It’s a nice 20+ mile round-trip ride, with only the obnoxious block of street ride in Bedford. However, giving up 90% state funding because a handful of folks want the dirt trail in the woods, is next-level NIMBY with a side of BANANA.
The vote last week in Bedford was something of a mess, but not necessarily for the knee-jerk reactions that are being spread online.
In short, the issue of paving the Reformatory Branch to extend the Minuteman out to the Concord line has been voted on at Bedford Town Meeting three previous times over the years (since 2005!), and at each step of the way the project has received the approval of Bedford voters. All the way back in 2010, for example, Bedford voters voted in favor of advancing the paved trail to final design. That vote in all practicality should have amounted to Bedford voters giving their stamp of approval to the the paving and extension project. A minority of voters in Bedford want to see the existing path kept as it is (which really isn't a totally ridiculous POV, albeit a somewhat selfish one), but the majority believe that paving it is for the greater good.
But the way New England Town Government elections work is that you can't just vote once to approve a project, you have to vote over and over at each twist and turn, and that can lead to issues. One twist that was not foreseen in earlier votes is that the Town of Bedford didn't
actually own all the right of way for the project, as everyone previously thought they did. In actuality, about 40 property owners that the Town (and everybody else) thought abutted the right of way actually own land under the path. So if you're travelling along the Reformatory Branch trail today, you're technically trespassing through tiny slices of a bunch of random people's backyards. Even the property owners
themselves didn't know that they owned the land until lawyers started combing through 50 years' worth of legal documents in performing the exhaustive due diligence required to allow Federal funds to be spent on the project. (If Federal dollars weren't at stake here, its likely that nobody ever would have found out about these ROW issues and the project would probably have happened without interruption).
The vote last week was actually two votes to address this issue: one vote to approve a $1.5 million expenditure to secure the necessary easements along the right of way, and a second vote to actually secure those easements through eminent domain. The first vote received about 58% of the vote, passing and authorizing the Town to spend the money to secure the easements. The second vote received about 60% of the vote (more than the first!), but
failed because
it required a 2/3 majority, while the first vote only required a simple majority (this requirement wasn't even totally clear at the meeting when the vote was taken!). So in short, voters approved the $1.5 million expenditure required to secure the easements, but didn't approve actually securing the easements themselves!
This is for sure a setback for the project, but it isn't the final nail in its coffin just yet. As the vote showed, this isn't about money and Bedford's voters are willing to pay the bill. And since we now know the trail crosses private property, that could bring up other issues which may need to be resolved in subsequent votes. For example, various utilities run along the ROW, which we now know means they actually run through private property. And people using the path are technically trespassing too. That raises all sorts of question marks outside of the issue of extending the Minuteman. Might private landowners now put up fences blocking the current path? If you like the path as is now, you might no longer be able to use it even in its current state without the Town securing those easements. How are the utilities going to handle this?
There's also a possibility that easements could be secured by third parties or through alternative methods other than those voted on at the Town Meeting, opening the door for the project to continue without eminent domain ever needing to happen.
A few other random factoids:
* 100% design for this project had already been completed and submitted.
* Even if the path through Bedford does get paved, it'll face a MUCH less receptive voting public on the other side of the Concord line. So we'll still get a paved path that turns to dirt in the woods between Rt. 61 and Great Meadows.