Everett and north metro Boston transit

Seems like abandoning that branch and leveling/filling in and widening the whole section would be in order versus the higher cost of widening an underutilized overpass.

This stretch was traditionally heavy industrial up until that literal last 2 residential blocks before Medford St., so there were no prior E-W street connections between Wellington and Medford St. The Wellington-Malden Ctr. ROW was grade separated sometime in the 19th century before all that residential density along Pearl St. and Middlesex Ave. was ever infilled from farmland. So the only missing interconnection here compelled by demand is that ped connection on the Medford side of the city line from Middlesex and the numbered streets to de-isolate Fellsway & Middlesex from the brick wall imposed by Wellington Circle. It's just a matter of sitting in wait for the Medford Branch abandonment, then building a very simple footbridge from trail's end over the lone RR track (i.e. the to-be-upgraded CR passing track) that sits atop the Wellington tunnel cover-over, dropping down at River's Edge Dr. with a new sidewalk added the full length of the southbound side of the road.

Pan Am isn't in any great hurry to abandon the freight spur, because they've had on-again/off-again negotiations the last 4 years with the Budweiser distributorship on Riverside Ave. for new freight business at their siding. Negotiations at an impasse because Bud wants large-size boxcars and the Western Route doesn't have clearances to send those north from Somerville, requiring a money-losing separate southbound freight job out of Lawrence for just a couple measly cars at a time. Parties have re-hit that impasse so many times that's likely as far as it'll ever go, but until Bud officially throws in the towel on further negotiation Pan Am isn't going to file the abandonment paperwork just yet. The cold storage warehouse next door to Bud still advertises rail service, but they're the ones who haven't ordered any cars in 6 years and are well past any expiration date where they can have their contract terminated for disuse. In all likelihood the spur will be there for the town to take in 3-5 years.


West-side embankment's always been there by Medford St. ever since the 19th c. grade separation, so the 1940's plan for an Edgeworth station at that location would've done exactly the same construction work on exactly the same side. Thankfully the industrial abutters on Pearl south of the Medford St. overpass are easier to negotiate with than the residential abutters who start north of the overpass. But it is what it is: a lot of retaining wall work to serve up the space, and no such options to widen out on the more constrained Commercial St. side because that CR passing track is a non-optional upgrade for Haverhill/Reading frequencies. Final verdict on viability of this infill is going to come down to itemizing the embankment costs vs. station costs, ballparking the tolerable minimums for the station cost vs. the set costs for the embankment, and seeing if that can fit inside a $60M-or-less threshold for the whole package. I'm sort of doubtful because that much embankment work does carry a pretty stiff set cost. But this bid for an infill sooner rather than later ain't totally over if they can drill further into the numbers, produce that detailed itemization of embankment vs. station, and wring any meaningful savings on the station portion to pare down the total cost. We'll see. Depends on if this study firm has the qualifications to dig that deep into exacting numbers.
 
Pan Am isn't in any great hurry to abandon the freight spur, because they've had on-again/off-again negotiations the last 4 years with the Budweiser distributorship on Riverside Ave. for new freight business at their siding. Negotiations at an impasse because Bud wants large-size boxcars and the Western Route doesn't have clearances to send those north from Somerville, requiring a money-losing separate southbound freight job out of Lawrence for just a couple measly cars at a time. Parties have re-hit that impasse so many times that's likely as far as it'll ever go, but until Bud officially throws in the towel on further negotiation Pan Am isn't going to file the abandonment paperwork just yet. The cold storage warehouse next door to Bud still advertises rail service, but they're the ones who haven't ordered any cars in 6 years and are well past any expiration date where they can have their contract terminated for disuse. In all likelihood the spur will be there for the town to take in 3-5 years.

Actually, even if you have a separate job served them entirely via Western Route, they won't make it past either the Mountain Ave or Clifton St overhead bridge. I forget which one it is, probably Clifton St, but you can look up at it and see a nice dent in the bridge deck beam about the width of a boxcar. Yup, years ago a freight was heading to Lawrence from Boston and they didn't realize they had a Plate F boxcar. The still didn't know until some time after a signalman checking a track circuit left on behind the train found the top of a boxcar on the tracks. I don't know what other clearance issues are east (north) of that.

So their best bet is to get the state to agree to (Pan Am sure won't) undercut the tracks at Sullivan Sq. Plate F's could at one time get through, but after a tamping job, the tracks were too elevated to permit Plate F's anymore. Then Pan Am and Budweiser can split the cost of undercutting at the Fellsway, although I suspect Pan Am wants to bill Budweiser in full. Documents for this were drafted at least as recently as 2015, with an alleged start date on the plans for this year.
 
Everett's one week bus lane trial started today:
Cy5_IasVIAAwkCw.jpg
 
I hope there are some big barrels, not just little cones
 
Has anyone seen any coverage of the bus lane? Curious how it's going but can't be arsed to head up to Everett on my way in to work.

Picture and quote from the mayor:


Good morning everyone! Well, day one of the Broadway bus lane pilot seems to have gone very smoothly, despite the dismal weather. We even got a call from a bus driver saying how great it was :) I do think it is going to need some additional supervision and monitoring during the week, as well as closer coordination with the T personnel. And perhaps some work on our traffic cone placement. I would also appreciate any feedback that you may have to offer, so that we can get the best possible picture of how this test is working out. Thank you, and have a great day!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
We know how that story ends, just look at Essex Street downtown. Bus lane, what bus lane?
Maybe it is time for "snow plow" cities to invent a barrier that's suspended from above. Signs over the center of the lane? Pool noodles?
 
Photo enforcement can help- NYC uses static cameras to enforce bus lanes at known problem spots, and San Francisco has cameras mounted to at least part of the bus fleet for random spot enforcement.
 
Photo enforcement can help- NYC uses static cameras to enforce bus lanes at known problem spots, and San Francisco has cameras mounted to at least part of the bus fleet for random spot enforcement.

How about static cameras plus real-time messaging telling the driver he's been ticketed!
 

Back
Top