Biking in Boston

Moreover, I think the Chestnut Hill carpet-bagger label is really going to stick and be a big issue in the campaign, so he may not even do as strongly with the conservative white dems as Essaibi-George did.
Right, Essaibi-George was legit from Boston, and while plenty of Wu's detractors complain that she is a carpet-bagger, the claims don't hold up well against somebody who has never lived here at all. Of course, that might not be the reason behind people using that label for Wu, in which case, they'll be happy enough with Kraft. There just aren't enough of them in the Boston electorate, though.
 
I’m glad to see so many viewpoints similar to my own about Kraft. I do worry that there is an incipient or potential coalition of conservative-types of many stripes that includes people whom you wouldn’t necessarily call conservative but that when it comes to infrastructurally progressive positions are quite reactionary, and these are found all over the city. So I wouldn’t write Kraft off, and I also wouldn’t write off his appeal to wealthy suburbanites—democracy or not, being able to purchase a zeitgeist can have indirect supportive effects in funny ways. I think in large part it’ll depend on Wu, of course, and if she were smart she would just hammer hammer hammer the carpet bag aspect. If he’d moved four years ago, that would be less absurd than 14 months ago. I also think what happens nationally will be crucial. If Trump (and his assault on the very ideas of progressive government) are widely panned by Bostonians who vote (which doesn’t necessarily mean Boston Globe readers), it’ll help Wu and make Kraft look far too cozy with right wing politics.
 
Right, Essaibi-George was legit from Boston, and while plenty of Wu's detractors complain that she is a carpet-bagger, the claims don't hold up well against somebody who has never lived here at all. Of course, that might not be the reason behind people using that label for Wu, in which case, they'll be happy enough with Kraft. There just aren't enough of them in the Boston electorate, though.
Wu’s lived here for years and actually served as a city councilor. Huge difference.
 
I also think what happens nationally will be crucial. If Trump (and his assault on the very ideas of progressive government) are widely panned by Bostonians who vote (which doesn’t necessarily mean Boston Globe readers), it’ll help Wu and make Kraft look far too cozy with right wing politics.

I hadn't even considered this, but you're right, this will be a huge factor. Wu will, rightly, position herself as a bulwark against Trumpism and that message is really going to resonate. Meanwhile, Jonathan Kraft's father is one of Trump's only personal friends in the entire world. He's paid lip-service to being anti-Trump and disagreeing with his father, but it's going to be reeaaaalllly hard for him to shake that association. And just wait until we see pictures of him with Trump or records of them meeting (and I'm willing to bet we will), then he'll be cooked.

Kraft might've been a strong candidate to succeed Menino, but he seems to be a uniquely poor fit for the 2025 electorate.

On the other hand...
I also wouldn’t write off his appeal to wealthy suburbanites—democracy or not, being able to purchase a zeitgeist can have indirect supportive effects in funny ways.

... I do worry about this. Kraft is a suburbanite who views the city through suburbanite eyes, but that also describes a majority of the Boston media.
 
I think his strategy seems to be targeting donations first. Even if Newton, Brookline, etc can't vote for Boston Mayor, they can donate money to who they want. Or create an anti-Wu PAC.

Honestly I'm waiting to see if he brings up Wu's purported anti-Italian discrimination... would show which kinds of Bostonians he's appealing to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FK4
I think his strategy seems to be targeting donations first. Even if Newton, Brookline, etc can't vote for Boston Mayor, they can donate money to who they want. Or create an anti-Wu PAC.

Honestly I'm waiting to see if he brings up Wu's purported anti-Italian discrimination... would show which kinds of Bostonians he's appealing to.
Beyond a certain level of financing he's already well got, how much does PAC-level money even matter in a Boston mayoral race? It's not like the office is going to be won or lost on TV advertising; local politics here just doesn't work like that. You've got to be able to pound the pavement and build coalitions of voters across multiple very different neighborhoods to win here. And these positions...just aren't going to do that. He'll collect a minority of grievance seekers and people who were dead-set against voting for Wu anyway, but he's so far been stunningly out of his depth at the kind of coalition-building that Essaibi-George was much better at 4 years ago in her loss.

It's like he's running for a race in a different city altogether. It's weird to watch.
 
I think his strategy seems to be targeting donations first. Even if Newton, Brookline, etc can't vote for Boston Mayor, they can donate money to who they want. Or create an anti-Wu PAC.

Honestly I'm waiting to see if he brings up Wu's purported anti-Italian discrimination... would show which kinds of Bostonians he's appealing to.

But I'm not sure he'll even get that much support for Newton and Brookline, both of which are pretty progressive these days (they both voted for the millionaire's tax, e.g.). There definitely are pockets of people in each city who rail against densification and bike lanes in their own backyards -- and of course many of them moved out of Boston because OMG SCHOOLS! -- but I bet most of those people would outwardly say they like Wu (cognitive dissonance is a helluva drug).
 
But I'm not sure he'll even get that much support for Newton and Brookline, both of which are pretty progressive these days (they both voted for the millionaire's tax, e.g.). There definitely are pockets of people in each city who rail against densification and bike lanes in their own backyards -- and of course many of them moved out of Boston because OMG SCHOOLS! -- but I bet most of those people would outwardly say they like Wu (cognitive dissonance is a helluva drug).
The suburbs are building bike lanes too! You have to get out to some pretty regressive places for there to be a pervasive lack of normalization for things like bike lanes on major urban/near-urban thoroughfares. It's just not got much shock value anymore, especially the ignorant argument that the lanes outright cause congestion. If you're in the City of Boston and not a total (car or otherwise) shut-in, it's hard to not have observed various bike lanes not causing daily carpocalypses. It's a small and steadily shrinking niche who are nursing a vote-galvanizing grievance about them.

I could sort of understand if he were advocating for pausing the buildout solely based on budgetary prioritization. Fiscal conservatives will at least warm to that, regardless of underlying motives. But to lead with the scare tactics about safety and congestion? Like...look around your own city. It's simply not happening, and the paint has been dry enough months and years in enough places that people have already adjusted enough to be starved of grievance fuel. He's pushing a viewpoint from one of the most regressive suburbs/exurbs on a mostly-adjusted city while trying to shake a very sticky carpetbagger label. It's hilariously inept.
 
I’m glad to see so many viewpoints similar to my own about Kraft. I do worry that there is an incipient or potential coalition of conservative-types of many stripes that includes people whom you wouldn’t necessarily call conservative but that when it comes to infrastructurally progressive positions are quite reactionary, and these are found all over the city. So I wouldn’t write Kraft off, and I also wouldn’t write off his appeal to wealthy suburbanites—democracy or not, being able to purchase a zeitgeist can have indirect supportive effects in funny ways. I think in large part it’ll depend on Wu, of course, and if she were smart she would just hammer hammer hammer the carpet bag aspect. If he’d moved four years ago, that would be less absurd than 14 months ago. I also think what happens nationally will be crucial. If Trump (and his assault on the very ideas of progressive government) are widely panned by Bostonians who vote (which doesn’t necessarily mean Boston Globe readers), it’ll help Wu and make Kraft look far too cozy with right wing politics.

Yeah I personally know a few small business owner types (think restaurants, small firms, physicians) who are kind of Romney Republicans but recognize the city we live in. They stick all of the left-of-center boogeyman stuff onto Wu no matter how absurd. If Kraft can pull these "pro business / anti-woke" centrist types while getting some focused support from the communities where he supported a few charities he could overperform, and if the national tailwind continues, it could be close. Still, Boston isn't Mass at large, and I do think the cynical "why don't I just buy this $2M condo to qualify" move will backfire.
 
The suburbs are building bike lanes too! You have to get out to some pretty regressive places for there to be a pervasive lack of normalization for things like bike lanes on major urban/near-urban thoroughfares. It's just not got much shock value anymore, especially the ignorant argument that the lanes outright cause congestion. If you're in the City of Boston and not a total (car or otherwise) shut-in, it's hard to not have observed various bike lanes not causing daily carpocalypses. It's a small and steadily shrinking niche who are nursing a vote-galvanizing grievance about them.

I could sort of understand if he were advocating for pausing the buildout solely based on budgetary prioritization. Fiscal conservatives will at least warm to that, regardless of underlying motives. But to lead with the scare tactics about safety and congestion? Like...look around your own city. It's simply not happening, and the paint has been dry enough months and years in enough places that people have already adjusted enough to be starved of grievance fuel. He's pushing a viewpoint from one of the most regressive suburbs/exurbs on a mostly-adjusted city while trying to shake a very sticky carpetbagger label. It's hilariously inept.
As is often the case, the bike stuff is often more about feelings than facts... but there are feelings that are out there now, and then there are untapped, potential feelings that can be drawn out/realigned/polarized depending on how things go.

However, I must say, to lead with "bike lanes" as one of the very first issues you bring as a new candidate for mayor of a major American city sounds fundamentally unserious... so in that regard, yes, more appropriate to a race for mayor of Stoneham, as you said before.

To stay with the bike lanes issue here, while there are a few areas where they have caused some slower traffic, the overall increase in traffic within Boston is real and is also clearly not related to bike lanes, but to more serious issues like cost of living forcing people to the periphery of the city, more delivery vehicles, etc.
 
However, I must say, to lead with "bike lanes" as one of the very first issues you bring as a new candidate for mayor of a major American city sounds fundamentally unserious

Every single Globe article from the first rumors of him considering running had some line about "maybe he can tap into frustrations over the overreach on bike/bus lanes" - it seems this is very much cause celebre among his genteel class compatriots.
 
I envy the reality you guys are living in.

I encounter ignorant Bostonians (yes, fellow residents of the City of Boston) blaming bike lanes for traffic regularly. These are not the “genteel” types, but rather almost exclusively working class without a college education.
 
I envy the reality you guys are living in.

I encounter ignorant Bostonians (yes, fellow residents of the City of Boston) blaming bike lanes for traffic regularly. These are not the “genteel” types, but rather almost exclusively working class without a college education.
No doubt! Plenty of regular working class Bostonions rely on cars for every day transportation and view the transportation system through a lenses much more similar to that of someone driving in from Weston than their neighbors walking/rolling/riding. What I think would separate the two is the level of priority they put on the issue, where the suburbanite would rate it above other issues of more pressing concern to the average working class Bostonion.
 
I envy the reality you guys are living in.

I encounter ignorant Bostonians (yes, fellow residents of the City of Boston) blaming bike lanes for traffic regularly. These are not the “genteel” types, but rather almost exclusively working class without a college education.
I don’t but I worry there are a lot more than people think. I check the NY Post and the Herald (the latter less often since it’s paywalled) and see a lot of conservative crap that I think is representative of more of a slice of the population — the local population — than we’d like to think.
 

The article is mostly about the Boylston St bus lanes, but there's a fair amount about the city's bike infrastructure.
“At this point in Boston’s evolution of roadway design, it is time to review what has been installed over the last fifteen years, adjust or redesign what has not been functioning well, and transition successful temporary safety fixes into permanent, beautiful infrastructure that enhances quality of life and matches the character of our neighborhoods,” [Mayor Wu] wrote.
The city will also establish an advisory group focused on transitioning “from temporary to permanent infrastructure that matches the form, function and history of our neighborhoods,” Wu wrote.
Wu said many of those projects have been successful, “but others have not.” She pointed to temporary bike lane installations that were outlined with paint and flexposts that have “been allowed to remain for too long without review or refinement” and have “become eyesores when plastic flexposts are repeatedly crumpled.”
 
 

The article asks a lot of questions it seems like the point was to answer and then never does that. No stats, no data, just repeating the anecdotes heard from people who emailed the author. This is front and center on the Globe's webpage this morning.
 

The article asks a lot of questions it seems like the point was to answer and then never does that. No stats, no data, just repeating the anecdotes heard from people who emailed the author. This is front and center on the Globe's webpage this morning.
I'm sure Kraft, John Henry, and the rest of the sports owners have at least a group chat... I'm kind of expecting more fluff pieces on topics Josh Kraft is focusing his candidacy on.
 

The article asks a lot of questions it seems like the point was to answer and then never does that. No stats, no data, just repeating the anecdotes heard from people who emailed the author. This is front and center on the Globe's webpage this morning.
I find the Globe's coverage of bike or pedestrian issues to be uniformly awful...and this is coming from a paying subscriber...
 

Back
Top