The outcome–obvious and transparent;
A great project turned into fucking garbage.
This should infuriate Marty Walsh.
Predictably, every possible ounce of visual interest and vitality have been bled form the concept. I recall criticizing the the initial design as "Bjarke Ingels on the cheap." The new renderings are so watered down, you can't even see the influence anymore. Another inhabitable massing model. Yay!
So, it came to the attention of the Boston Preservation Alliance that this is a really craptastic proposal... gnashing of teeth & rending of garments ensued.
https://www.universalhub.com/2019/preservationists-proposed-replacement-hard-rock
P.S. I'm all for BPA in the aggregate. But, to paint such a ridiculously overwrought and melodramatic depiction as, "[W]hen the most recent renderings were shown to our Board of Directors there was a collective gasp and unanimous shaking of heads," in an opposition letter, opens yourself to all kinds of ridicule....
"[W]hen the most recent renderings were shown to our Board of Directors there was a collective gasp and unanimous shaking of heads,"
It's a shit proposal... hard to disagree with the BPA in that regard. I'm not sure what can be done though that will satisfy them?
This proposal has gotten exponentially worse with each successive iteration.
The best and highest use for this site would be as a headhouse for the NSRL's "Central Station." I wonder if Santiago Calatrava will still be alive then... :-/
Oh god no please. Headhouses should be integrated into buildings or, at worst, take up some fraction of the sidewalk. Transit stations shouldn't be starchitecture.This proposal has gotten exponentially worse with each successive iteration.
The best and highest use for this site would be as a headhouse for the NSRL's "Central Station." I wonder if Santiago Calatrava will still be alive then... :-/