That’s the big question, right? When they acquired the archdiocese land, they also started a new religious grad school covering both lay minister and Jesuit training. BC‘s done a whole bunch of stuff to that campus so far and has more things on its current master plan. But none of them (except for religious archive expansion of the library) directly impact the actual academic portion of that school. Classes are held at Simboli, St. Clement’s, 3 Lake street — all of which pre-existed and have had just minor renovations.
In the Messina college case, Pine Manor already had 3 academic buildings plus a library, and dorms to house 200-300 people. And the school is opening in a month. Given their enrollment is 200 students, I doubt they need anything significantly more just to run that operation. If they needed more, they would have done it by now.
Similarly Mt. Alvernia had a big high school building already, which can easily be adapted to classrooms if they want. But no BC programs are currently on that space.
The answer really comes down to: how do they plan to use these properties, or in Brookline’s case, do they want to do anything beyond Messina college? And frankly I think that’s part of the reason for the delayed new IMP — BC told BDPA last summer that the new master plan would be ready by end of 2023, then told them in October it would be end of March 2024, and here we are in June still without it. They’re probably still figuring out their plans on using these lands, and now have a search for a new President who will want to have some say in the new IMP. My guess is BC just sits on these properties for a few years, and will work through the current IMP with projects they know won’t change under a new IMP (apparently the archives and Newton plex projects), and we won’t see the new IMP that incorporates all of the new properties until end of 2026. Hope I’m wrong on that and they’re closer to completion, I’m definitely very curious about their plans for the future.