"Dirty Old Boston"
- Thread starter theSil
- Start date
Charlie_mta
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2006
- Messages
- 4,369
- Reaction score
- 6,061
One of the first reactions to the new City Hall was: "Where are the gas pumps?"
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2011
- Messages
- 5,599
- Reaction score
- 2,710
Did we already see The Atlantic collection of 1970s photos?
www.theatlantic.com
Photos: Boston in the 1970s
A collection of some of the sights and events taking place in and around Boston from 1970 to 1979
www.theatlantic.com
The Cars down on Bulfinch Place at the WHDH building in 1978.... whatever that chrome sculpture thing is I want it
Hey, that's Ric from Auschwitz!
Last edited:
Interesting... didn't know the Mass Ave bridge had a ramp on the western side to exit eastbound onto Storrow. I'm guessing that left-hand merge into the passing lane was a kill zone.
F-Line to Dudley
Senior Member
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2010
- Messages
- 9,262
- Reaction score
- 9,279
Old configuration @ Union. The traffic island and tracks were massively realigned in 1980 and the out-of-picture Union turnback loop (seldom-used vs. Oak Sq. loop) was deleted. Which in turn was completely different to the current post-'99 traffic island setup after the tracks were torn out. There are pics on Nycsubway.org from the '80 Boeing LRV fantrip on the A showing the 'modern'-config Union stop, from back when service restoration was being bitterly fought in the courts.From the DOB Facebook page... the mystical A line at Union Square in Allston
Charlie_mta
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2006
- Messages
- 4,369
- Reaction score
- 6,061
What's even worse, before the Bowker Overpass was built, the ramp you're referring to also connected to WB Storrow Drive, into it's passing lane as well.
F-Line to Dudley
Senior Member
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2010
- Messages
- 9,262
- Reaction score
- 9,279
So was the cosmically tight turning radius of the switchback curve. Box-truck Storrowings used to also have a "smash guardrail / land on hillside / possibly tip over" competitive sub-division in this spot before the bridge's 1990 rebuild got rid of that exploit.
F-Line to Dudley
Senior Member
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2010
- Messages
- 9,262
- Reaction score
- 9,279
The weaving from the earlier-deleted WB onramp in that pic is so perfectly awful in a way that defies description. Also: holy shit is that a lane drop in the middle of the truck-flipping switchback?!?Well damn, I had no idea. This insanity is from 1955
Whoever decided to grant the MDC power/responsibility for designing high-speed roadways was a magnificent saboteur, I'm convinced.
Last edited:
Note there's a similar but better shot at the bottom of Post 163.
Poolio
Active Member
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2014
- Messages
- 358
- Reaction score
- 1,383
Well damn, I had no idea. This insanity is from 1955
Amazing, the ghost of that switchback is still visible today:
stick n move
Superstar
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2009
- Messages
- 11,197
- Reaction score
- 15,401
Sometimes I wonder how it would have been if boston went the paris la defense route and kept its historic core in tact and built its high rise downtown in like northpoint and cambridge or something.
Personally I think it would have been less interesting. My favorite part of Boston is that it is full of juxtapositions between the old and the new. The key is really to stop demolishing the historic stuff in order to put the taller buildings. That's why I think allowing additional height in exchange for facadectomies is a win-win for the city and the developers.
La Defense is ugly and much of Paris looks monotonous from pictures. I have been to Canary Wharf and think it's probably a similar feel to La Defense, banal and uninspiring. I prefer seeing skyscrapers seamlessly integrated into existing cityscapes, as long as they're not replacing the historical stock!