Development Map and Chart

HelloBostonHi

HelloBostonHi

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2018
Messages
1,320
Reaction score
3,082
Vagabond said:
So this is the exact opposite of a future development chart... but check out the new Leventhal Atlasscope Mapping app! They've scanned and posted all of their maps online to show an overlay. “With AtlasScope, we identified 100 of the most important atlases within Boston and its immediate neighbors. There are atlases for all over the state, but we decided to focus on Boston property and the near suburbs and within the times where we know we have the copyright.”

Description:
Click to expand...
Similarly, www.mapjunction.com has some incredibly detailed history of Boston
 
Gunner02

Gunner02

Active Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2019
Messages
283
Reaction score
1,343
10.28.20 - Also not sure where to place this but interesting, nonetheless. Haven't seen this anywhere but I could have missed it. #bancars among most will appreciate.

mass.streetsblog.org

City Unveils Proposed Designs for State Street in Downtown Boston

Crosswalks will be shortened, sidewalks will be expanded, and bicyclists will get an upgraded connection – including a proposed protected intersection where State Street meets the I-93 Surface Road…
mass.streetsblog.org
 
E

eddy2698

New member
Joined
Oct 22, 2020
Messages
39
Reaction score
28
Does anybody know how many bay village/back bay/downtown crossing buildings are currently owned by developers who have yet to submit proposals for redevelopment?
 
dshoost88

dshoost88

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2008
Messages
2,014
Reaction score
1,691
BBJ: Boston officials signed off on $8.5B in development in 2020

Aside from a month-by-month highlight of major projects, there’s this nice summary in the article:

The BPDA approved a combined 15.8 million square feet in 2020, including 10,123 residential units — of which 2,826 are income-restricted — representing a combined development value of more than $8.5 billion.
Click to expand...
IF developers succeed at delivering the 10,123 residential units approved in 2020 and the units house an average 2.1 persons each (roughly average Boston household size today), Boston would not only be on track for fulfilling its housing goals but also house an additional 21,500 people. And if the BPDA/City maintain the same rate of new development approval, Boston could, therefore, double the number of new residents it saw during the last decade, eclipsing its 801,444 population record some time around 2026-2027. Here’s hoping everyone keeps it up!
 
S

shmessy

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2010
Messages
2,831
Reaction score
2,587
dshoost88 said:
BBJ: Boston officials signed off on $8.5B in development in 2020

Aside from a month-by-month highlight of major projects, there’s this nice summary in the article:



IF developers succeed at delivering the 10,123 residential units approved in 2020 and the units house an average 2.1 persons each (roughly average Boston household size today), Boston would not only be on track for fulfilling its housing goals but also house an additional 21,500 people. And if the BPDA/City maintain the same rate of new development approval, Boston could, therefore, double the number of new residents it saw during the last decade, eclipsing its 801,444 population record some time around 2026-2027. Here’s hoping everyone keeps it up!
Click to expand...
Due to the changing dynamics and demographics post-pandemic, I think this will happen, not because of government edict, but because of market demand. Office towers are going to be taking a back seat to massive residential towers - - mainly catering to the rich or semi-rich, with government edict set-asides for some affordable.

Pre-2014, how many 25+ story residential towers was Boston seeing? How many since then? And the momentum is building.
 
Last edited:
C

curcuas

Active Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2015
Messages
703
Reaction score
580
shmessy said:
Pre-2014, how many 25+ story residential towers was Boston seeing? How many since then? And the momentum is building.
Click to expand...
Famously next to none, because Menino made it hard to build anything, especially if he didn't like the look of it; Flynn before him had a similar policy.
 
S

Suffolk 83

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2007
Messages
2,723
Reaction score
1,493
curcuas said:
Famously next to none, because Menino made it hard to build anything, especially if he didn't like the look of it; Flynn before him had a similar policy.
Click to expand...
I've heard this about Menino before- is there any literature that fleshed out the idea that Menino was anti-development?
 
dshoost88

dshoost88

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2008
Messages
2,014
Reaction score
1,691
Suffolk 83 said:
I've heard this about Menino before- is there any literature that fleshed out the idea that Menino was anti-development?
Click to expand...
There's a few books I've read that talk about Boston's development patterns and some political influences... not necessarily anything that explicitly states "Menino was anti-development," but contextually they illustrate city's historic development patterns, development during Menino years, and (filling in the blanks with content from ArchBoston) development post-Menino.

Suggested readings:
Boston's Back Bay: The Story of America's Greatest Nineteenth-Century Landfill Project. by William A. Newman and Wilfred E. Holton (2006)
The Hub's Metropolis: Greater Boston's Development from Railroad Suburbs to Smart Growth. James C. O'Connell. (2012)
The Heart of the City: Creating Vibrant Downtowns for a New Century. Alexander Garvin (2019)

I don't think Menino was 'anti-development' per se; however, I think it's clear that he and some staff under his eye could've made certain decisions under his watch that would've enabled more development to happen in Boston than did during the Menino years. To curcuas' point, Menino did make it hard to build anything. For example, in grad school I had the weird opportunity to interview longtime BRA Director of Planning Kairos Shen (weeks before he was very publicly fired from the agency in 2015). He spoke very candidly about how the office and how the city worked to extort extract as much value as possible from new development--taxable value, community amenities, new jobs, etc.--and how that level of oversight often meant that the City is a lot more critical about new development than you might see in other places. Specifically the city was incentivized not to change zoning code for larger development as-of-right because it means the city holds onto those bargaining chips with developers needing to apply for a variance. The obvious downside of this is that it artificially inflates the cost of building anything new in Boston, but the oft-ignored upside is that this strategy enriched the City's coffers with many more dollars/resources necessary for overall governance. Despite COVID-19, Boston's tax base has proven more resilient than almost any major US city because of how much it leverages from property tax value rather than fees, special taxes, PILOTs, and other means.

Although I think City development policy hasn't changed that much since Menino was Mayor, I do think Imagine Boston 2030 was a major step in the right direction for zeroing in on development goals and how to achieve them... it was the city's first master plan in 50 years.
 
Last edited:
C

curcuas

Active Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2015
Messages
703
Reaction score
580
It's great to say that at some philosophical level Menino wasn't anti development, but the permitting numbers show absolutely anemic housing growth through Menino's tenure despite a long economic boom and the end of rent control. The measure of "pro development" in a mayor is whether they let infill bloom in all corners of the city, not whether a couple downtown towers got built.
 
D

donkeybutlers

Active Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2021
Messages
149
Reaction score
201
curcuas said:
It's great to say that at some philosophical level Menino wasn't anti development, but the permitting numbers show absolutely anemic housing growth through Menino's tenure despite a long economic boom and the end of rent control. The measure of "pro development" in a mayor is whether they let infill bloom in all corners of the city, not whether a couple downtown towers got built.
Click to expand...
Maybe ending rent control isn't good for housing? 🤔
 
BostonUrbEx

BostonUrbEx

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2010
Messages
4,340
Reaction score
127
I love how the map in the original post on this thread is just a snapshot of the construction scene from 10 years ago. If I ever catch up with what's going on again, I promise I'll try to overhaul the map and update it. It'll probably take a while to get acquainted with all the new projects though. 😬
 
NorthshoreCity

NorthshoreCity

New member
Joined
Sep 9, 2020
Messages
60
Reaction score
339
BostonUrbEx said:
I love how the map in the original post on this thread is just a snapshot of the construction scene from 10 years ago. If I ever catch up with what's going on again, I promise I'll try to overhaul the map and update it. It'll probably take a while to get acquainted with all the new projects though. 😬
Click to expand...
I've been updating the maps for the greater Boston area for about the past year and a half on SkyscraperPage but their admins are pretty slow to implement building requests. I have a document prepared with about another 20-25 buildings to request before Boston is up to date but it gives a nice snapshot of the taller buildings currently proposed in the city:

Boston Skyscraper Map - SkyscraperPage.com

A database of world skyscrapers.
skyscraperpage.com skyscraperpage.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top