The development is taking about a third of the existing Chipotle building. I assume the same owner for all three stores, and if so, said owner is willing to covenant the other two buildings to preclude and future development that would go above two stories. Otherwise, I think this would be a high-risk undertaking.Some contextual mixed-use replacing the Sleepy's in Central:
Seems to limit development on the Chipotle and Supreme Liquors to something that maintains and air/light gap. Very contextual for Peter Quinn.
View attachment 8334
The development is taking about a third of the existing Chipotle building. I assume the same owner for all three stores, and if so, said owner is willing to covenant the other two buildings to preclude and future development that would go above two stories. Otherwise, I think this would be a high-risk undertaking.
"REATIL SIGNAGE"
During the meeting, a BZA member stated, "removing 14 units is a sacrifice I'm willing to make for the sake of avoiding a precedent of nine stories on Mass. Ave.” But we wonder, who is making said sacrifice? It certainly cannot be members of the BZA, as the majority of these members are homeowners here in Cambridge. If you don’t have anything to lose, how can it be a sacrifice?