I think Umass bought Mt IdaSince when did BC acquire Mt. Ida? And, Messina is on the former Pine Manor campus, not Mt. Ida.
I think Umass bought Mt IdaSince when did BC acquire Mt. Ida? And, Messina is on the former Pine Manor campus, not Mt. Ida.
right here, but considering the mess Pine Manor was in before BC bought it, it's possible Mt. Ida had a satellite campusSince when did BC acquire Mt. Ida? And, Messina is on the former Pine Manor campus, not Mt. Ida.
They didn't. My big error.Since when did BC acquire Mt. Ida? And, Messina is on the former Pine Manor campus, not Mt. Ida.
They're both on Newton Campus. Law school renovation, and replacement for the athletic hut by the fields.I cannot find the locations of projects numbered 500 and 501. Smith wing is part of the law school.
Thanks for this. Current sketch of the new archives building is slightly nicer than last year’s sketches.Hidden in the 7/12/24 Catholic Religious Archives Amendment:
"The University is currently in the planning process for the renovation of the former Mt. Alvernia High School and the relocation of BC's graduate school of social work on the Newton East Campus."
Wonder if that leaves McGuinn open for future demo or renovation... Hopefully the former.
BC’s middle campus architecture just reflects its history as an institution. When it was truly just a local college, they built slowly but very nicely for what they needed - that got Gasson, St. Mary’s, Devlin and Bapst. But it took all their resources to get it (they had planned to build a church and gymnasium at the same time on Linden Lane, but they badly miscalculated the money they raised and could only build those 4, then the Great Depression hit). That’s all they had there from 1913 through 1945 (plus the playing fields), but they really didn’t need more than that. After WWII their enrollment skyrocketed and they had added the business, education, law and nursing schools, and they literally ran out of room for classes. With an exponential increase in students they needed an exponential increase in buildings, so built on the cheap over a 25 year period to accomplish it — and it still almost bankrupted them!McGuinn is bad but somehow is an improvement over Carney and McElroy. If those two are not going down then why would McGuinn? BC has made some good choices regarding campus construction -- and some god-awful ones. Why students and the BC community have to be continuously subjected to the outright ugliness of certain buildings, especially when contrasted against some very fine ones is beyond my understanding in light of BC's ample resources. "Oxford on the Hill" indeed!