BPDA Austin Street Parking Lot Development | Charlestown

New documents posted:

IMG_2603.jpeg



New draft masterplan

New draft development plan
 
Last edited:
Thanks!

OLD
1747411900690.png



NEW - lots of added pavement and unnecessary rotary... why even bother with the "Middle Road" with the multiple cut-thrus? I do like the new form of the protected courtyards and better frontage on Rutherford.
1747411958105.png


Phase 1 is the shortest building at only 7 stories - will that even be taller than the highway?
1747412372924.png
 
The residents of Charlestown who live right next to it. It also separates a good chunk of Charlestown from the main section...
The city of Boston should have moved Rutherford Ave over to run alongside I-93 from City Square to Sullivan Square decades ago. It's too late now with all the development along the corridor.
 
How does this development impact the Rutherford realignment plan? The major roadway is still directly next to those fields, and the greenspace is provided on the other side of the road.
1747426157936.png
 
The fields will be unusable due to air quality and nobody will cross Rutherford even with the “road diet” that doesn’t actually fix the road.
 
The fields will be unusable due to air quality and nobody will cross Rutherford even with the “road diet” that doesn’t actually fix the road.
It's interesting to compare this project to the Dot Ave rezoning projects, where they're planning parks along interior streets surrounded by towers of res/commercial and not putting them directly on Dot Ave. And Dot Ave is much less busy.
 
The fields will be unusable due to air quality and nobody will cross Rutherford even with the “road diet” that doesn’t actually fix the road.

They'll probably get used, but it will have a health impact. A lot of people really don't understand how bad air quality and particulate matter is that close to a highway (including me just a decade ago)! Plenty of people use the skatepark in Cambridge under 93, as well as the soccer field right by the EF building, which is only a couple hundred feet from the highway.
 
Last edited:
Shouldnt we have something related to BHCC here or at least something more special at a major gateway site to the city other than more usual turgid slapped-up residential schlock?
 
In its six decades off the industrial edge of Charlestown’s Rutherford Avenue, the giant Boston Sand & Gravel complex has never had a neighbor. Now, 705 apartments might go in on some empty parking lots next door. The industrial stalwart is pushing back, worried that its massive trucks and all those people could make for a bad mix.
[...]
In this case, there’s an access road between New Rutherford Ave. and Boston Sand & Gravel’s complex nestled beneath Interstate 93 and the flyovers to Route 1. At its busiest times, as many as 890 trucks a day use the road, hauling concrete, sand, and other heavy materials from the sprawling facility to construction sites all over Greater Boston.
On its way out to New Rutherford, the access road cuts between two city-owned parking lots, which cover 5.1 acres in all. Today they’re mainly used as student and staff parking for Bunker Hill Community College, but affordable housing developer Trinity Financial is planning to build 705 apartments there. They’ve even agreed to bring a branch of the YMCA to the site, and the Boston Planning and Development Agency board is scheduled to vote on the $500 million project’s master plan and first phase on Thursday.
Sand & Gravel has concerns. Its trucks are heavy and slow to stop. A redi-mix truck can weigh 77,000 pounds, while a semi truck can weigh 99,000 pounds. Putting those in close proximity to so many people is asking for trouble, wrote company president Dean M. Boylan, in a recent letter to state environmental regulators who are reviewing the project, and will “cause irreparable harm to BSG operations.”
 
You would have to be a loon to want to live in this traffic island.
 
I suspect the existing parking lots generate more pedestrian crossings of that access road than the apartments would. But as the developer points out in the article, the structures will be inward facing, and likely limiting pedestrian usage of that street anyway.
 
Arguably, this proposal is more attractive than Hub 25. As you note, they are extremely similar locations, sandwiched between an Interstate and a high speed stroad, adjacent to a T station, etc., but the Charlestown location is an easy, even attractive walk to downtown, whereas the Dorchester/UMass location is definitely not.
 

Back
Top