



It was an URBAN building for a Metropolis - - not the common glass, minimalist, sheen slabs of today. The Travelers Building was BUSY - - with the individual windows and detail - it looked dynamic, not placid.Love that building, both for its architecture, and the great memories of working there in the late 1960s.
Right on. Great description of business towers of that 1950s/early 1960s era, filled with optimism and energy. I remember when I was 17 in 1967, walking on Pearl Street, looking up at that building and being filled with optimism and hope for the future, my future in particular. Loved working there on the 13th floor at Cabot Corporation.It was an URBAN building for a Metropolis - - not the common glass, minimalist, sheen slabs of today. The Travelers Building was BUSY - - with the individual windows and detail - it looked dynamic, not placid.
I know it's not economical, but I love those buildings of the past that conveyed dynamism and activity.
indeed!Is 125 high st what was built in its place?
Atlantic Ave (near the junction of Cross St) ?Track work back in the day
“The folks at the Boston City Archives wonder if you can place this scene.”
https://www.universalhub.com/2023/track-work-back-day
And without all that high tech, where were the "slow zones"?Track work back in the day
![]()
“The folks at the Boston City Archives wonder if you can place this scene.”
https://www.universalhub.com/2023/track-work-back-day