Biking in Boston

Several bike lane-related updates in Back Bay from a public meeting earlier this week:
  • Boylston St separated bike lane between Mass Ave and Arlington St starting construction soon
  • Berkeley St separated bike lane between Columbus Ave and Comm Ave happening sometime this year
  • Starting design on closing the gap with a separated bike lane project on Beacon St and Arlington St
  • Starting design on a two-way separated bike lane on Dartmouth St between Boylston St and Back St (connects to Esplanade footbridge)
Solid, safe, connected bike network taking shape in Back Bay that makes it easier for people outside the neighborhood to access it too.

Screenshot 2024-05-04 at 12.45.49 PM.png
 
Several bike lane-related updates in Back Bay from a public meeting earlier this week:
  • Boylston St separated bike lane between Mass Ave and Arlington St starting construction soon
  • Berkeley St separated bike lane between Columbus Ave and Comm Ave happening sometime this year
  • Starting design on closing the gap with a separated bike lane project on Beacon St and Arlington St
  • Starting design on a two-way separated bike lane on Dartmouth St between Boylston St and Back St (connects to Esplanade footbridge)
Solid, safe, connected bike network taking shape in Back Bay that makes it easier for people outside the neighborhood to access it too.

View attachment 50219
What's the timeline on the Boylston St lane? I thought it was one of the 2023 mayoral commitments.

The one major missing link is southbound from Back Bay to South End:
  • Exeter-Stuart-Dartmouth: fine on Exetero, Exeter-Stuart movement is not good at all then Dartmouth it self is no good.
  • Clarendon not shown for anything
  • Arlington is scary with all the folks racing to be first in line on the pike or the expressway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FK4
What's the timeline on the Boylston St lane? I thought it was one of the 2023 mayoral commitments.

The one major missing link is southbound from Back Bay to South End:
  • Exeter-Stuart-Dartmouth: fine on Exetero, Exeter-Stuart movement is not good at all then Dartmouth it self is no good.
  • Clarendon not shown for anything
  • Arlington is scary with all the folks racing to be first in line on the pike or the expressway.
Several bike lane-related updates in Back Bay from a public meeting earlier this week:
  • Boylston St separated bike lane between Mass Ave and Arlington St starting construction soon
  • Berkeley St separated bike lane between Columbus Ave and Comm Ave happening sometime this year
  • Starting design on closing the gap with a separated bike lane project on Beacon St and Arlington St
  • Starting design on a two-way separated bike lane on Dartmouth St between Boylston St and Back St (connects to Esplanade footbridge)
Solid, safe, connected bike network taking shape in Back Bay that makes it easier for people outside the neighborhood to access it too.

View attachment 50219
For the love of all that is holy, we need repaving before any lanes are installed. There is some attrocious pavement on Boylston and Dartmouth St (and Beacon) which is unrideable without a full-suspension mountain bike.
 
For the love of all that is holy, we need repaving before any lanes are installed. There is some attrocious pavement on Boylston and Dartmouth St (and Beacon) which is unrideable without a full-suspension mountain bike.
I hope they find a way to do some thing between Beacon Street (2018) with the majorly rough moon-like surface and Tremont Street (2023?) with the complete resurface and islands.
 
For the love of all that is holy, we need repaving before any lanes are installed. There is some attrocious pavement on Boylston and Dartmouth St (and Beacon) which is unrideable without a full-suspension mountain bike.
Slide 13 has the paving plans
 
View attachment 50274
The Carlton Bridge bike channels have still not been fixed
Interesting. I always bike up and down the ramps, but I was there last week with a group of other riders, some of whom chose to use the bike channels. They seemed to work for these riders, but I really wasn't directly watching their activity. I didn't get a good look at this side of the bridge, but I agree that the pictured channel doesn't look to be correctly positioned. The other side looked right to me, though. At any rate, I'll have to actually try using them next time, because I had assumed it was all set.
 
The Carlton Bridge bike channels have still not been fixed

They did make some modifications after people complained - the poles supporting the handrails used to go straight down, but as you can see in the photo, they are now offset to the side, which helps with pedal clearance. Doesn't help handlebar clearance though. If by "fix" you mean moving the runnels away from the edges, my understanding is that would create a trip hazard for people who need to use the handrail for support.

I personally haven't had an issue using the runnels (even before the handrail modifications), I just tilt my bike/hold it at an angle as I roll, and sometimes also rotate my pedals so the side near the wall is higher up and therefore gains more clearance from the tilt, if that makes sense. But maybe that's just my bike.
 
They did make some modifications after people complained - the poles supporting the handrails used to go straight down, but as you can see in the photo, they are now offset to the side, which helps with pedal clearance. Doesn't help handlebar clearance though. If by "fix" you mean moving the runnels away from the edges, my understanding is that would create a trip hazard for people who need to use the handrail for support.

I personally haven't had an issue using the runnels (even before the handrail modifications), I just tilt my bike/hold it at an angle as I roll, and sometimes also rotate my pedals so the side near the wall is higher up and therefore gains more clearance from the tilt, if that makes sense. But maybe that's just my bike.
Not had a problem with them too.
 
Hammond Pond Parkway road diet progress:

Not gonna lie, I will miss the way it was from a driver's standpoint, but it's the right thing to do, no question.
 
Not gonna lie, I will miss the way it was from a driver's standpoint, but it's the right thing to do, no question.

AFAIK they're keeping the double left turn lane at the north end, and leaving a generous amount of 4-lane each way at the south end before it tapers to 2, so I expect the practical throughput won't really change at all.

There's a lot of road diets I'm not all that thrilled about, but this one seems pretty much like it has about zero drawbacks for car users either - actually looks like the throughput in the modeling is expected to marginally improve for cars on the northern end, so this may actually represent a very slight capacity increase.
 
AFAIK they're keeping the double left turn lane at the north end, and leaving a generous amount of 4-lane each way at the south end before it tapers to 2, so I expect the practical throughput won't really change at all.

There's a lot of road diets I'm not all that thrilled about, but this one seems pretty much like it has about zero drawbacks for car users either - actually looks like the throughput in the modeling is expected to marginally improve for cars on the northern end, so this may actually represent a very slight capacity increase.
Yeah, I don’t think it will impact traffic much, either. It’s just a driver, it’s always nice to have another lane. That’s just the way it is. On the other hand, there is a sort of specific pleasantness to driving on capacious, one lane greenways.

I think dealing with HPP south of here will be harder, but the low hanging fruit is Newton Street in Brookline… I’m surprised this hasn’t been lane dropped by this point, and it’s a segment that actually has houses on it, so it would make a meaningful difference to residents. Also, West Rox Pkwy between Newton St and South St could very easily be tightened up to accommodate fully protected bike lanes and then some.
 
Yeah, I don’t think it will impact traffic much, either. It’s just a driver, it’s always nice to have another lane. That’s just the way it is. On the other hand, there is a sort of specific pleasantness to driving on capacious, one lane greenways.

I think dealing with HPP south of here will be harder, but the low hanging fruit is Newton Street in Brookline… I’m surprised this hasn’t been lane dropped by this point, and it’s a segment that actually has houses on it, so it would make a meaningful difference to residents. Also, West Rox Pkwy between Newton St and South St could very easily be tightened up to accommodate fully protected bike lanes and then some.
I feel the same way about Clyde/Lee St in Brookline. The inconsistent sidewalk is a pain in the butt and there's a lot of opportunity there for improvements.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FK4
I feel the same way about Clyde/Lee St in Brookline. The inconsistent sidewalk is a pain in the butt and there's a lot of opportunity there for improvements.
For almost two years, I biked to 1354 Comm Ave from South Brookline (close to Allandale Farm), and since I usually got off at 11 pm, and also had night classes in Cambridge. So I had daily long and late commutes home. Lee was always worrisome, but at least it had a shoulder up until Clyde, when the shoulder narrowed. But it was and remains the intersection with Grove that is the most dangerous… right at a big intersection where everyone is jockeying for position, you lose the whole shoulder and most of Grove has no bike lane, then you’re watching for cars speeding up to turn right on Newton. That’s the leg that really needs to be addressed now, in my opinion.
 
As Revere continues to make bike and pedestrian safety a priority, the city’s Planning and Community Development office is working on a Bike/Ped Master Plan in collaboration with the MAPC. The MAPC, Metropolitan Area Planning Council, is a government research organization that promotes smart growth and regional collaboration. In addition, they will incorporate The Landline Greenway Network which is a plan by MAPC to create a bike/ped network that connects cities throughout the Metro Boston region.
 
From the Globe on Sunday: I signed up to drive for DoorDash. Now I know why food delivery causes traffic chaos.

The author's intervention recommendations are fairly unimaginative:

Before the city or state chooses to implement a new fee, here are several things it should try:

• Adding loading zone spots on busy restaurant blocks, ideally with additional signage on the post to make it clear that these spots are open and free for food delivery drivers.

• Sharing these and other loading locations with the delivery app companies, which can then direct drivers to the closest loading zone as part of their navigation service.

• Reminding drivers in the app that they should use loading zones, parking meters, and free restaurant lots when available.

• Once there are more delivery loading zones, instructing meter readers and police to give more warnings and tickets to drivers who are not using the zones. (In Boston, the ticket for parking in a bike lane is $100.)

• Threatening a potential statewide delivery surcharge, similar to the Uber and Lyft fees, as a stick to get the app operators to take the issue of blocked bike and bus lanes seriously.

As mentioned earlier in the thread, I'm working on a study right now looking at best practices for preventing illegal standing/parking in bike lanes (thank you to everyone who took the survey about impacts, we got over 1300 responses!). Loading zone reform certainly has a part to play, but simply providing these and "reminding" drivers to use them will not make a significant impact. Other cities have been successfully piloting "smart" loading zones that essentially allow the reservation of loading zone space ahead of time. This works better for "institutional" delivery like UPS or business delivery as opposed to gig work, but can work well for gigs too if the gig apps can be compelled to comply, and compelled they must be. Traditional loading zone enforcement is becoming increasingly difficult because how is the enforcing agent supposed to know if the random toyota corrola in the loading zone is parked illegally or dropping an instacart order? Shifting as much of urban delivery, particular small scale deliveries like many gig apps tend to be, to e-cargo bikes, is also necessary. Some cities are piloting specific loading zones for cargo bikes, but these are ongoing and I don't have conclusive data to share.

In addition to loading zone reform, some other things that need to be taken into consideration:
*Scheduling. Blockages are most common at weekday peak hours. Creating incentive structures to encourage non-peak/overnight/weekend delivery can help alleviate some of the problem.

* Enforcement reform. Automated bus lane enforcement has been highly effective where implemented. California is expanding this to allow bus cameras to conduct enforcement on bike lanes. I could not find hard research on this, but several anecdotal instances where mandating cops do a certain amount of their shifts on bikes lead to a significant increase in enforcement. Citizen enforcement has also been highly successful in Malibu, where there is no bounty and you have to sign up and go through 96 hours of training to be a part of the program. Unfortunately even in NYC and DC this has been considered too politically toxic to go through with. One can only imagine the impacts of a robust program that includes a bounty.

* Construction. Right now there is no requirement to accommodate a bike lane that's disrupted due to construction/road work like there is with a sidewalk. This can and should be remediated.

* Design. Unsurprisingly, drivers block protected bike lanes less frequently than unprotected ones. Wider lanes, even unbuffered, also resulted in less blockages.

* There has to be a stick component. There has to be. I cannot over state the universality of disdain and dismissal received from both institutional and gig delivery drivers*, as well as the general "driving public" as seen in the facebook responses to municipalities that shared our survey.

Edit: to clarify, we did specific outreach to 15 delivery/rideshare driver communities on reddit.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top