General Boston Discussion

Curious what people's take is on this article.

The gist of the article is that the President, a notorious elderly pedophile, does not like Massachusetts and his group of drunks, freaks, perverts, and apocalyptic Christian nationalists is punishing the state. So what should the state do? Become shittier to make him happy? Is that really the recommendation?
 
It should go without saying but Massachusetts receives one of the LOWEST (44th out of 51) amounts of per capita federal aid, investment, or subsidy of any state (DC included). The state is a consider “maker” state, producing significantly more tax receipts going to the federal government than it receives in federal funding.
 
Last edited:

One of the administration’s top priorities is focusing on street repairs, such as resurfacing roads and filling in potholes, along with other efforts to slow traffic and reduce crashes, Gove said. But he offered relatively few specifics on how the city is prioritizing projects, or what their timelines are for completion, despite repeated questions from councilors and advocates.

[...]

Missouri said the administration is reluctant to push forward projects that do not have an overwhelming amount of public approval.

“We want to make sure that we’re hearing [residents’] voices and finding the best solutions that are unique to specific parts of the city,” Missouri said.
 
Missouri said the administration is reluctant to push forward projects that do not have an overwhelming amount of public approval.

Interesting theory of governance here. I look forward to the monthly city-wide votes on BPS expenditures, BPD overtime, BWSC's road closures to repair water and sewer lines, BFD's loud fire trucks, the continued existence of the City Hall building and every line of Boston's 4 billion dollar budget that I personally do not overwhelmingly support.
 

Back
Top