Boston College Master Plan

Re: Boston College Master Plan debut

Colleges and universities are absolutely NOT subject to zoning codes. While any building they construct is subject to city review, it cannot be legally challenged on the basis of variances granted. Any property owned by a university is included under the umbrella of the institutional masterplan, which is bullet proof to existing zoning codes and legal challenge.
Perhaps we are in disagreement on the definition of a zoning code. I was mainly thinking of use.

In the case of Harvard and Allston, there is a master list of uses that are allowed or prohibited on the land Harvard owns in N. Allston. For example, Harvard could build/operate a billiard parlor in Allston Landing North, but not in Allston Landing South. BC, BU, and Harvard (other than the Allston land supra) are allowed to build billiard parlors on property they own. Harvard can build an art gallery in Allston Landing North, but not in Allston Landing South. Harvard is prohibited from building any sort of housing on Allston Landing South.

See: Table C @
http://www.cityofboston.gov/bra/pdf/ZoningCode/Article51.pdf

(Table C also covers BU and BC.)
While any zoning code is subject to a variance, I believe that Harvard or any other university has to be guided by the list of allowed and prohibited uses when it develops an institutional master plan.
 
Re: Boston College Master Plan debut

From today's Globe:
Menino and Boston College clash over payments

July 8, 2008 03:25 PM

By Peter Schworm, Globe Staff
In the latest clash in an increasingly public quarrel, Boston Mayor Thomas M. Menino today called upon Boston College to increase its voluntary payments to the city to offset the tax revenue the city will lose because of the school's recent $67 million purchase of a high-rise apartment complex on Commonwealth Avenue.

As part of its $1 billion expansion plan, the college wants to turn the building, about one-third of a mile from the university's Chestnut Hill campus, into a dormitory for more than 500 students. As nonprofits, colleges are exempt from taxes on most of their property.
Menino announced his opposition to the expansion plan last week and urged the college to house all its students on its main campus. College officials say the main campus, which has 4,700 students on 40 acres, is too crowded to build the necessary dorm space, and they need to convert the Commonwealth Avenue property to meet the housing demand.

Today, Menino, through his spokeswoman, took aim at the college. "He believes BC should make that up somehow," said Menino press secretary Dorothy Joyce. "They don't do as much as their counterparts, and he'd like to see them do more."
Menino wants BC to pay the city the $424,000 it will lose in taxes from the Commonwealth Avenue property, as well as additional community benefits "to moderate the impact on the neighborhood," Joyce said.

Boston College, whose campus is split between Newton and Boston, pays the City of Boston $261,000 annually, a total that trails some other colleges in Boston. Boston University pays $4.6 million, and an additional $3.5 million in property taxes, while Harvard pays $1.8 million a year for its Boston facilities, city officials said.
Boston College officials today said they were willing to discuss the mayor's request as the city review of the expansion plan moves forward. "Boston College is happy to have discussions with the mayor on these matters and looks forward to doing so," said college spokesman Jack Dunn. Dunn said such discussions would probably take place later this summer, when the college and city negotiate a community benefits package around the proposed expansion.

Dunn defended the college's level of community support, saying the college provides more than $5 million worth of community service to Boston and Newton.
"In terms of community benefits, Boston College is among the most generous colleges and universities in the city," Dunn said. Dunn added that the mayor "has a friend in Boston College," and that reports of tensions between the two sides were "overblown."
The growing friction between the college and Menino is more than political posturing. BC's plan, which it describes as critical to its future, needs the approval of the Boston Redevelopment Authority, whose board is stacked with Menino appointees.
Menino has also expressed frustration over the college's recent efforts to have alumni contact city officials and state representatives to register their support for the expansion. Menino said the lobbying efforts were premature because the plan was only recently filed for official city review.

Most colleges reimburse their host communities for the cost of municipal services and for lost tax revenue on their property, often vast amounts of valuable land. In Boston, colleges typically provide additional community benefit packages in negotiations over their expansion plans.
Earlier this year, for example, Harvard, which is proposing a $1 billion science center in Allston, agreed to pay $24 million in community benefits.
Newton Mayor David Cohen recently announced that he plans to approach BC officials about increasing their payments, now $100,000 a year. Jeremy Solomon, director of policy and communications for the city, said the city's fiscal struggles following the rejection of a $12 million tax measure are prompting the move.
"It's clear we need to explore every revenue opportunity out there," he said, noting that the payments had not increased in a decade. The college does contribute to Newton in a variety of indirect ways, such as community service and free courses for city employees, Solomon added. BC's long-range expansion plan includes four new academic buildings in Newton.

Earlier this year, legislators asked state finance officials to study a plan that would impose a 2.5 percent annual assessment on colleges with endowments exceeding $1 billion. Supporters said deep-pocketed colleges were not giving enough of their tax-free fortunes back to the community.

College officials say the addition of housing for almost 1,300 students, including new dormitories on its Brighton campus across Commonwealth Avenue, will dramatically reduce neighborhood complaints over disruptive students. The college also plans to restrict undergraduates from renting apartments in one- or two-family houses in Allston-Brighton and Newton.
Neighbors strongly prefer that Boston College restrict new dormitories to its main campus, but many are thrilled by the college's campaign to provide university housing for all its undergraduates. Additional dorms, they hope, will cut down on the number of students living off-campus, whom they blame for many loud, late-night parties.

LINK
 
Re: Boston College Master Plan debut

Saw that one coming. The city doesn't want to lose that property tax revenue, understandably so. BC will have to pay up front before it can have what it wants, which I think they will get for the most part.
 
Re: Boston College Master Plan debut

Now I understand the Mayor's concern; up until this article, I didn't understand why he was against BC's purchase.

And, I love this quote in the Globe:

Tim Burke, a member of a task force reviewing BC's plan, said he supported the mayor's push.

"There's too much tax-free land in the city already," he said. "It's not fair to the neighbors. We're picking up the cost."
 
Re: Boston College Master Plan debut

The mayor talks out of both sides on his mouth. On one hand, he's slapping BC around for taking a building off the tax rolls (and a few hundred kids out of the neighborhoods) yet he's proposing to build a new city hall on prime waterfront real estate, thus effectively taking that property off the tax rolls. It's ok for the mayor but not ok for BC. Doesn't he realize how hypocritical he comes off?
 
Re: Boston College Master Plan debut

^^ To be fair, The GC land would be privatized adding all that land to the tax rolls.
 
Re: Boston College Master Plan debut

You're correct and I'd agree with you about the Government Center land if the mayor proposed to build on a piece of property that didn't have the potential for high end private development that the waterfront parcel has. At this point, with the economy the way it is, he'd be better off to redo city hall to make it more people friendly and sell the plaza to private developers.
 
Re: Boston College Master Plan debut

^^Agreed.

But back on topic whatever land BC buys in Boston, they should pay a corresponding uptick in PILOT 'fees'.
 
Re: Boston College Master Plan debut

I don't want to hear anyone that disagrees with the mayor ever complain about the city not fixing this street or that sidewalk or not having what NYC or any other city has. These things require money and the taxpayers are not an ATM machine.
 
Re: Boston College Master Plan debut

http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2008/04/30/city_offers_bank_4m_tax_break_to_relocate/

Tax incentives given to "for profit" institutions to remain in the city also take away from the city's coffers. IMO, the billions and billions that the area universities and colleges pump into the local economy more than make up for the lack of property taxes that they don't pay. If the neighbors would let BC build their dorms on their own property maybe BC wouldn't have bought that building on Comm Ave to use as dorms.
 
Re: Boston College Master Plan debut

BC cites legacy of Newton dorms

By Andreae Downs
Globe Correspondent / August 10, 2008

Brighton, meet Newton.

At least that's what Boston College wants in the ongoing struggle over its expansion in Brighton. The residents there almost unanimously oppose BC's plan to construct two undergraduate dormitories on the former Boston Archdiocese land north of Commonwealth Avenue, and to use a recently purchased apartment building about three blocks away as a dorm.

The neighbors argue that students on this so-called Brighton Campus and in the apartments are bound to act more or less the way they now do in privately controlled housing - with loud music, parties, litter, and large groups wandering around late at night.

As BC's expansion proposal has wound through the approval process, officials have been trying to allay those fears by pointing to the other side of the campus. Nestled among Newton's trees and Tudors, there are 875 freshman beds at the Boston College Law School Campus on Centre Street, and 1,700 freshman and sophomore beds on the Upper Campus at Beacon Street and Tudor Road.

"BC has thousands of students living in close proximity to neighbors on our campuses in Newton without incident for decades," said school spokesman Jack Dunn.

Ask the leaders of Newton's government and neighborhood associations, and you get the same picture.

"We hear very few complaints about the Newton dorms, and they directly abut private residences," said Ruthanne Fuller, president of the Chestnut Hill Association. "Dorms just do not have the same set of problems private houses do" when they are rented out to students.

"There may be difficulties, but I don't know of them," said Alderman Lisle Baker, adding, "I don't want to say something so kind about BC that it will make the Brighton folks say, 'If they are so great, you take them.' "

That's pretty much what Brighton resident Lisa Lieberman said when told of Newton's experience.

For 32 years, Lieberman has owned a home on Kirkland Road, where BC students have been renting private residences. "It has been so unpleasant the last few years," she said.

Fuller said she understood why Brighton residents might be nervous about getting dorms in the neighborhood, since Brighton has more students living in private homes, as well as groups walking through neighborhoods to reach the bars and restaurants in Cleveland Circle, but noted that in Newton, "We don't have that issue."

Little resident opposition has materialized around BC's proposal to add more dorms to the Newton campus in the next 10 to 20 years, and most of that has to do with the lack of setback or trees between the buildings and Beacon Street, Fuller said.

Boston College has proposed housing 500 students in two dorms on its Brighton Campus. Another 220 new dorm beds are proposed for the central campus in Chestnut Hill, south of Commonwealth Avenue.

With the purchase of 2000 Commonwealth Ave., a 17-story apartment building three blocks from the Brighton Campus, which BC officials say could house another 564 students, the university's expansion plan would accommodate all of the 1,270 undergraduate students who have been living in private rentals in the neighborhood.

The Boston Redevelopment Authority is collecting public comments through Aug. 22, and staffers will then recommend whether to proceed with existing plans or suggest changes, said Jessica Shumaker, the BRA's senior spokeswoman.

Residents and Mayor Thomas Menino have voiced objections to BC's Commonwealth Avenue acquisition. But Dunn noted that the building already houses 196 BC undergrads, an arrangement underscored by the regular BC shuttle-bus stop there. Most of the remaining apartments are also occupied by students or recent graduates, Dunn said.

Converting the building into a dorm "would just allow the building to go from unsupervised student housing to supervised," he said.

Lieberman seemed to be more concerned with the loss of tax revenue from the university's purchase of the 188-unit building. Because it is an educational institution, BC could remove the building from the city's tax rolls.

"It's just outrageous," she said.

Comments on BC's plans can be e-mailed to john.fitzgerald.bra@cityofboston.gov, or mailed to John Fitzgerald, Boston Redevelopment Authority, 1 City Hall Square, Boston, MA 02201.

Link
 
Re: Boston College Master Plan debut

This is the sort of story that BC should have put out there at the beginning, as the experience of abuttors and neighbors on the other side of the campus seems generally positive.

Being more pro-active with the story would also have lessened the ability of opponents being able to dominate the headlines with their complaints, concerns, and fears.
 
Last edited:
Re: Boston College Master Plan debut

CITY WEEKLY LETTERS

BC housing plan has wide backing

August 17, 2008

Your Aug. 10 article "BC cites legacy of Newton dorms" gave the misleading impression that Brighton residents are virtually unanimous in opposing Boston College's housing plan. This is not true and it begs for correction.

As a longtime community activist in Brighton who knows the neighborhood quite well, I can attest that the vast majority of residents, especially those affected by BC student rentals, are relieved and grateful that BC is finally taking the responsibility for housing their students (100 percent within 10 years). This is long overdue, and definitely good news for Brighton.

Your reporter's impression that the locals are unhappy was based on her observation of a few, mostly poorly attended public meetings, where some individuals, who fear that new dorms may be a source of problems, voiced their opposition. However, those fears are purely speculative, and cannot be supported by any evidence (as your article indirectly confirms by citing the generally positive experience with BC dorms in Newton).

One needs to remember that light attendance in meetings usually indicates that residents either do not strongly object to, or even support, the proposal that's on the table, though often with caveats.

Anyone who has ever wished for a better, homeowner-friendly Brighton understands that BC's housing plan is a step in the right direction. The remaining concerns (dorms' size and design, fair distribution of beds, and proper oversight of students) will no doubt be worked out during the City of Boston project review process.

Eva M. Webster
Brighton

http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2008/08/17/bc_housing_plan_has_wide_backing/
 
Re: Boston College Master Plan debut

^ A level-headed letter, Eva.
 
Re: Boston College Master Plan debut

^ A level-headed letter, Eva.

She's on a roll.

Perspective: BC?s dorm plan not so bad
By Eva Webster, Guest Columnist
Thu Aug 21, 2008, 07:48 AM EDT

Allston-Brighton -

If there is anything humorous that one can find in the controversy over Boston College controversy, it is the apparent shock that BC inflicted on Brighton residents by announcing its intent to house all of its undergraduate students. Not only that, BC also wants to have dorms on the property it owns, and according to a plan that works for the college. Imagine.

The earth-shattering revelation came about after years of community complaints about the negative impacts of student rentals. For as long as we could all disapprove of BC doing all that injustice to Brighton, the community was a picture of unity. Then, the sudden prospect of losing the number-one reason to pick on BC, has sent us into a tailspin. The life as we know it would be no more. Brighton folks are not going into the era of peaceful nights quietly.

Emotionally, most people find it hard to embrace change that is thrust upon them by forces they cannot control. That may be the real reason for some individuals? opposition to dorms on the Brighton Campus, especially since those dorms are in fact reasonably buffered from people?s homes and proposed to be only four stories tall. Additionally, an earlier argument that students from those dorms would be frequenting off-campus parties in the nearby neighborhood no longer stands.

No one has been able to present a strong, cohesive argument as to why having 6 percent of all BC dorm beds on the Brighton Campus would be a problem. Is it that the students would walk on Comm. Ave., Lake and Foster streets? If students want to walk to Brighton Center, Oak Square or Cleveland Circle, they will walk those same streets even if they all live in dorms in the ?mods? area (which that site, it turns out, cannot accommodate).

Without being too callous about it, I think that people who are troubled by the idea of students using public streets (in a civilized way, just like any other area residents) should not live close to a major college. It is analogous to someone living close to an active cemetery, and being irked by funerals.

The acquisition of 2000 Commonwealth Ave. was upsetting to immediate neighbors who got caught off guard. However, according to some estimates, 40 percent of that building was already occupied by BC students (with no complaints from the abutters) ? so why assume that things will change drastically for worse when BC residential life managers and BC Police have the ability to effectively manage and oversee the entire building?

Dorms proposed for Shea Field are not good news for the Chestnut Hill Reservoir either, but one cannot argue in favor of Brighton Campus dorms, while flatly opposing any housing on Shea Field ? and vice versa. In both cases, the devil is in the design and mitigation details.

One thing is for sure: it would be extremely unfair to spare one of those locations from dorms, at the expense of overburdening the other. A fair distribution of beds should be BC?s, the BRA?s and the community?s goal.

There is no proof whatsoever ? only unfounded, exaggerated fears that have been snowballing in some heads ? that Brighton Campus dorms, as proposed, will be a source of any significant disruption to Brighton residents. It has not been the case in Newton where BC dorms are located very close to multimillion-dollar residences.

The concern about noise that groups of inebriated students may make while walking through the neighborhood late at night is legitimate ? but that is a function of their access to local bars, not where they live. With Boston College being where it is, can anyone expect that BC students should be using some other neighborhoods? streets while walking home? Maybe BC students should be barred from living on BC?s property. That?s an idea!

The truth of the matter is that BC housing its students in dorms vastly improves the chances that any potential late-night antics will be nipped in the bud by BC Police. Their cruisers (as well as patrolmen on foot or on bicycles) can effectively monitor the few streets leading to the dorms ? something that Boston Police cannot do on numerous small streets that currently have BC student rentals.

Dorms are places where BC has the ability to exercise full control over its students ? unlike in the many private rentals that unsupervised BC juniors now occupy in Brighton, where ?anything goes.? The latter is an intolerable situation that is highly detrimental to Brighton?s reputation and attractiveness as a place to live.

Understandably, learning that undergraduate dormitories are to spring up within easy walking distance from some homes is troubling to some people. But any rational person would also admit that living close to a noisy commercial area with drinking establishments, for example, or along a congested, loud transportation corridor, is a far worse predicament than having an elegantly maintained, mostly suburban in character, Boston College campus (even with all its well-monitored residence halls) nearby.

Those who are denying BC?s right to build dormitories where BC decided they want to build them, are ? knowingly or not ? sabotaging the goal of having 100 percent students housed by BC. BC cannot exceedingly acceptable levels of density on its Lower Campus just to give in to neighbors? demands.

Why should BC be cramming its Lower Campus with thousands of beds now that they own substantially more acreage than before, which gives them the opportunity to design a beautiful, well-scaled mixed-use campus that feels more spacious? Any property owner, including an institution, thinks of its own interests and needs when planning how to use its land. To expect that BC should develop its campus by foregoing its own needs solely to please its neighbors is immature and unrealistic. None of us would do it if the shoe was on the other foot.

Most importantly, how can we expect BC to look at things from our perspective, when we seem incapable of looking at things from their perspective? This needs to be a two-way street.

If you make an effort to look at things from BC?s point of view, it is easy to see why BC does not want to crowd the Lower Campus. That area will be heavily used due to the presence of the big new RecPlex and the University Center, both of which need to be centrally located to facilitate their daily use by thousands of students.

BC needs some centrally located open space in the ?mods? area in order to accommodate outdoor gatherings and celebrations that accompany big football games, campus events, etc. If BC were to fully develop that area, those outdoor football-related celebrations would likely move to Shea Field on the edge of the Reservoir, which is the biggest public open space treasure that Brighton has. The Reservoir Park?s serenity should be protected at any cost for the sake of the entire larger neighborhood.

I share the view of those who think that BC should refrain from buying houses in Brighton ? because it essentially shrinks our neighborhood ? but we should all applaud BC?s effort to house all of their students, and work with the college on proper design and mitigation.


Eva Webster is a Brighton activist associated with Chestnut Hill Reservoir Coalition and Aberdeen-Brighton Residents Association.

http://www.wickedlocal.com/allston/...3542080/Perspective-BC-s-dorm-plan-not-so-bad

perhaps this is why Pahre has been reluctant to update his blog.
 
Re: Boston College Master Plan debut

Found this on Boston.com:
http://www.boston.com/news/local/breaking_news/2008/09/neighborhood_gr.html

Task force presses city on BC expansion plan
September 9, 2008 02:50 PM
By Peter Schworm, Globe staff

A community task force reviewing Boston College's proposed expansion is urging city officials to seek "substantial modifications" to the plan and require a 10-year moratorium on expansion into the Allston-Brighton neighborhood.

In a strongly worded 17-page letter received Monday, the Allston-Brighton advisory group cited a range of concerns about the $1 billion campaign's impact on the neighborhood. It voiced opposition to the university's plan to build dormitories for 500 undergraduates on its Brighton campus, the former headquarters of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Boston.

Instead, it urged the college to house those students on the college's main Chestnut Hill campus and called for a 10-year moratorium on expansion to "safeguard Allston-Brighton's residential character." The panel asked city officials to deny the college a permit to convert a high-rise apartment complex near its campus on Commonwealth Avenue into a dormitory unless it accepted the conditions.

The panel also criticized the college for not being "fully responsive to Task Force and community concerns," and urged city officials to "respect those concerns by holding BC accountable."

College officials were reviewing the letter and could not immediately comment.

The 12-member task force was appointed by Boston Mayor Thomas M. Menino and carries significant influence over city decisions on college expansions. As a result, its critical stance likely puts pressure on the college to adjust its proposal to neigborhood concerns.

This summer, Menino said he opposed BC's plans for the off-campus dormitory, which would house 560 students, and urged the college to make room for students on its main campus.

College officials view the expansion as critical to its long-term success, and say they cannot reach their goal of guaranteeing undergraduates four years of campus housing without new dormitories in Brighton and on Commonwealth Avenue. In June, the college announced plans to build new dormitories for nearly 1,300 students to quell neighborhood complaints about unruly students.

BC now houses about 85 percent of undergraduates on campus, and neighbors frequently complain about disruptions caused by students who live in the neighborhoods.
 
Last edited:
Re: Boston College Master Plan debut

I think that BC will not increase the number of beds it has planned for lower campus. The campus is already saturated with students. In the event that BC is rejected the right to build dorms on Brighton campus (with a lawsuit sure to follow--just as happened in Newton, where BC won), then i see BC abandoning its 100% goal until they are allowed to build on Brighton. High rises on lower campus are simply not an option BC is willing to consider.

Also, as has been said by many people in this thread, i think the demands of these people are rediculous. 100% on campus, just not on the 65 ACRES next to my house, or the apartment building which is already 60% students!!

Also note: I am a BC student, so I definitely have a bias.
 
Re: Boston College Master Plan debut

I don't know why BC doesn't re-position the proposed dorms on the former Archdiocesan land to be right on Comm Ave, where the only people to be disturbed are the dead in the cemetery across the street. The other question is that if the community is now accepting converting the Allston apt. building into a 560 bed dorm, how many beds does BC now have to build on the Archdiocesan property to meet its housing goal. As I recall the draft IMP, the new 560 bed dorm was not part of the overall housing scheme.

Changes urged on BC plan to expand
Task force fears possible impact on Allston-Brighton

By Peter Schworm, Globe Staff | September 10, 2008

A community task force reviewing Boston College's proposed expansion is urging city officials to seek "substantial modifications" to the plan and require a 10-year moratorium on further development by the college in the Allston-Brighton neighborhood.

In a strongly worded 17-page letter received by city officials Monday, the Allston-Brighton advisory group cited a range of concerns about the impact of the $1 billion campaign on the neighborhood.

Reflecting the consensus among neighbors, the group voiced strong opposition to the university's plan to build dormitories for 500 undergraduates on BC's Brighton campus, the former headquarters of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Boston.

Instead, it wants the college to house those students on its main Chestnut Hill campus, and called for the moratorium to "safeguard Allston-Brighton's residential character." The panel asked city officials to deny the college a permit to convert a high-rise apartment complex near its campus on Commonwealth Avenue into a dormitory unless it accepted the conditions.

The 12-member panel also criticized the college for not being "fully responsive to Task Force and community concerns," and urged city officials to "respect those concerns by holding BC accountable."

Such task forces, appointed by Mayor Thomas M. Menino, carry significant influence over city decisions on college expansions.

This summer, Menino said he squarely opposed BC's plans for the Brighton and off-campus dormitories, and urged the college to make room for students on its main campus.

College officials view the expansion as critical to its future, and say they cannot reach their goal of guaranteeing undergraduates four years of campus housing without building dormitories beyond its traditional Chestnut Hill campus. In June, BC announced plans to add student housing for nearly 1,300 students to ease neighborhood complaints about unruly students who live off-campus.

The college now houses about 85 percent of undergraduates on campus.
A BC spokesman declined to comment, saying college officials were still reviewing the task force's comments.

In its letter, the task force said it strongly supported the college's goal of housing all its undergraduates and supported the plan to turn the apartment complex into a 560-student dormitory. But the panel criticized the college for not consulting with members before the purchase, and called for "an unprecedented level of college supervision" over students living there.

Tim Schofield, a task force member, said members believed their support of the off-campus dorm marked a significant concession that should persuade the college to withdraw its plans for the Brighton dorms. Many neighbors dispute the college's contention that it cannot build more dorms on the main campus.

Schofield said, however, that many residents are pleased the university has pledged to house all its students on campus.

They believe that keeping students on campus will help attract more homeowners to the area, stabilizing the neighborhood with an influx of families.

"A lot of the problem is reputation," he said. "People think there are students everywhere."

The college has said the off-campus dormitory would be overseen like other housing facilities, staffed by resident assistants and a priest.

The Boston Redevelopment Authority, which oversees college developments, will review the project in the coming weeks. It will either send the proposal to a vote or ask the college to modify the plan.


http://www.boston.com/news/education/higher/articles/2008/09/10/changes_urged_on_bc_plan_to_expand/
 
Re: Boston College Master Plan debut

Letter: BC should house students on main campus

Wed Sep 10, 2008, 10:12 AM EDT

Allston-Brighton -

In solidarity with our neighbors in Cleveland Circle and the Foster Street area, many of us have supported the call for BC to house 100 percent of their students on their main campus. We understand and sympathize with our friends as they cope with vandalism, disrespectful transient tenants and absentee landlords who squeeze maximum profit from unkempt homes. We continue to stand firmly with our neighbors.

Without seriously studying options, BC has represented that they are unable to house all of their students without building on the former St. John?s seminary, now called BC?s ?Brighton Campus.? The implied threat is that their students will continue to terrorize the neighborhood if they cannot build dorms next to our homes. Holding this knife to the community?s throat, the university is capitalizing on student misbehavior as a means of pitting us neighbor against neighbor and getting everything it wants.

It must be said that not all of the problem neighbors attend BC, nor are they all students. ?Problem houses? are also rented by students from other colleges. A significant portion of Allston-Brighton?s population is made up of recent grads who may wear a suit and tie during the day, but who can still expertly tap a keg on any given evening. We can?t pin all of the blame on Boston College students or solely on students.

There is no shortage of people seeking cheap, shared rent by living in cramped, often unbearable (but legal) conditions. New tenants replacing the departed BC students may not expect, or may not be in a position to ask for, some modicum of upkeep, but the absentee landlords will be happy to take their money.

The solution for Allston-Brighton is complicated and requires a broad strategy involving many issues. There?s no magic bullet, and it certainly isn?t in Boston College?s Master Plan. That being said, I believe that housing the students on the main campus is a good start for this process.

Boston College dorms and the baseball and softball stadiums on the Brighton Campus do give us guarantees, however. They will severely disrupt the families and long-term residents nearby. New tenants will move into the former BC student houses. The influx of families and young homeowners moving into Allston-Brighton will come to a dead stop, and Boston College will have a precedent for building more dorms in the former St. John?s seminary the next time they break their word to Allston-Brighton.

Alex Selvig
Brighton

LINK
 
Re: Boston College Master Plan debut

I'm surprised and somewhat pleased that the neighborhood association at least offered a compromise. Let the college buy the apartment building (which should be its right, after all) but persuade them to not build the new dorm in Allston-Brighton.

I know nothing of the campus, but if BC doesn't care either way, let Newton take the new dorm, and everyone goes away happy.
 

Back
Top