nico said:The original article says that the garage is owned by Urban Growth Property Trust. Does anyone know if this is the Interpark garage near the aquarium?
According to the guy who runs the interpark garage, interpark purchased their garage (perhaps interpark is owned by UG Property Trust...I'm trying to figure this out) near the aquarium for 87m a few years ago and were recently offered 175m. The garage is hugely successful, clearing over 30k/day and the company is not interested in selling the property for anything less than 250m.
I'm trying to figure out which garage this is. I'd walk down at lunch...but with today's heat it's probably not a good idea. I'm thinking that there are two garages...one beige, and one red brick
Anybody know?...Ron?
dirtywater said:Sel de la Terre is not in a garage; it is in an office building owned by Fidelity. Legal Seafoods is also in the building. Fidelity is building a park on Central Wharf to the south of this building and in between this building and the garage in question, which is often referred to as the Aquarium garage. The Aquarium itself is to the east of the new park being constructed (and almost completed) by Fidelity.
Imo that building deserves demolition before the garage. The views that are spoiled by that graceless lump...Ron Newman said:...the building between State and Central streets.
ablarc said:Imo that building deserves demolition before the garage. The views that are spoiled by that graceless lump...Ron Newman said:...the building between State and Central streets.
ablarc said:^ Remove it in your mind entirely, and see the void that would result. Now place into the void any building of similar footprint that you like.
Do this exercise looking towards the harbor, then do it again from the harbor.
Sure, its placement is inherently monumental, especially from the harbor, with skyline for background. That's partly what makes it so disappointing; it dominates that view like a fat man.TC said:Are you looking for a more monumental building for the location?
Arguing that damns both this building and the Greenway with faint praise. (I guess they both deserve it.)This building was completely renovated in the late ninety's and one could argue that it has the nicest facade facing the greenway after Rowes Wharf.
So is it the building itself you don't like, the location or both? Would it be fine if it were tucked into the financial district with other buildings of the same age? Or is it just unredeemable?ablarc said:Go out Long Wharf a spell to see the effect and the lost opportunity. Imagine a building like the Guggenheim Bilbao in its place: a building with artistic presence and cultural significance. The Boston Opera?
So is it the building itself you don't like, the location or both? Would it be fine if it were tucked into the financial district with other buildings of the same age and size? Or is it just unredeemable?ablarc said:Go out Long Wharf a spell to see the effect and the lost opportunity. Imagine a building like the Guggenheim Bilbao in its place: a building with artistic presence and cultural significance. The Boston Opera?
The Boston Opera?