (from the perspective of those who passed the bill). While Tall is indeed Good, we shouldn't make Perfect the enemy of It.
 

Mayor Bowser unveils major office-to-housing conversion in downtown DC​


1721412485348.jpeg


“D.C. leaders gathered for a ribbon-cutting ceremony to celebrate the opening of Elle apartments in Northwest Thursday, marking the first significant office-to-residential conversion in the Golden Triangle Business Improvement District.

Elle, formerly home to the U.S. Treasury Department, offers 163 residential units. Prices range from $2,800 for a studio to $6,000 for a one-bedroom, with 111 units currently available……”

“At the event, Mayor Muriel Bowser unveiled the Office to Anything program, an initiative that encourages the transformation of vacant office buildings into retail spaces, restaurants, hotels and other uses by offering a 15-year temporary property tax freeze.

The eligible area encompasses all of downtown, as well as portions of NoMa and Southwest……”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/m...BB1pQ2cA?item=no_ads:true&ocid=BingNewsSearch

Previous building
1721412700295.jpeg
 
While looking into some info on Scape now that their project on Charlesgate West is approved, I was looking at their available units...

This is getting ridiculous:
View attachment 52953
Jaysus. In 2007, I lived for a hot second in a Brookline studio almost exactly this size and configuration (but with more storage), three buildings away from the old Holiday Inn on St. Paul Street. Rent? $750 a month.
 
Article regarding why housing is so expensive in Boston:


edit: I see that Charlie MTA already posted this same article in the "Idea for fixing the housing shortage" thread in the "Design a Better Boston" section
 
Last edited:
CityEstimated Yearly Budget Deficit (USD)Political
New York City$5.3 billionDemocratic
Chicago$1.2 billionDemocratic
Los Angeles$1.3 billionDemocratic
San Francisco$290 millionDemocratic
Oakland$200 millionDemocratic
Houston$200 millionDemocratic
Minneapolis$156 millionDemocratic
Austin$150 millionDemocratic
Seattle$140 millionDemocratic
Miami$100 millionRepublican
Boston$98 millionDemocratic
St. Louis$80 millionDemocratic
Salt Lake City$80 millionDemocratic
Baltimore$75 millionDemocratic
Detroit$60 millionDemocratic
Buffalo$50 millionDemocratic
Portland$45 millionDemocratic

A financial bleak picture for America's cities 10-Billion a year red for this group.
The only way out of this debt is Hyper-inflation in the future.
Outdated-Rotten Infrastructure-
Interest on the National Debt alone-is 658 Billion a year in the Red.

This ends very badly for our Freedoms and the United States.

1 Bedroom apts in the future will be luxury for the American working stiff. 10K a month.
This is the new modern day slavery- The American DEBT slave
 
Last edited:
CityEstimated Yearly Budget Deficit (USD)Political
New York City$5.3 billionDemocratic
Chicago$1.2 billionDemocratic
Los Angeles$1.3 billionDemocratic
San Francisco$290 millionDemocratic
Oakland$200 millionDemocratic
Houston$200 millionDemocratic
Minneapolis$156 millionDemocratic
Austin$150 millionDemocratic
Seattle$140 millionDemocratic
Miami$100 millionRepublican
Boston$98 millionDemocratic
St. Louis$80 millionDemocratic
Salt Lake City$80 millionDemocratic
Baltimore$75 millionDemocratic
Detroit$60 millionDemocratic
Buffalo$50 millionDemocratic
Portland$45 millionDemocratic

A financial bleak picture for America's cities 10-Billion a year red for this group.
The only way out of this debt is Hyper-inflation in the future.
Outdated-Rotten Infrastructure-
Interest on the National Debt alone-is 658 Billion a year in the Red.

This ends very badly for our Freedoms and the United States.

1 Bedroom apts in the future will be luxury for the American working stiff. 10K a month.
This is the new modern day slavery- The American DEBT slave
... Again, you have seemingly pulled numbers out of your ass at least as far as Boston is concerned. Again, much as the state constitution requires that the state budget be balanced, state law requires balanced municipal budgets. Not addressing the cities in the list I don't know about, but in FY23 Boston ran a 192M *Surplus* - certified free cash in MA Municipal speak. That surplus isn't likely to continue in quite that same size, but Boston hasn't actually drawn on those surpluses since COVID - something it's likely to continue .

1000035373.jpg
 
Again, much as the state constitution requires that the state budget be balanced, state law requires balanced municipal budgets.
This is generally true for municipalities across the country, including those on Johnny's list. But thanks for pulling up the actual data on Boston, it is sufficient to prove the point that he is working from a different reality.
 
CityEstimated Yearly Budget Deficit (USD)Political
New York City$5.3 billionDemocratic
Chicago$1.2 billionDemocratic
Los Angeles$1.3 billionDemocratic
San Francisco$290 millionDemocratic
Oakland$200 millionDemocratic
Houston$200 millionDemocratic
Minneapolis$156 millionDemocratic
Austin$150 millionDemocratic
Seattle$140 millionDemocratic
Miami$100 millionRepublican
Boston$98 millionDemocratic
St. Louis$80 millionDemocratic
Salt Lake City$80 millionDemocratic
Baltimore$75 millionDemocratic
Detroit$60 millionDemocratic
Buffalo$50 millionDemocratic
Portland$45 millionDemocratic

A financial bleak picture for America's cities 10-Billion a year red for this group.
The only way out of this debt is Hyper-inflation in the future.
Outdated-Rotten Infrastructure-
Interest on the National Debt alone-is 658 Billion a year in the Red.

This ends very badly for our Freedoms and the United States.

1 Bedroom apts in the future will be luxury for the American working stiff. 10K a month.
This is the new modern day slavery- The American DEBT slave

I'd say your historical amnesia is astonishing--but then of course I'd be willfully ignoring the fact that all you ever do is spout asinine MAGA/Fox News talking points.

The great fiscal crisis for America's cities is now.... (checks notes)... FIVE DECADES IN THE REAR-VIEW MIRROR.

To cite only the most legendary example: https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/the-night-new-york-saved-itself-from-bankruptcy

I look forward to continuing to gleefully mock your superlatively fact-free assertions for as long as you spew them all over this forum.
 
(pssst, the mute button works extremely well!)

Or our admins could just ban this idiot again since it's clearly TheRifleman by a different name.

I didn't agree with Odurandina and dont remember what he did to get banned, but at least once he was banned he had the honor to fuck off permanently.
 
... Again, you have seemingly pulled numbers out of your ass at least as far as Boston is concerned. Again, much as the state constitution requires that the state budget be balanced, state law requires balanced municipal budgets. Not addressing the cities in the list I don't know about, but in FY23 Boston ran a 192M *Surplus* - certified free cash in MA Municipal speak. That surplus isn't likely to continue in quite that same size, but Boston hasn't actually drawn on those surpluses since COVID - something it's likely to continue .

View attachment 53086
Why does the school budget keep increasing if the student population keeps decreasing?
 
Why does the school budget keep increasing if the student population keeps decreasing?
People Costs. Combination of collective
bargaining increases and increases in headcount. Keep in mind that BPS is an urban district that serves a disproportionate number students that need special services - BPS notes that 24% of their students and budget are accounted for by SPED. That's a much higher percentage than elsewhere in the state.
1000035393.jpg
1000035390.jpg
 

Back
Top