This is a neat idea, and I keep thinking about the value of circle lines. But I don't really see anything like this working very well. Most of the stops are in low density areas with bad pedestrian access. In a lot of cases that probably won't be fixed because it's in a highway, which is not a good place to try to wedge in pedestrian-friendly areas. The stations are mostly not natural origin or destinations points for anyone's trips. That would mean this offers virtually zero one-seat-rides, maybe some two seat rides, and realistically nothing too much easier than a three-seat-ride (maybe bus to circle line to a subway). As bad as driving might be, it could still be preferable.So You Want To Build A Route 128 Transit Line
A circumferential transit line using 128 is one of those ideas that pops up every so often. There's currently almost no circumferential service beyond ~5 miles from downtown Boston, even in the densest areas. There used to be - streetcar lines and later bus lines along the section between Needham and Salem - but those gradually died out during the 20th century. Last night, my insomnia wondered what it would take to have useful transit at a ~10 mile radius from Boston.
Three things are clear immediately:
With that, here's my sketch of a full build-out, assuming automated light metro. Some combination of stealing lanes, running alongside 128, and viaduct over the highway.
- It's 128 or nothing. Except in Peabody, there aren't any circumferential rail rights-of-way. The local roads that connect the 128-belt towns are largely older two-lane roads that couldn't support much in the way of BRT-style enhancement. You could string together useful circumferential services from rail lines in 495-land, but not 128-land.
- Anything other than stuck-in-traffic buses is pretty instantly a megaproject. At peak hours, almost the entire 128/95 concurrency is slowed in one or both directions. The minimum viable service would be to convert the innermost lanes to bus-only; even then, you have to build some pretty substantial stations just to be reachable from street level. Some of the most valuable stations - transfers with existing radial lines - are the most complex.
- It would cater to relatively short trips. In most cases, electrified regional rail via NSRL will beat a circumferential line for trips along a large portion of the arc. The value of the ring service would largely be in connecting those radial lines to points a few miles away.
View attachment 60391
You can hit every commuter rail line but Braintree and three of the four subway lines. Three potential spurs to Lincoln Labs/Hanscom, Anderson RTC, and Danvers.
View attachment 60392
Salem is the obvious northern endpoint, though going through Peabody would either require a tunnel or viaduct through the downtown grade crossings.
View attachment 60393
I went back and forth on whether to have separate stations for the Framingham/Worcester Line and Green Line transfers. This is the combined station, which lets you stay along the 128 mainline and gives a CR/GL transfer, but would need a new park-and-ride built at the interchange. (The existing Riverside station would become a through station with less parking.)
View attachment 60394
This assumes that the Needham Line has already been replaced by GL to Needham Junction and OL to VFW Parkway. If you build the circumferential line, I think that justifies extending the OL to Needham with a new transfer.
View attachment 60395
Braintree can be reached either by a viaduct above the rail lines or by the Route 3 alignment. You could plausibly go for Quincy Center instead, especially if you could share tracks with the Red Line.
But again, I like this idea in principle. Are there some travel patterns you think this would be especially useful for? Or some stations you see as especially useful (or ripe for development)?