Bulfinch Crossing | Congress Street Garage | West End

Re: Gov't Center Garage Redevelopment

On May 27th which is their next meeting, they'll be putting their their model and variations into the BRA city scale model. Sort of interesting. Got it in an e-mail from one of the people associated with the project.
 
Re: Gov't Center Garage Redevelopment

PaulC, Shirley Kressel, and I were there last night. There was a predictably dispiriting consensus on the part of the community panelists about height, shadows, density, traffic, construction mitigation, and so on...

I made a few comments toward the end of the meeting that some on the panel may have found "controversial."

Was Shirley the one who asked to see what the project would look like if they weren't breaking the law.
 
Re: Gov't Center Garage Redevelopment

Hmmmm, that's an interesting statement. What did that person mean exactly?

Also, could people who attended possibly give some more in-depth details? For example, despite the usual flood of selfish responses and protests, did it actually seem as if Raymond will be going through with the master plan?
 
Re: Gov't Center Garage Redevelopment

Was Shirley the one who asked to see what the project would look like if they weren't breaking the law.

Indeed. Briv, itchy, CommuterGuy and I met her during the SC&L debacle. Shirley's really interesting and astonishingly knowledgeable about the BRA's misdeeds. She and I agree on more than we disagree on. I'll introduce you at the next meeting if you like.

The context for her question was that the existing building envelope represents what Raymond can "legally" construct on the site. There are three processes (Planned Development Area, Zoning Variance, and Urban Renewal Project) that could allow Raymond to go forward as proposed.

Raymond and his team are correct to refer to this as a "proposal" rather than a "plan."

Also, could people who attended possibly give some more in-depth details?

The meeting was sponsored by the BRA and moderated by Kristin Kara.

The Panel consisted of members from community groups from the North End, Beacon Hill, and the West End.

After Raymond's presentation, each panelist spoke for a few moments, addressing concerns about height, shadows, density, traffic, construction mitigation, and so on. There is recognition that removing the garage and replacing it with a mix of uses can benefit the abutting communities.

Kristin Kara opened the floor to the audience. In general, the comments from the floor were consistent with the concerns of the panelists. A comment from one of the panelists is a good summation: "Is the medicine worse than the disease?"

Then I got to speak. I identified myself as an East Boston resident with no stake in the proposal other than that of any other Boston taxpayer. I endorsed Raymond's efforts to reach out proactively, and praised his efforts to think big at this location.

Than I turned to the panel. I debunked some of their assumptions that smaller buildings reducing wind, and lightly chastised a woman from the North End who asserted that the project offers "no value" to her neighborhood. Taxes will be collected on every square foot of this proposed development; those taxes fund schools, police, fire, EMS, and other city services. Isn't that a value?

I closed with this thought: I live less than a half-mile from the end of two active runways. I choose to live there, recognizing that I often see, hear, and smell one of America's busiest airports. Is it unreasonable to suggest that people who choose to live in urban neighborhoods close to downtown may need to share the city with a few tall buildings, and those who live and work in them?

I wonder if a rash of logic will break out...
 
Last edited:
Re: Gov't Center Garage Redevelopment

Way to go, did the panelists and/or the presenters respond? Not to bug you about keeping a box score or anything...haha.
 
Re: Gov't Center Garage Redevelopment

On May 27th which is their next meeting, they'll be putting their their model and variations into the BRA city scale model. Sort of interesting. Got it in an e-mail from one of the people associated with the project.

One member of the AIG commented on how great the developers team has been at meeting thier request. Someone asked of they could see the development model in relation to the cities the BRA's city model.

Only 8 of the 12 IAG members where there. When I walked into the room and saw the IAG I thought it was a casting call for a remake of the movie Cocoon(before the pods). I don't think anyone was under 60.

All but one seemed to like the project but all had reservations. Shadows, traffic and parking were the big concerns. Traffic will be the next meeting. More graphics will be produced for the next meeting including street names, a north arrow added to the view and shadow studies. It surprised me that people on a IAG could not pick out the major streets on an satellite photo. The developer even had stickers for people to place on a map so they can then develop more views. Surprisingly people were worried about the potential loss of parking. There was also a little frustration that there are two potential plans and they are seeing only the impact of one, although it's the bigger of the two.

One audience asked about wind and Benton Brut pointed out that this is an area of expertise for Cook+Fox.

There were a few politician, their aids or candidates there. I think is was mayoral candidate McCrea who asked if they would seek public funds and they answer was no. He also asked what their profit would be and they wouldn't answer. Does this clown ask the same question when he goes into a store or restaurant? If this is McCrea I'm not impressed.

The one IAG member against this project is the guy from Beacon Hill. He doesn't*want any construction so he is against the project.

Impact Advisory Group (IAG) Meeting #4
Topics: Height and Massing; MBTA Coordination
Wednesday, May 27, 6:00 pm
Boston City Hall, BRA Board Room, Room 900.
Note that the Plaza entrance to City Hall is locked after hours; to enter, please use the Congress Street entrance.

April 22, 2009 - Impact Advisory Group Meeting #3 PRESENTAION
http://www.demolishthegarage.com/pdf/presentations/pres_2009_04_22.pdf
 
Congress Street Towers

The New Green Monster
Cook + Fox-designed megaproject could mend a tear in Boston's urban fabric


A major Boston developer has proposed replacing one of Boston?s biggest eyesores with one of the largest, greenest developments in city history. The Raymond Property Company has filed a proposal with the city for One Congress Street, a four-million-square-foot office, residential, and retail development. The project would redefine the skyline, with two towers reaching 42 and 52 stories that rise from a series of smaller buildings intended to mask their scale. The developer selected Cook + Fox as designer from a shortlist of five notable firms.

If realized, One Congress will replace the Government Center Garage, a 150-foot-tall, two-football-field-long concrete bunker that spans Congress Street and slices the Haymarket area in two. Like its Brutalist neighbor City Hall, the garage was designed by Kallmann, McKinnell & Knowles.


We have been working with the community for months and are excited to kick off the official public review process,? said company chairman Ted Raymond. ?In the estimation of most people, the garage has outlived its appeal and today serves chiefly as an eyesore, a Berlin Wall that separates the Bulfinch Triangle and the West End from the North End and downtown.?

Rebecca Mattson, Raymond?s chief operating officer, said that choosing a team of world-class architects was of paramount importance. ?Boston doesn?t build that often, and Boston doesn?t build big that often, so we really wanted this to be something special.? Raymond?s selection process for the invited competition, initiated in December, was very direct: two firms were chosen for their high-rise expertise?SOM and Gensler?two for their iconic status?Foster + Partner and the Office for Metropolitan Architecture?and one for its ?cutting-edge work??Cook + Fox, whose Platinum LEED-seeking One Bryant Park Raymond especially admired.

Raymond has been developing in and around the neighborhood surrounding the garage for years, and so the developer spent months meeting with the community, seeking both public input and public favor. This led to a planning study with local firm Chan Krieger Sieniewicz that set rather strict guidelines for the five firms: the two towers, rising from a human-scale plinth, plus two smaller towers across Congress Street on scale with the plinth. Still, the results varied greatly, from Gensler's cellular volumes to OMA?s sardonically conventional boxes. ?We wanted someone who could do green, iconic, and buildable,? Mattson said. ?The question is, who can do those three best?" The answer proved to be Cook + Fox.

Principal Rick Cook said his firm's design casts an attentive eye toward its surroundings. The strands of each tower are arranged to avoid casting shadows to the Rose Kennedy Greenway while the terra cotta cladding of the plinths, which are filled with active retail and civic uses, are gestures to the brick vocabulary of the city, as well as home to some 2,000 mandatory parking spaces.

One side of the 52-story tower is cut exactly perpendicular to the sun for maximum photovoltaic penetration. "That's basically how the buildings were formed, by the environment," Cook said. The towers' undulating elevations also create varying plans from floor to floor, allowing for unique configurations in what are tentatively planned to be a pair of office towers, though one could be a hotel or apartment building, as the development climate will eventually dictate

Cook said that for him, the true appeal of the project was the way it would repair a longstanding rift in Boston's urban fabric. When the garage was completed in 1961, it was one of many barriers in the downtown landscape. Following the recent transformational success of the Big Dig, however, which buried the Central Artery and the elevated subway tracks, the garage is all that remains, looming over the neighborhood. "It's the last super-damaging artifact left from the downtown urban renewal of the 1970s," said Tim Love, a principal at UTILE, which is preparing a development study of the Greenway.

Raymond has set a tight deadline for the project. In January, the Environmental Protection Agency is set to move out of a two-story commercial addition that was built atop the garage in 1991, the garage's first vacancy in 20 years. Raymond has said that if it does not have most of its approvals in place, it will simply re-lease the space, since revenues from the parking spaces and office rents are considerable. (Raymond bought the garage in January 2007 for $243 million.)

Love said that, given the nature of Boston development, where every project is negotiated with the city on the basis of public benefit, it will be challenging but far from impossible for the project to get approved as proposed. ?It?s practically the perfect case study of Boston planning and development,? Love said. ?Basically, Raymond is asking, ?How much do you want this garage to go? What are you willing to give us to take it down?'"

The developer has a powerful ally on his side in the locals and civic groups who loath the garage. ?It draws the line on downtown, which is fine?unless you?re on the wrong side of the line,? said Bob O?Brien, executive director of the Downtown North Alliance, making clear where he and his beloved West End fall. "We've become terra incognita, the other side of the map." O'Brien, Love, and others said that in spite of the project's massive scale and scope, it has received generally favorable reviews from the public.

Assuming One Congress receives approval from the city, one thing the developer is not worried about is financing. Raymond has partnered with the Lewis Trust Group, a British real estate investment firm, and the National Electrical Benefit Fund, the pension fund of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, both of which have been thus far spared by the recession. ?It?s sheer dumb luck we picked them as partners, but thank God,? Mattson said.

Despite such the public and financial support, some politicians have objected, most notably Michael Flaherty, a city councilor running against four-term incumbent Mayor Thomas Menino. He has seized upon Raymond's proposal to include two adjacent parcels in the development, one occupied by a police station, which was recently refurbished for $5 million, and an NStar substation. Raymond conferred with both the city and NStar about its intentions, though no formal deals have been struck. Still, Flaherty has called it a sweetheart deal for the developer.

Politics aside, Peter Smith, principal of Global Urban Solutions and a co-chair of the Boston Society of Architect?s Urban Planning Committee, said that while much work remains to be done, he believes Raymond is headed in the right direction. ?They?ve got to work through it with all the stakeholders, dot all their ?i?s? and cross all their ?t?s?,? Smith said. ?But in that respect, they?re on the right track."

Matt Chaban

Photos can be seen here:
http://www.archpaper.com/e-board_rev.asp?News_ID=3268
 
Re: Gov't Center Garage Redevelopment

Overall, I think this is a great article since it's one of the few articles out there that are pro-development. This is especially good news:

Assuming One Congress receives approval from the city, one thing the developer is not worried about is financing. Raymond has partnered with the Lewis Trust Group, a British real estate investment firm, and the National Electrical Benefit Fund, the pension fund of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, both of which have been thus far spared by the recession. ?It?s sheer dumb luck we picked them as partners, but thank God,? Mattson said.

I don't see how anyone can bring up any legitimate argument against this project now. This is a very ambitious project which will destroy one of the biggest eyesores in this city. It will add life to a developing area and it has financing in place! They gotta get some shovels into the ground, ASAP!
 
Re: Gov't Center Garage Redevelopment

I love hearing this positive articles, and it gets me so excited about this project. But really, I keep telling myself not to get too excited. This is Boston, remember, it's hardly likely that the beautiful design selected will be fully realized. But we can hope.
 
Re: Gov't Center Garage Redevelopment

Looking at the sight plan again I fear for the smallest section of the new development, the part over the subway station, which is going to be surrounded by 6 lane highways on 2 sides and highway on/off ramps on the 3rd, not to mention the entrance/exit to the parking garage on the 4th side. It would go a long way to take out a lane or two for expanded sidewalks and bike lanes as well as making New Sudbury St two way.
 
Re: Gov't Center Garage Redevelopment

Agreed, Kennedy. This is one of the few recent proposals in Boston that could at all be referred to as "iconic." The pairing of location and developer here is unique, and has the potential to anchor an entire new nexus of activity within the central city. Downtown NEEDS this, in my opinion. 33 Arch and the State Street Building don't quite do it for me ;).
 
Re: Gov't Center Garage Redevelopment

Yeah, this is the type of project the Mayor should have thrown his "Tommy's Tower(s)" support behind as being "iconic" and bringing new energy to the city. You're replacing one of the ugliest structures in the city with Glass Towers that are actually aesthetically pleasing to most, opening up Congress St. and reconnecting the West End to Downtown. It accomplishes many things all while being a Green development which in and of itself is a "landmark" accomplishment. I just like that this type of project is being proposed in Boston because it's not just a building or two buildings, it's actually something that benefits the city and the area.
 
Re: Gov't Center Garage Redevelopment

"Tim Love, a principal at UTILE, which is preparing a development study of the Greenway."

a development study?

Wha?

tell me more please.
 
Re: Congress Street Garage Development

The Boston Herald says:

The Boston Herald said:
Panel: Government Center towers too tall

By Thomas Grillo | Wednesday, April 29,
2009

A Menino administration panel has raised questions about plans to replace the Government Center Garage with a pair of skyscrapers.

The Impact Advisory Group, a 12-member group appointed by the mayor to review a 3 million-square-foot proposal adjacent to the John F. Kennedy building, has told the Boston Redevelopment Authority that the project?s height and density is unacceptable.

Raymond Property Co. filed a $2.3 billion plan that called for demolishing the 11-story garage. In its place would stand two skyscrapers 42 and 52 stories tall.

But the proposal has faced harsh criticism over the height of the towers. Mayor Thomas M. Menino has said he?s unsure that location is the right place for a building as tall as the Prudential tower.

In a letter to the BRA, the panel said that, while the idea of demolishing the garage has support, the group saw no evidence to justify the towers? size.
?They want to extend the Financial District to Government Center and we don?t think it?s appropriate,? said Mark Paul, a North End resident and panel member.

Stephen Kasnet, Raymond?s CEO, said the Impact Advisory Group has raised legitimate issues and he welcomes their views.

?We?re at the beginning of the process to bring forward a project that?s acceptable to all parties,? he said.

The BRA acknowledged there are a number of issues the city will address in the coming months. ?We realize that height and density is an issue with the community and that?s what this process is all about,? said BRA
spokeswoman Jessica Shumaker. ?We will address all these issues as we go on.?

Article URL: http://www.bostonherald.com/business/real_estate/view.bg?articleid=1168711

I try very hard to stay apolitical here, but as long as this city calls such an opportunistic, provincial, small-time, ass-clown as Menino its mayor, we'll never be the "world class" city he spouts off about. The man's sense of urbanisism was obviously developed while prowling those bustliing Readville streets of his youth.
 
Re: Congress Street Garage Development

Did these people do something to offend Menino? Was it the independent financing, meaning they didn't have much need to kiss his feet?

Yeah, this is the type of project the Mayor should have thrown his "Tommy's Tower(s)" support behind as being "iconic" and bringing new energy to the city.

I was going to say this was actually a kiss of death, but Menino giving ammunition to the NIMBY Huns might be worse.
 
Re: Congress Street Garage Development

That's funny. I have never heard Menino say that the Hancock and Pru are too tall for their locations. I have faith that Raymond will say all the right political things to all the douche bags out there and they'll make it through. They can simply leave the garage standing, and I am sure they'll play that card when needed.
 
Re: Congress Street Garage Development

If I hear "Too Tall" one more time I going to start shooting!! Why is everything proposed in this city Too Tall! unless it's the mayors tower!
 
Re: Congress Street Garage Development

^^^ No kidding. Where's John Wilkes Booth when you need him.

It angers me how the mayor can decide where a "tall" building should be built when he cleary did no research. He should have known that the FAA would not have allowed the initial TNP height before he announed to the media that he wants multiple submissions for the new tallest tower in Winthrop Sq. So the FAA throws it back in his face, and then he has the nerve to say that the GovCenter location is not an appropriate location. I hope that the unions especially are lined up to help fight this one.
 
Re: Congress Street Garage Development

Indeed, about the only thing left in this city that is oversized, is the ego of hizzonah mayah menino.
 
Re: Congress Street Garage Development

Easy, boys. The IAG opinion is Menino's anchor to windward. Flats has been courting the nimby vote. Menino counters with this. Six months from now IAG will stand for "irritants already gone".
 

Back
Top