Re: Brookline Place
I wonder how much extra that thoughtful façade cost vs a more basic design.
To expand: Assuming this design is more expensive, why did the developer agree to the extra expense and risk? Whim? Ego? And more importantly, why did the lender agree to front the money on a seemingly wasteful façade? Maybe it was self-funded? Maybe there was an ROI argument to be made for the extra expense. If so, maybe that argument can be made for other projects in the Boston area and we can start seeing more quality designs like this one.
OR maybe it didn't really cost that much more and the designer/architect was given a little more freedom in his design.
Either way I think there is a lot to learn for this project and would probably make a nice example and case study.