Franklin Park - White Stadium Renovation

When I look ahead to a game at White Stadium, I imagine dinner from a local food truck on the lawn before the game. It will be very family friendly with plenty of space for the kids to kick around a ball, and I am sure the city will have many other concerts and events. It will be a very cool place to visit.

Sounds like a lovely small town event! I too enjoy those simple pleasures in small suburbs going to minor league baseball games, etc.

I’m sure that will increase the employment in Boston by several handfuls of jobs. That type of thinking sounds like the worry about buildings being too tall and casting shadows. The question is why Boston wants to scratch out infield singles when the situation is ripe for home runs? The NWSL is exploding in popularity and the average attendance numbers have already grown past the capacity of the planned White Stadium. That’s a very bad mix of circumstances for long-term viability. And, Yes, the team and its economic health are important to the City, as any local business would be.
 
Perhaps I’m wrong, but I would assume a fully BPS facility would afford BPS 100% access 365 days per year for full sports seasons - especially football. So yeah, that is a trade-off that makes access issue ‘less than optimal’. Compared to NOW, yes, it is an expansion. Is it “optimal”. By definition - No.
White Stadium will likely cost over $200 million:

The team is paying over 50% of the cost for the entire stadium and the 100% of maintenance moving forward for less than 5% of programmable hours. Not to mention $500,000 (increasing by 3% each year) to local organizations and initiatives in a community annual fund and up to $11,000 ($1 per ticket sold) per game directly to the Franklin Park Action Plan improvements, and the team will pay for planting more than 500 trees throughout the park.

Kraft offered a one time $750,000 mitigation fee to Charlestown on a much larger and more disruptive project. I think it's fair to ask him to pay more for the surrounding infrastructure (maybe more funds for SLX to Sullivan Square or a CR infill), especially when the White Stadium plan is set to deliver way more funding and community benefit than the Everett stadium. I'm a massive soccer fan and like to see both built, but I definitely think these are good and fair deals that Wu is setting up.
The team will be on the line with financed debt - of a moving target where the final cost isn’t being divulged - versus defined rental costs, smaller ticket revenue from an 11,000 capacity vs 25,000, less attractive location for dining/entertainment, etc - - sports today as a business is not “sports” - don’t kid yourselve - The Sports industry is one of Hospitality Management. Pure and simple. If you want to be a big league sports franchise, you simply don’t do it in the middle of Franklin Park. the chance of this franchise failing is unfortunately much higher given those issues……and if the team fails, that won’t be good for the entire area.
I've responded to you on this before, that is a skewed perspective of the state of soccer and it's stadiums in the US.

1. While I think we can predict that the team will be successful in the long run, it's not clear that they will be able to draw 25,000 (at least not consistently). The other new expansion team, Denver Summit, sold 15,000 season ticket deposits while we only sold 6,000. Denver by the way is playing their first few seasons in a 12,000 seat temporary stadium outside of Denver before they are trying to construct a 15,000 seat stadium closer to downtown (which is running into its own share own issues). 11,000 is the top half of the league in attendance and a safe bet, not to mention it will be much better for the atmosphere (have you heard about the Portland Hearts of Pine?).

2. If the Legacy moved into the Revs stadium they would not be able to leverage any of the surrounding developments in the stadium, they would have to pay a lot more for rent, and their marketing/branding would suffer because the stadium will be set up for the Revs. We all know that sports are about making money, they would have a lot more things working against them by being in the shadow of the Revs. Compared to no stadium, that's great. But every team will try to build their own stadium and control as much of the revenue as they can if they can. An example is Vancouver Whitecaps (just lost in the MLS cup final last week), who just today announced a deal with their city to move out of the larger city owned stadium to build their own so they can make more money. If the Legacy could build their own completely private stadium, they would. But they can't. So this gives them more control than moving into the MLS stadium.
 
The team is paying over 50% of the cost for the entire stadium and the 100% of maintenance moving forward for less than 5% of programmable hours. Not to mention $500,000 (increasing by 3% each year) to local organizations and initiatives in a community annual fund and up to $11,000 ($1 per ticket sold) per game directly to the Franklin Park Action Plan improvements, and the team will pay for planting more than 500 trees throughout the park.

Kraft offered a one time $750,000 mitigation fee to Charlestown on a much larger and more disruptive project. I think it's fair to ask him to pay more for the surrounding infrastructure (maybe more funds for SLX to Sullivan Square or a CR infill), especially when the White Stadium plan is set to deliver way more funding and community benefit than the Everett stadium. I'm a massive soccer fan and like to see both built, but I definitely think these are good and fair deals that Wu is setting up.
Even 50% of this stadium cost will still put it among the most expensive high school stadiums in the country.

With respect to Legacy's commitments to funding, I'm a huge soccer fan and I'm bullish on the future of professional women's sports. But I'm also a big believer that governments shouldn't do business with for-profit pro sports teams, because in the end the government seems to always need to pick up the tab. And I also can't help but remember that the previous NWSL team in Boston went belly up less than 10 years ago, and this one has already made some super regrettable business decisions that they've had to back away from. I wish Legacy the best and hope they're hugely successful and fully hold up their end of this financing deal. But I wouldn't hold my breath.
 
Most of those Texas stadiums serve a single high school, not a few dozen. And they generally do not serve multiple other sports, a professional team, and as a city-wide gathering space. This is not an apples to apples comparison.
Watch the video. That Katy ISD stadium -- most expensive in the country at $70 million when it opened less than 10 years ago to national attention -- serves a school district of 77k students (BPS has 46k) with eight varsity football teams. It also includes a field house with function spaces to be used by the school district and community, and to be rented out for private events.

If your thought is that "This is not an apples to apples comparison" then ask yourself: "why can't it be?" If $75 - $95 million is the going rate for one of the most expensive high school football stadiums in the country with all the bells and whistles demanded by high-end football-obsessed huge Texas school districts bigger than BPS, then why don't we just pick *that*? Why are we instead choosing to build something over twice that price?

If the answer is "because we also want to create a home for a new professional women's soccer team" then, well, that's your answer. But it's not about the school district or the kids.
 
Last edited:
Sounds like a lovely small town event! I too enjoy those simple pleasures in small suburbs going to minor league baseball games, etc.

I’m sure that will increase the employment in Boston by several handfuls of jobs. That type of thinking sounds like the worry about buildings being too tall and casting shadows. The question is why Boston wants to scratch out infield singles when the situation is ripe for home runs? The NWSL is exploding in popularity and the average attendance numbers have already grown past the capacity of the planned White Stadium. That’s a very bad mix of circumstances for long-term viability. And, Yes, the team and its economic health are important to the City, as any local business would be.
I grew up in Dorchester it's not small. I was thinking more like major concerts and such, but if you like suburbs that's good too. Interestingly, every sports team in this city has moved to a bigger facility as they have grown over time
 
And I also can't help but remember that the previous NWSL team in Boston went belly up less than 10 years ago.....

I don't follow women's soccer but you made me go down the rabbit hole a little bit. The last women's soccer team here, the Boston Breakers, lasted 11 seasons in a 4100 capacity stadium before folding in 2018. So it's certainly quite the bet that they'll succeed the second time around, in a significantly bigger stadium.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Breakers

I guess the key is don't have them scrimmage high school boys, because that tends to expose how inferior the product is.

Under 15 FC Dallas beat US Women's National Team 5-2:

Under 15 boys beat Swiss national women's team (ranked 23rd in the world) 7-1:

Under 15 boys beat Australia's national women's team (ranked 5th in the world at the time) 7-0:

I see a lot of people here are quite bullish on this team, but I honestly don't know how much of a foothold they can get in a city already oversaturated with sports teams. We have competitive clubs in all 4 major sports, tons of local colleges with their own sports (mainly hockey for popularity), and a terrible men's team ranked 1286 in the world, in a terrible league where the highest rated team is 292 globally.

1765504622120.png


Honestly I'm surprised we even support an MLS team given how low on the totem poll that league is for its respective sport. But now we expect a team to flourish that would probably lose 100-0 to that same MLS team? I don't know. As other posters have said, I'll be surprised if they're still here in 10 years and even more surprised if they can cover their portion of the financial obligation. I also don't care that much and think the whole thing is overblown as being anti Mayor Wu (I can't stand her for a litany of other reasons but this is kind of whatever).

I grew up playing soccer. Both my kids play soccer and I attend as many of their games as I can. But outside of that family bond I have never been to an MLS game, won't be going to these games, and don't think it's worth my limited time as a sports fan to watch mediocre teams in mediocre leagues when the city has so many better options available.
 
^ None of this is relevant.

It's all relevant. The first team failed, and the city made a huge bet on a second team succeeding in a city that's already oversaturated with other sports teams. It's not like they're competing with nothing here. They're competing for the same set of eyeballs as the Patriots, Celtics, Bruins, Red Sox, Revolution, and then BC, BU, Northeastern, etc etc etc. There's also at least some amount of relevance that a person who played ~15 soccer seasons growing up and has both children playing now still has zero interest in supporting this team (let alone the #1286 ranked Revolution).

How much money do people have to spend on a mediocre product that's worse than a good boy's high school team? The Breakers didn't fold in 2018 because they were too successful, that's for sure. The more I think about it the more I predict and absolute boondoggle. Save this post and get back to me in 2035.
 
It's all relevant. The first team failed, and the city made a huge bet on a second team succeeding in a city that's already oversaturated with other sports teams. It's not like they're competing with nothing here. They're competing for the same set of eyeballs as the Patriots, Celtics, Bruins, Red Sox, Revolution, and then BC, BU, Northeastern, etc etc etc. There's also at least some amount of relevance that a person who played ~15 soccer seasons growing up and has both children playing now still has zero interest in supporting this team (let alone the #1286 ranked Revolution).

How much money do people have to spend on a mediocre product that's worse than a good boy's high school team? The Breakers didn't fold in 2018 because they were too successful, that's for sure. The more I think about it the more I predict and absolute boondoggle. Save this post and get back to me in 2035.

I disagree with you about the NWSL. That league is growing steadily, has a good business plan and knows what they are doing. Relative level of play aside - the league has found the demographic key to its marketing and is succeeding as it hadn’t before.

The Boston franchise, however, doesn’t seem to be making competent business decisions compared to the established teams in the league. I am hoping the Boston franchise gets its act together. You put this team on an environmentally cleaned up (*at Kraft’s private expense - which @samsongam in post #362 2nd paragraph somehow left out - along with the fact that the stadium would be 100% privately paid for) Mystic River waterfront next to the Encore with new restaurants etc on a boardwalk and they will easily attract 15-20,000 spectators (big spenders and families alike) on a nice simmer evening. In the middle of Franklin Park on that same night? If someone thinks that will generate the same level of economic activity, then that is fantasy.
 
Last edited:
I disagree with you about the NWSL. That league is growing steadily, has a good business plan and knows what they are doing. The Boston franchise, however, doesn’t seem to be making competent business decisions compared to the established teams in the league. I am hoping the Boston franchise gets its act together.
Based on what data is the Boston franchise not making "competent business decisions" and if that is your opinion, what expertise do you base this on? We can go round and round but you lack hard numbers to back this assertion
 
Yes, all the teams compete for your eyes. I have seen 25 Bruins games, about 20 Red Sox, a thousand Celtics, a dozen Patriots, 3 Revs, 1 BC Hockey, 2 Northeastern Hockey etc. Rarely does anybody only follow one.

btw- the legislature changed the zoning for that parcel, thus making it more valuable by millions of dollars and the cleanup is not so great that you could build housing. If Mr Kraft still feels neglected by that then he should feel free to move his massively underachieving franchise to Hartford
 
Based on what data is the Boston franchise not making "competent business decisions" and if that is your opinion, what expertise do you base this on? We can go round and round but you lack hard numbers to back this assertion

1) “Too Many Balls” fiasco - you can google the ample recounting of this marketing malpractice
2). Team naming fiasco - another to Google
3) The sudden departure of Linda Henry Pizzutti from the ownership team (what’s the backstory there- did she decide to take up stamp collecting?)
4). Choosing to go into debt for tens of millions of dollars (BEFORE going in to actual business, without having any idea of the end cost of the stadium -who does that in today’s business?) on an undersized ELEVEN THOUSAND SEAT stadium.

You gave me a pop quiz, and of the top of my head I gave you an obvious four.

At what point does a reasonable person actually ask “Who is flying the plane?”
 
Yes, all the teams compete for your eyes. I have seen 25 Bruins games, about 20 Red Sox, a thousand Celtics, a dozen Patriots, 3 Revs, 1 BC Hockey, 2 Northeastern Hockey etc. Rarely does anybody only follow one.

btw- the legislature changed the zoning for that parcel, thus making it more valuable by millions of dollars and the cleanup is not so great that you could build housing. If Mr Kraft still feels neglected by that then he should feel free to move his massively underachieving franchise to Hartford

Who says Kraft “feels neglected”??? He just wants to build the freaking stadium and get on with it. Wu is throwing up the roadblock. If Wu dropped it tomorrow, it gets done. Are you under ACTUALLY the impression that the delay is because “Kraft feels neglected”????

And btw, the cleanup (saving the taxpayers the cost) is great enough that a stadium/entertainment/restaurant zone could bring in tens of thousands of people per night to a current empty industrial wasteland area along a river that has the potential to become a dynamic economic and recreational boon to Greater Boston.

But…….11,000 seat stadium in Franklin Park…………at at least 50% taxpayer ( and will definitely be more - and on an unknown final number) cost.
 
Remember when he threatened to leave? I am merely suggesting that his friends in Connecticut or perhaps a struggling second tier city like Baltimore might not give him such a hard time.
 
Remember when he threatened to leave? I am merely suggesting that his friends in Connecticut or perhaps a struggling second tier city like Baltimore might not give him such a hard time.


Wait - you gave me a pop quiz and I obliged and listed 4 reasons - - and then you respond with THAT? 😂

But there it is, right there in your moving the goalposts response.

That’s the Tommy Finneran line. The 1990’s was all Tom Finneran vs. Bob Kraft. Question: Who ended up providing greater benefit to Massachusetts? (And when did Finneran get out of jail?)

An unprecedented 6 Super Bowls for a franchise and region that never had one before him….a privately funded state of the art stadium on freaking Route 1 in Foxboro…..the only team in the NFL (aside from the publicly owned Packers) that didn’t soak its fans for Private Seats Licenses. And now the Gift Horse arrives again to offer a privately funded state of the art 25,000 stadium while privately paying the tab the state was facing for cleaning up the Brownfields on a part of the Mystic Riverfront and thus flipping the switch on a new economic dynamism.

But your post is illustrative - Go ahead and trade the ownership of the New England Patriots and their track record for community stewardship for what we have already seen of the Boston Legacy FC ownership over their first 18 months. That’s the recipe for success!

It is gradually shrinking, but that trope of Tom Finneran curmudgeon thinking,always looking the Gift Horse in the Mouth, is endemic to the area. It’s part of the character, and historically, has held greater Boston down. But things are changing - the Big Dig DID eventually get built and has benefited Boston’s economy and competitive standing (even more Important today, with a President hellbent on destroying Boston’s economy) despite the naysayers - and ironically, Mayor Wu (who I think is overall excellent for the City) is part of that change away from that mentality.

Keep looking Gift Horses in the Mouth. I’m done posting about this for now - we’re going in circles at this time and are at the point of diminishing returns. But this development will be (sadly) interesting to watch - I hope the fallout for the City and the Franchise will be as minimal as possible. As the Old Zen Master said “We’ll see”.
 
Last edited:
Watch the video. That Katy ISD stadium -- most expensive in the country at $70 million when it opened less than 10 years ago to national attention -- serves a school district of 77k students (BPS has 46k) with eight varsity football teams. It also includes a field house with function spaces to be used by the school district and community, and to be rented out for private events.

If your thought is that "This is not an apples to apples comparison" then ask yourself: "why can't it be?" If $75 - $95 million is the going rate for one of the most expensive high school football stadiums in the country with all the bells and whistles demanded by high-end football-obsessed huge Texas school districts bigger than BPS, then why don't we just pick *that*? Why are we instead choosing to build something over twice that price?

If the answer is "because we also want to create a home for a new professional women's soccer team" then, well, that's your answer. But it's not about the school district or the kids.
I had never heard of that one before yesterday, and of course you can always find an exception to the rule. I don't know whether there was controversy over that construction, or really any of those expensive stadiums, but generally when people speak of such things, they mean something like the Benson stadium in Ohio, which cost about $175 million in 2025 dollars, and serves a single high school. That's clearly not the same type of facility as the rebuilt White Stadium will be.
 
I had never heard of that one before yesterday, and of course you can always find an exception to the rule. I don't know whether there was controversy over that construction, or really any of those expensive stadiums, but generally when people speak of such things, they mean something like the Benson stadium in Ohio, which cost about $175 million in 2025 dollars, and serves a single high school. That's clearly not the same type of facility as the rebuilt White Stadium will be.
Benson Stadium opened in the 1930s, is part of the greater NFL Hall of Fame complex in Canton, has hosted NFL games for over 60 years, and is over twice the size of White Stadium. It's the football equivalent of Doubleday Field in Cooperstown, NY. High school games are played there, yes, but that's not its primary raison d'être. At the time its construction began, Canton still hosted a team in the professional football league that later became the NFL.

This is another perfect example of what White Stadium should not be. But still the $175 million you quote is less than the cost estimate for White Stadium. I don't want the City of Boston to be spending money on a stadium with NFL-caliber press boxes and locker rooms designed to host annual NFL games. I want a nice high school stadium no fancier than those across Texas, and those cost $75 - $95 million.
 
Last edited:
Wait - you gave me a pop quiz and I obliged and listed 4 reasons - - and then you respond with THAT? 😂

But there it is, right there in your moving the goalposts response!!! I haven’t heard that kind of thing since Tom Finneran.

There’s the thinking!!!!! An unprecedented 6 Super Bowls for a franchise and region that never had one before him….a privately funded state of the art stadium on freaking Route 1 in Foxboro…..the only team in the NFL (aside from the publicly owned Packers) that didn’t soak its fans for Private Seats Licenses. And now the Gift Horse arrives again to offer a privately funded state of the art 25,000 stadium while privately paying the tab the state was facing for cleaning up the Brownfields on a part of the Mystic Riverfront and thus flipping the switch on a new economic dynamism.

Go ahead and- trade the ownership of the New England Patriots and their track record for the ownership and community stewartdship for what we have already seen of the Boston Legacy FC ownership over their first 18 months. That’s the recipe for success!

It is gradually shrinking, but that trope of Tom Finneran curmudgeon thinking,always looking the Gift Horse in the Mouth, is endemic to the area. It’s part of the character, and historically, has held greater Boston down. But things are changing - the Big Dig DID eventually get built and has benefited Boston’s economy and competitive standing (even more Important today, with a President hellbent on destroying Boston’s economy) despite the naysayers - and ironically, Mayor Wu (who I think is overall excellent for the City) is part of that change away from that mentality.

Keep looking Gift Horses in the Mouth. I’m done posting about this for now - we’re going in circles at this time and are at the point of diminishing returns. But this development will be (sadly) interesting to watch - I hope the fallout for the City and the Franchise will be as minimal as possible. As the Old Zen Master said “We’ll see”.
If both teams were owned by Kraft it would make sense for both to play in that stadium, but they are separate owners with competing interests. Having your own stadium has been shown to be the greatest marker for investor success in modern American soccer, hence why you are seeing so many new ones pop up around the country rather than trying to fit into existing wrong-sized stadiums. The legacy is already reluctantly playing their first season in Foxboro. They are paying a lot of rent, they have limited sponsorship and revenue opportunities, and the vast amount of empty seats at Gillette will look bad even if they draw 15,000 a game (which is unlikely, I think they'll draw worse being so far from the city just like every other soccer stadium in the US). They are going to want to separate from Kraft as soon as they possibly can. Not to mention that having their own stadium gives them a lot more leverage against Kraft further down the road if they decide it's worth it to entertain moving to the Everett stadium.

There's a lot to speculate on with these private million/billion dollar discussions. To what extent was Kraft involved/supportive in the discussions for the new NWSL team and where their new home would be? None of us know that (although we can assume that the conversation was hostile given Josh Kraft ran on killing the White Stadium plan) and it's too early to say whether it's going to be maximally successful for either of party. If all goes to plan from the public perspective we're looking at two new fantastic sports teams in the city, a cleaned up industrial area (with a waterfront park), a massive discount on a world-class public facility for every child in Boston, significant investment into our largest public park which has been historically underfunded, and maybe more on the Kraft end as we near arbitration. As far as stadium deals go, this is shaping up to bring a lot of public benefit for relatively minimal public investment.

We can look at the larger trends in American professional soccer for business decisions

1. Right-sized, "Main Event" stadiums - I really don't think 11,000 is undersized. Only 6 of 14 NWSL teams average more than that. In the one case where you could claim that the stadium might be "undersized", KC Current capped their attendance at 11,500 for their new stadium and selling out consistently has been a wildly successful way to build buzz, atmosphere, and drive up high-end ticket and merch sales. Forbes estimates that they are the second most valuable team in the league despite being one of the smallest markets, a big reason why is that they are the only team with a purpose built stadium in the league. 11,000 in an 11,000 seat stadium where you control revenue/sponsorship is much better than 15,000 in a 25,000 seat stadium that you don't.

2. Mixed-use development around/close to the stadium - Not optimal, but not nothing. White Stadium is obviously immediately surrounded by the park, but to say that there is nothing to do in the surrounding area is ill-informed. Most notably "Boston's home for women's sports", Drawdown Brewery (9 minute walk) and Sam Adams Brewery (Ula Cafe and The Haven Restaurant in the same complex, 12 minutes walk). There are restaurants and more development coming in the next few years up and down Washington St. (Plan JP/ROX developments coming up now, 8-15 minute walk), Egleston Square (Dominican food, Squares and Streets Neighborhood, 6 minute walk), and developments planned but stalled around Green St. station (Evergreen Eatery is very popular as well, 15 minute walk).

Personal anecdote: I went to watch the Boston Half-Marathon in Franklin Park this Fall (easily 10,000 people concentrated around the finish line by White Stadium), Ula Cafe in the Sam Adams complex afterwards was packed. The local businesses and economy will see a lot of customers on gamedays, and future developments/shops/ restaurants will be oriented to the gravity of the new stadium. It's not a brand new neighborhood like these stadiums are often marketed as, but the existing neighborhood is pretty cool. Maybe I'm a little biased but it's a great area to spend the day no matter your age.

This is my estimation for developable parcels around the stadium. Some of these are already underway, some of these are entirely speculative.
1765556511824.png

If white suburban families are scared of JP, well they're not going to bring their kids into Encore to gamble or walk 15 minutes through power substations and future battery plants to get to the Davis Co. developments either. There is more available space for development in the long run, great existing shopping and food at Assembly (15 minutes once the bridge is built) and you can speculate on future developments across the bridge at Sullivan Square (15 minutes), maybe they can develop and relocate the MBTA Shops behind Encore, maybe they'll develop Gateway Center so it's walkable. So high upside long term, but short term I think most people coming to these games are more likely to spend time around Egleston Square and JP than the Everett industrial area.

3. As close to the city center as possible - Everett is closer, but not in a super meaningful way. They are the same in terms of actually getting there, transit and car access. Both 15-20 minutes from the orange line (the best line for CR transfers to the suburbs), great bus access (will be the case with SLX and BHA bus lanes), and no car access. If you are doing car drop off, there are more ways to get to Franklin Park and therefore less concentrated traffic (not to mention half as many people at games) surrounding the stadium. A CR infill right alongside Encore (10 minute walk) seems unlikely compared to one at Sweetser Circle (20 minute walk, much closer to the population centers in Everett). So you're going to have to do some walking.
 
Last edited:
1) “Too Many Balls” fiasco - you can google the ample recounting of this marketing malpractice
2). Team naming fiasco - another to Google
3) The sudden departure of Linda Henry Pizzutti from the ownership team (what’s the backstory there- did she decide to take up stamp collecting?)
4). Choosing to go into debt for tens of millions of dollars (BEFORE going in to actual business, without having any idea of the end cost of the stadium -who does that in today’s business?) on an undersized ELEVEN THOUSAND SEAT stadium.
In terms of the business missteps

1 and 2 - This was pretty much the same thing. Agreed this was a terrible rollout of the new brand pushed through by the higher ups before they had hired any actual knowledgeable marketing staff. However, I think they have made terrific business decisions since then. They have made a number of experienced high profile hires (CRO, GM, Team President, Director of Recruitment, Athlete Advisory Board, Coach etc.), brought on a number of new celebrity investors, rebranded with a great new logo and okay name, announced a new training facility in Brockton, and brought in a number of exciting young American players as well as a few stars including Brazil's starting striker who is a Ballon D'or nominee (awarded by FIFA to the best player in soccer). They've corrected the early mistake and have been on a roll making good sporting and marketing decisions, by most accounts Boston is much further ahead compared to the other expansion side, Denver.
3 - Yeah it looks bad, but I'm not sure how significant it is. She was a "limited passive investor", not one of the four major investors. And everything around her leaving is pretty speculative, I've seen so many comments about conflict of interest with the past Wu election, the stadium, and The Globe.
4 - This is just how professional soccer teams in the US work ( I think it might be the similar in all US sports but I'm not as knowledgeable). You put in a lot of money up front to get a share in the league (a franchise), and as long as the league continues to grow and make profit you get a share of that money. There's pressure on the lower spending owners to keep up, but at the end of the day it's an ultra wealthy owners club where they create competition on the field while ensuring the least amount of competition internally to protect their investments. It's an incredibly expensive long term investment and a lot of it is upfront. Before you can get to build the stadium, training ground, and pay operational costs, you have to pay the expansion fee ($53 million for Boston, went up to $110 million for Denver the following year, and $165 million for Atlanta a few months ago). If they were worried about money, they should've pulled out a long time ago. All the teams do this, some fail (see MLS Sacramento and their 1 main investor dropping right before stadium construction) but most that get to this point are successful.

So yeah there are some questions still, but if you are actually following the progress of this team and ownership group since "Too Many Balls", it's pretty positive. If you can see that the NWSL is a great investment independent of Kraft, then you should be able to see why they think White Stadium will be more successful. And you should be able to also see how Wu is positioning the city for the most public benefit. I don't think she's against the Everett stadium being built, just that she thinks there is more that Boston should/can get. Regardless we are going to get a resolution in the coming months latest so hopefully Kraft offers more ( to be clear, Boston has been talking about the $68 million dollar agreement with Encore, which I don't think is a fair expectation but I definitely think $750,000 is too little, especially compared to the White Stadium package) and it won't be held up for much longer. I'm rooting for them both to be built, they really shouldn't stand in the way of each other.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top