Re: Congress St Garage is being sold.
It's just lazy reporting... all Boston reporters keep this template on file:
Headline:
(Name of city project) has residents concerned
Sub-headline:
Project will cast shadows on (beloved park/monument/museum/sidewalk along the water)
Body:
(Developer) proposal to build a soaring tower of X stories at the (site) has local residents concerned it could alter the character and historic nature of their neighborhoods. The property will soar above the (beloved park/monument/museum/sidewalk along the water), casting shadows and creating windy conditions.
If near the water, they fish out a quote such as: Vivien Li, unelected person representative of nobody in Greater Boston except her own special interests, said "NO NO NO NO!!! NO!!!! YOU CAN'T" and other reasonable things.
Alt. quote, if not near the water and you need a land-based perspective: Shirley Kressel, unelected person representative of nobody in Greater Boston except her own special interests, said "NO NO NO NO!!! NO!!!! YOU CAN'T" and other reasonable things.
The developer defended themselves (developer doesn't get first say in these articles, the angries always get first say, so the developers are always playing defense) "this project makes total sense because....."
And finally, a politician who could care less "Well, we share the concerns of both the activists and the developers, it's a complicated situation and we want to make sure that gas prices are low and the boys from Iraq come home safely"
---
And then nothing gets built except an ugly squat boxes like at Jacob Wirth's, One Charles, Fan Pier, Seaport Square, Park Lane, WTC, the ICA, the Mandarin Oriental, the whole Bulfinch Triangle: Avenir, The Merano, Greenway Place, etc.
I don't mean to pick on Ms. Li or Ms. Kressel, it's not an indictment against them at all, it's an indictment against reporters who give these far-out-there fringe activists a voice in the newspaper.
Inevitably, the lazy reporter just picks up the phone, calls one of them knowing he/she will be able to easily get the generic, anti-growth, anti-progress point of view without actually having to report on it.
It would be nice and refreshing to see an article that says "people interviewed on the streets in front of the site all largely support this project. The only people at the BRA meeting to speak out against it is the small handful of anti-growth suspects that attend every meeting to fight all progress in this city" and just leave it at that. Why quote them? It gives them a voice that they really haven't earned.