Biking the Boston 'Burbs (Trails, MDC, & Towns beyond Hubway area)

Past midnight all quiet, unlit, unobserved spots have this problem, whether they have a multiuse path or not.

So paths bring good whenever they're in use, and leave you no worse off when not in use. They are always a net win (though Dover comes pretty close to making a loser by insisting that theirs be *not* connected and therefore more a of a disused dead end, lowering its power to do good)

Arlington -- Yes, that is true up to the point where the path brings "bad" when only partially in use [by the bad guys]

However, the challenge of a long linear interface with land owners is difficult to resolve to the satisfaction of the residential property owner.

If you have a roughly square piece of land with limited access points such as a park or even conservation land -- You can place lighting at the entry points and a fence between the park and "my back yard." Typically, unless there is an overwhelming desire to cut through my yard as a bypass to a road, the fence will probably survive and suffice as a barrier controlling uninvited guests.

However, if your yard borders on a rail bed that has been converted into a mini-roadway the fence placed on the boundary provides a lot of opportunity to someone who wants access for their own purposes. The immediate solution of high light towers that work on commercial properties are not exactly popular in peoples' back yards. Nor would most homeowners favor thermal IR cameras viewing through the fence toward their yard.

To make that kind of residential land to path boundary effective and acceptable to the homeowner -- you need a buffer of evergreens on the property owner's side of the fence and a well lighted path. -- This adds to the expense for the path's construction and maintenance and operation.
 
It needs to be resurfaced if it is to be anything more than a recreational trail. Here is what the surface looks like at its best:

mhzvah.jpg


A nice walking trail, don't get me wrong, but a far cry from commuting corridors in Cambridge and Somerville.

That's because it was cheap. They brought in Iron Horse Preservation to do the rail removal and preliminary grading. IH has the know-how and the equipment to do a good job, but they have to be well-supervised to ensure they behave themselves. That's how you get a well- brush-cut trail with level surface, fine crushed stone acceptable for multipurpose use, drainage issues and washout-prone sections of roadbed properly addressed (or at least well-mapped as problem spots for future fixes if more invasive culvert work is needed later), sprayed for weed control, with all trash and discarded rail hardware properly picked up. You won't get a paved trail or wood decking at lookout points; Iron Horse doesn't have that in-house capability. But you'll get an acceptable starter trail clean enough for problem-free finishing touches and cleanly surveyable for future upgrades like paving. Or you net a good prep job so the professional landscapers and pavers like DCR can come in and finish the job without problems. Needham got itself an effective base surface here. What they choose to do with it in the future is up to them, with motivation level for upgrades dependent on what it connects to. Ball's in Dover's court if Needham is to see a future where this gets further tarted up and manicured.

Needham/Newton and Watertown all employed Iron Horse, spent the money to do their own trail design, and gave onsite supervision to Iron Horse for following the letter of that design. When the first segment of the Watertown Greenway was being cleared I walked to the back parking lot of the Mall and sat around for a Saturday picnic lunch watching them work at clearing out the weed-choked, trash-strewn ROW behind the Mall. They worked like a well-oiled machine, and there were a couple town DPW supervisors going back and forth barking out orders, rummaging around in the fresh-cut brush to ID any railroad ties that inadvertently got dropped in the undergrowth when they were stripping the roadbed, going through checklists of next-steps after they got their first looks at the now-daylighted roadbed, and making sure that when they ran the bulldozer over the rock ballast that a divot-free surface was left behind for the DCR trucks. I came back the following weekend to see it cleared; trail hadn't even been built yet, but the roadbed was nicely smoothed out and almost looked usable as-is. It was totally ready for DCR to come in and do its thing with the full landscaping and pave job.


Then there's the other side of the coin: the unsupervised Iron Horse jobs. IH has this lovey-dovey sales pitch about them being a preservation-minded nonprofit willing to build a "free" landscaped trail done entirely by them in exchange for the scrap proceeds of the rail hardware. It's pitched as being perfectly cash-neutral, everybody wins, everybody feels self-satisfied, blah blah blah. And they're very effective at sticking to their talking points in front of a skeptical Board of Selectmen when the inevitable questions get raised about how they can pitch it in such "free as in beer" terms. Danvers, Lynnfield, and Methuen all brought in Iron Horse and took the full hands-off "free" trail package. Danvers/Lynnfield did it because they were impatient waiting for DCR to come in and wanted something interim in place to keep the final landscaping commitment from getting jerked around in the state TIP budget. "Free" was seductive because of their impatience. Methuen was just flat-out naive, asked no questions, did no follow-up.

Iron Horse ended up doing complete shit jobs on the Topsfield Branch and Manchester & Lawrence: trash and toxic discarded ties left behind or improperly disposed, barely brush-cut, lumpy roadbed full of un-leveled divots where the ties used to be, washouts galore (Danvers would end up impassible in spots after every winter), skimpy quantities of spread crushed stone with the surface mostly the old bike-unrideable railroad rock ballast, and roadbed left un-level at grade crossings creating ADA access issues. Iron Horse had skipped town and pocketed a large profit off the scrap rail before anyone realized the mess they left behind. The "free" deals had no indemnification for shoddy work, so public money had to be spent to clean up the mess. Which usually involved local-yokel Boards of Selectmen and Legislators trying to sandbag DCR with the fix, or the all-volunteer trail lobbies who initially promised to maintain the trail by doing annual trash pickup suddenly going AWOL. This "Iron Horse Scam" has been perpetuated all around the Northeast by gullible towns who take in the "free" offer, and the states--MassDOT in particular--have let themselves get ripped off time and again for the scrap rail hardware without getting equivalent value in return.


It's a fine line. You either do what Needham/Newton and Watertown did by paying the going rate for control over the design and supervising thoroughly enough to keep an otherwise capable subcontractor fully on-the-level. Or cede that control and get robbed blind by known scam artists. This is why states like New Hampshire and Connecticut centralize all rail trail construction on publicly-owned landbanked ROW's at the DOT/state-EPA level as designated state parks and don't allow the towns or trail lobbies any direct control over construction. Even in cases where it's just a bare unmaintained trail like NH's network of limited-liability "as-is" snowmobile rail trails. Some states even have laws that rail hardware has to be removed by default within X years after abandonment--under state supervision by state-approved contractors--on all abandoned ROW's that aren't formally set aside as going concerns (i.e. reactivation candidates, or rail-with-trail preservations that allow recreational track 'speeder' vehicles such as a couple old lines in Maine). Done as a control over the environmental considerations over discarded ties, and to keep scavengers from ripping the states off on rail scrap the states themselves can recoup money on. In hyper-balkanized Massachusetts, unfortunately, it's every man for himself and all kinds of ratfuckery gets perpetuated in the name of trail politics. The only thing you can say for a more hopeful future is that there's so few abandoned and unspoken-for ROW's left to fight over in this state that there's few opportunities for the "Iron Horse Scam" to rear its ugly head again.



^^What does this have to do with Needham/Dover? When Dover talks about going bare-bones, that signals an unwillingness to apply the supervision Needham did to make sure the job gets done right and the trail--crushed-rock and barebones as it is--has a usable surface. The BCRT lobbyists pushed the "free" trail sales pitch hard on all the towns on this corridor (suspiciously hard), even to point of arguing against town-supervised design as it would slow things down. Needham/Newton did their homework and weren't comfortable leaving Iron Horse unsupervised; they chose their M.O.'s. Dover? Read the tea leaves and they are MUCH more likely to not appropriate a cent and just let Iron Horse do whatever the hell it wants. So not only is there risk of an intentionally unmanicured trail...but it's at risk of all the bad behavior evidence left behind with other "Iron Horse Scam" victims. Lumpy surfaces inappropriate for bikes, washouts galore (and there's a couple rock cuts on this line that are notorious for drainage issues), near-nonexistent weed control, shit grading at street crossings, and improperly disposed waste tossed to the side of the roadbed in the middle of the Charles River watershed.

It's crucial that if this initiative in the town passes that the commitment gets held to a real supervised trail design. If not as complete as Needham's, then at least with somebody steering the ship. Because evidence abounds at what happens when Iron Horse is left to their own devices: an otherwise competent outfit becomes born bad actors. Any commitments to build that then subsequently get watered down with less and less town involvement have to get taken as a worrisome sign that this is really, really not going to end up a usable trail. Certainly the concerns don't end--not by a longshot--if the vote passes. Dover has to be kept honest every day until the ribbon-cutting ceremony. Are there enough hands holding their feet to the fire to ensure that?

Then consider the effect on Medfield. Medfield has little to no reason to supervise its trail portion if Dover disengages itself and lets Iron Horse take them for a ride. Medfield then becomes more likely to take the "free" trail too because doing an effective supervision stops mattering when Dover is the weak link in the chain. They'd be motivated to get a contiguous trail for continuity's sake, but no more. And you can't really blame them for thinking that way. That doesn't leave much of a future for the corridor. The active tracks from Route 27 to downtown Millis probably aren't going to be active in 10 years. Right now they're only being used once or twice a month during warm weather to take hopper cars of rocks CSX drops off from Framingham 1 mile down to Environmental Rd. so a local gravel company a short distance away from the tracks can side-load into their trucks. Chances are that inefficient operation isn't going to last long, and with the line having no other prospects it's likely to go abandoned in short order. Then you've got a chance at a contiguous trail to West Medway another 7 miles away, and potential to grab one of the many power line ROW's converging out of there to connect straight to the twin Upper Charles paths in downtown Milford. Maybe even grab the near-100% intact Boston & Pascoag ROW to Blackstone to hook into the Air Line/SNE Trunkline trail. A lot of extensions that have to get strung together to join it to the greater Eastern and Central MA trail networks, but something an incremental 20-year effort can accomplish at netting something truly useful and well-connected to other suburban trails.

None of that happens if Dover--the linchpin of all that future potential--pulls a ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.
 
^
Yeah - Iron Horse also did the Northern Strand - including the Everett portions prior to repaving - and it was totally lumpy, as you said.
 
Two helpful little nuggets for Somerville, Medford, and Everett.
1. An MBTA project to repair and replace the bulkhead at the Charles Bus Facility includes a space for a multi-use path along the Mystic River. This will create an off-road connection between Draw 7 park/Assembly Square and Alford Street. This connects large amounts of Somerville and Medford (via Mystic Reservation paths) to all of Charlestown and the Harborwalk.
2. MassDOT is replacing the Route 16 Woods Bridge over the Malden River. The bridge will have pedestrian/bicycle underpasses on each side of the river. This connects Wellington to Malden Center and the Northern Strand Trail.
Lots of good connections throughout this area.

Both of these would be huge improvements. Have they released any plans for either of these? timeline? My biggest complaint about the new bike infra is that they are not creating a network, they are creating random stretches that mostly do not connect well (Alewife being the notable exception)
 
Thanks for that great write up F-line. Dover passed their town meeting item on Monday to "allow the Board of Selectmen to enter negotiations with the MBTA, current owners of the abandoned railbed, to acquire a lease, easement or license for the property." I foresee more meetings and reports before Dover their trail, but ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ averted for now:

http://dover.wickedlocal.com/news/20160503/dover-town-meeting-rail-trail-proposal-moves-along

And speaking of the Iron Horse, the Northern Strand, and incremental upgrades, there's a great piece with perhaps the worst headline I've ever seen in my life on the history behind the Northern Strand. Trail politics suck but are hardly genocide:

Trail of Gears: Winslow’s journey to bike to the sea


Now that there is a usable trail the Bike to the Sea advocacy group and the towns are going back and making upgrades. Malden wants raised crossings and better walking and biking routes to the trail. Bike to the Sea put in for grants to light the entire trail, and to pave the Saugus and Revere segments.
 
I did a spittake at this quote from that article:

Ingrid Barry of Danvers recruited Iron Horse Preservation of Nevada. In 2012, the worth of commodities was high; steel was valuable. Iron Horse Preservation committed to ripping out the rails for resale. Winslow remembers, “Without Iron Horse, we would not have had the breakthrough to get things going, it got the ball rolling.”
In 2012, Everett had its rails ripped up, Saugus ripped in 2014. Iron Horse began rail removal in Revere, but the Nevada company didn’t realize the challenges of the New England weather and other logistical setbacks drove the company out of business. The city of Revere finished their portion of the work with the help of Bike to the Sea Organization.
No, actually that's not true at all. Iron Horse is alive and well (as a nonprofit...NOT a limited-liability corporation), and just last year got sued by Salem, NH for the pile of rail ties they left behind for over 3 years when they skipped town after stripping the Manchester & Lawrence ROW between the state line and Rockingham Park for another one of their shit 'freebie' jobs. Their website may not have been updated in 4 years, but a Google search shows Mr. Hattrup quite very active the last couple years playing his Lyle Lanley act at various town meetings across the Northeast. They're doing a trail in Kingston, NY right now.

Speaking of "supervision", the only reason Newton had a happy ending is because the town started applying that supervision on Iron Horse once the usual warning signs started surfacing about their credibility: http://village14.com/newton-ma/2014/12/is-the-upper-falls-greenway-a-victim-of-a-ponzi-scheme/.
I’m not a lawyer — and perhaps there’s another term to explain Iron Horse’s business model — but it sounds like a Ponzi scheme to me.
Like I said, the only heartwarming thing about this is that there are hardly any abandoned ROW's left in 5 of 6 New England states that still have rail hardware in the ground...and the ones that do (mostly Maine) by-law lock down disposal of their rail hardware with the DOT. Thus there are few opportunities left for IH to sell their snake oil to gullible municipal gov'ts. Unfortunately it only reached that point after they were allowed 7 or 8 bites at the apple to pull this scam in MA and NH over the last 8 years.

Iron Horse will probably de-camp from New England (they have a--*snerk*--"East Coast Operations Office" in Nashua) after Dover-Medfield is done and go grifting for greener pastures in New York and Pennsylvania, where abandoned ROW's are plentiful and smashmouth town-level politics is an art form. Maybe even go off-the-grid for awhile before resurfacing because scrap prices are currently way down from their 21st century highs of a few years ago. Doubleplus beware to Dover and Medfield if they retain IH's services again, because Hattrup's likely to squeeze his quality control twice as threadbare to cover his ass amid the downturn.


It can't be said enough: state-owned transportation corridors should be managed at the state level, including their disposal. Like CT and (Rockingham County excluded) NH have done drama-free for decades now. Little to nothing good comes from letting the inmates run the asylum, and that includes the "good" end results that took years of senseless clown show before they ended up "good". Massachusetts may not have any rail scrap left to be fleeced out of, but it's still got many many trail proposals on state-owned corridors getting grifted upon by town-level opportunists. We'd have hope of a much more extensive trail network being built much faster, prioritized to the highest-upside corridors first, with less cost bloat and fewer tears of impotent rage if somebody took a teachable moment from all this and made a move to centralize planning and execution. It doesn't have to be the end of the nonprofit trail conservancy organizations; Connecticut has those too as local partners for maintaining its miles of "linear state park" corridors. But our neighbors do this with a hell of a lot less of a day-in/day-out shitshow than Massachusetts does. That's not a 'feature' we need to live with, even if we are wedded to our cromulently balkanized system of local governance.
 
Last edited:
Both of these would be huge improvements. Have they released any plans for either of these? timeline? My biggest complaint about the new bike infra is that they are not creating a network, they are creating random stretches that mostly do not connect well (Alewife being the notable exception)

Timeline for Woods Bridge is soon. One of the May Orange Line shutdown weekends is to facilitate this bridge work. Will take time as this is a big project.
Timeline for Charlestown is a little longer. Just cleared MEPA so they have some more engineering/permitting to do. MBTA is going to make the space for it. DCR has to get the money to do the path. They should have a fairly easy time finding the $ for this. It is a big priority for them.
 
Construction of the Minuteman connector/light in Arlington Center is progressing slowly. Road has been cut up and plates put down. Lots of oil slicks on Swan Pl.
 
More good news for the Bruce Freeman Rail Trail in Acton and Concord. I was driving through Acton the other day to visit family and I saw that early bridge work has started on route 2A. The giant piles of rail ties are all cleared, utility relocation is complete, and they are 75% done with erosion control.

At the Concord town meeting, they passed 4 articles that relate to the BFRT. The most significant, article 57, allocated $250,000 for the 100% design of phase 2b. This bridge will go over route 2 near the state police horse barracks and the concord rotary. The town meeting vote keeps phase 2b on schedule for the 2018 TIP phasing.

The BFRT went 4/4 and they all apparently were nearly unanimous. Hopefully other affluent suburbs can learn from Concord's surprising willingness to build trails (looking at you weston).


BFRT newsletter: http://brucefreemanrailtrail.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/BFRT-News-Spring-2016.pdf

Disregard the atrocious composition - looks like they're doing some serious work over there!

94Fb17c.jpg


4UPo9UG.jpg
 
The Bruce Freeman project is so vast, (and so far out beyond 128) that I, for one, needed a context map (which comes from http://brucefreemanrailtrail.org/trail-map/trail-maps/ and is available as a PDF)


..and it'd be pretty sweet if they ever put a bike path atop/along the aqueducts from Quabbin-Worcester-Newton-Boston. (hinted at by their inclusion, above)

They really need the south-flank aqueduct trail to connect the Upper Charles terminus to the Freeman to fill that Framingham gap blocked by active train lines and train yards. Connectivity's virtually perfect and unbroken if they can do that one, requiring only bike lanes across 5 city blocks to get across downtown and pick back up hugging the west side of Farm Pond to reach FSU and the Bruce trail-head. Give Framingham some long overdue fun bux to smooth over their dumpster fire of a downtown traffic pattern and that'll do it.


I still think the big prize is plowing south of Milford along the power line ROW to hit Bellingham Jct. That's where they can establish a link-up with the future Medway end of the Bay Colony trail after the Millis Industrial Track inevitably gets abandoned in the next 10 years and clears the way from Medfield Jct. for a straight Needham-Bellingham connection to the rest of the network.

Then after that they really should set a 20-year goal of acquiring easements on the completely intact Boston & Pascoag ROW to Blackstone along a bunch of abandoned sandpit access roads to hook up with the SNE Trunkline Trail. Connecticut is chipping away at its missing-bridge Air Line gaps, and is about to hook up the Charter Oak Greenway that abuts I-384 to the Hop River Trail at Bolton Notch (which then connects to the Air Line at Willimantic). Phase II plans to extend the Charter Oak west across the 2-mile gap to the Charter Oak Landing side path that goes over the Charter Oak Bridge and dumps onto the riverfront trail in Downtown Hartford.


Seriously...completion of projects already planned and in incremental construction in 2 states, with some needed Aqueduct gap-filler gets you an additional. . .

  • 2.5 miles of power line ROW south of Milford to Bellingham Jct.
  • 5 miles of combo power line and intact abandoned rail ROW south of Bellingham Jct. to the SNETL trail
. . .away from having a contiguous route locked-down from Downtown Hartford to Downtown Boston.


  • Start: Old State House, Hartford

  1. Charter Oak Landing skywalk + Riverfront Park
  2. Charter Oak Greenway (incl. existing HFD-E. HFD river crossing)
  3. Hop River Trail
  4. Air Line/SNE Trunkline
  5. Boston & Pascoag ROW
  6. Upper Charles Trail south extension to Bellingham Jct.
  7. Upper Charles Trail (either one, if the west flank gets completed to meet the east flank at the north end)
  8. Acqueduct through Downtown Framingham
  9. Bruce Freeman
  10. Central Mass
  11. Fitchburg Line Belmont side path
  12. Fitchburg Cutoff Path
  13. Somerville Community Path
  14. Lechmere Viaduct sidewalk or widened cycle path
  15. Esplanade

  • Finish: MA Old State House, Boston Common + Freedom Trail

Yeah, that's a lot of steps over 130 miles. But it's absolutely mind-blowing that you'd realistically be able to do this in our bicycling lifetimes on one trail surface that has literally only about 12 city blocks' worth of on-street detours on it sprinkled across 2 states.



And this no-foolin' can be contiguous in 20 years if the planners unify under one umbrella, get some high-profile investment from the East Coast Greenway folks, and square a consistent liability policy with the power companies so they're receptive and not reluctant. B&P ROW is the only uncertain acquisition because it's unclear who owns the barrenness around it, but all-hands-on-deck effort to close all gaps around it ought to compel the investment on a connecting ROW that's almost totally un-abutted.
 
F-Line, I'm consistently astounded by your knowledge on these rail and trail issues. I'd be grateful for your thoughts on how to close a gap in the system. Currently, the Reformatory Branch ends in Concord Center, the Bruce Freeman will bisect West Concord, and the Assabet River Rail Trail will end at South Acton. I'd love to see a connector go from South Acton to Concord Center, crossing the BFRT, in effect, joining these three trails. The gap is clear in the map above--more or less connecting the Reformatory to the Assabet. The Baystate Greenway plan, and a few other plans, envision extending the Reformatory Branch along the old ROW to the BFRT at MCI Concord, but I think that's a pipe dream due to two river crossings, a Route 2 crossing, and a couple unfortunate housing developments on the ROW.

I think I've got an alignment that would work from South Acton to West Concord, following River Street in Acton, then crossing some WR Grace land that is in clean-up mode, then maybe some rail-with-trail into West Concord Junction. But how to get from West Concord to Concord Center? Is a rail-with-trail remotely feasible?
 
F-Line, I'm consistently astounded by your knowledge on these rail and trail issues. I'd be grateful for your thoughts on how to close a gap in the system. Currently, the Reformatory Branch ends in Concord Center, the Bruce Freeman will bisect West Concord, and the Assabet River Rail Trail will end at South Acton. I'd love to see a connector go from South Acton to Concord Center, crossing the BFRT, in effect, joining these three trails. The gap is clear in the map above--more or less connecting the Reformatory to the Assabet. The Baystate Greenway plan, and a few other plans, envision extending the Reformatory Branch along the old ROW to the BFRT at MCI Concord, but I think that's a pipe dream due to two river crossings, a Route 2 crossing, and a couple unfortunate housing developments on the ROW.

I think I've got an alignment that would work from South Acton to West Concord, following River Street in Acton, then crossing some WR Grace land that is in clean-up mode, then maybe some rail-with-trail into West Concord Junction. But how to get from West Concord to Concord Center? Is a rail-with-trail remotely feasible?

No, because of the Sudbury River, Route 62, and Assabet River rail bridges and the Route 2 overpass. They don't have an inch of side room to spare. You're going to have to on-street it from Concord center along 62 or Elm and find a way to get a grade separated crossing above or below Route 2. There's no easy answer to this. The Reformatory Branch was severed at Lowell Rd. way back during the mid-Depression, while the intact part east of Lowell lasted until 1960. To reach West Concord it crossed the Assabet an insane 3 or 4 times and dove up north by the prison. You can't replicate even a little bit of that route anymore.
 
Billerica is moving forwards with the Yankee Doodle Bike Path and have now reached the 25% design state. This is the northwards continuation of Bedford’s Narrow-Gauge Trail Trail along the Billerica and Bedford Railroad right of way, with some big detours. The article describes security concerns by schools, wetlands impacts, and steep slopes as responsible for the routing:

Document
 
Billerica is moving forwards with the Yankee Doodle Bike Path and have now reached the 25% design state. This is the northwards continuation of Bedford’s Narrow-Gauge Trail Trail along the Billerica and Bedford Railroad right of way, with some big detours. The article describes security concerns by schools, wetlands impacts, and steep slopes as responsible for the routing:

A nice effort, I suppose, but they shouldn't be shocked when a certain % of users decide Concord St is better than Sections 3&4 and that BMX'ing the straight (RR) part of Section 2 (that's already in Google Maps) is better than going around.

Have you got a link to Billerica's page? And does the Narrow Gage trail actually get as far as the right side of the map?

In April 2016, I was looking for the end of the Narrow Gage Trail at Springs Rd (where the Narrow Gage trail's brochure says it is supposed to end at location (17)) and it looked completely overgrown (similar to this August 2015 Streetview) and unused.
 
Last edited:
Praise for a changing DCR:
On the Mystic Valley Parkway, along the upper lake in Winchester, after repaving,
The repainting moved the shoulder line about 18"~24" toward the centerline and added dashed lane lines at parking areas . Both huge improvements for bikes. The painted margin on the asphalt, which functions as a bike lane, has gone from about 4' to about 6'. Meanwhile the main lane has been narrowed correspondingly. Something like 14' to 12' or 12 to 10 (maybe this will slow those who drive 45~50 down to the 35 limit.

Bike it --it feels much safer. The lower lake section (in Medford) had shoulder lanes that feel 5' ish...somewhere between Winchseter's new and old.
 
Last edited:
Everett was awarded $150k for design work to extend their trail south to the Wynn casino:

Mayor Carlo DeMaria

I am very pleased and excited to announce that the Massachusetts Gaming Commission just approved a $150,000 grant for the City of Everett. This grant will allow us to conduct a study on the feasibility and design of extending the Northern Strand Community Trail from the path’s end at West and Wellington Streets to the new Wynn resort. Wynn has already agreed to incorporate a bike trail from this connection into Boston. Soon, people will be able to ride from Lynn all the way into Boston on Bike to the Sea, with no traffic or safety concerns.


I want to thank the commission members who approved this much-needed trail, and those who offered letters of support.
 
Everett was awarded $150k for design work to extend their trail south to the Wynn casino:

Any renders on how they plan to do that? They'd have to break due-west from the trail head down Wellington to the Best Buy parking lot and cross the terrifying rotary to get over to the Mystic View Rd. path in order to do it. The T's ballast pile blocks access to the parkway underpasses since both siding tracks are actively used. Spalding St. is the truck access to said ballast pile and has an inconveniently steep embankment for trying to worm around the sides of the parkway. And even if it were possible to get under those overpasses there's no break south of the parkway along the tracks in the abutting swamp, side embankments, and power line reservation on the side embankments for scaling the hill onto Gateway Ctr. backlot terra firma.


Is this all contingent on MassHighway building the replacement river crossing and snaking a ped underpass at the riverbank? Otherwise the Great Wall O' 16 makes this a does-not-compute for direct access to Wynn "with no traffic or safety concerns".
 

Back
Top