General Infrastructure

TheRatmeister said:
There's a couple misconceptions (sometimes promoted by NJB...) around bikes, traffic lights, and intersections that I think are worth clarifying based on my experience.

  1. Bikes absolutely can cause traffic and get stuck in it if you have enough of them. There's one intersection I go through regularly (About 12 minutes in this video) where two very busy (during rush hour) cycle paths meet at a T-junction and if you need to turn onto the path that goes straight through, you might be waiting a while.
  2. Yes, Groningen has bicycle traffic lights that are green in all directions at once. It generally works fine, but I suspect only because everyone is already used to it. Rotterdam tried implementing it at some intersections and the results were much more of what you'd expect. I would not consider this to be something that could/should be ported to other cities. Even some locals agree it gets a little hairy at times.
Click to expand...
Thank you for the clarifications. Perhaps I fell into the game of telephone where some concepts get twisted ever so slightly and it turns into something slightly misleading, so these clarifcations were needed and helpful. Also helpful to note how bike lanes carry a lot more capacity than car lanes, so it only takes a handful of cars to cause gridlock, it takes more bikes to create a similar traffic jam, which most cities outside the Netherlands are nowhere near hitting that critical mass to cause bike traffic jams yet. While in the Netherlands, enough traffic is by bike instead of by car, so traffic signals there are more efficent and it's less likey there to wait 4 minutes at a red signal, like is necessary in Boston that wait times are very long to get through traffic signals. The time delay at red signals do add up signficantly.

1725926936332.png
 
Delvin4519 said:
Thank you for the clarifications. Perhaps I fell into the game of telephone where some concepts get twisted ever so slightly and it turns into something slightly misleading, so these clarifcations were needed and helpful. Also helpful to note how bike lanes carry a lot more capacity than car lanes, so it only takes a handful of cars to cause gridlock, it takes more bikes to create a similar traffic jam, which most cities outside the Netherlands are nowhere near hitting that critical mass to cause bike traffic jams yet. While in the Netherlands, enough traffic is by bike instead of by car, so traffic signals there are more efficent and it's less likey there to wait 4 minutes at a red signal, like is necessary in Boston that wait times are very long to get through traffic signals. The time delay at red signals do add up signficantly.

View attachment 55387
Click to expand...
Oh of course, bike traffic jams are quite rare an you need an incredibly busy intersection for them to occur. But they're not impossible, and if you get enough people cycling, say a 60% mode share like in Groningen, then they do start cropping up.
 
Delvin4519 said:
Thank you for the clarifications. Perhaps I fell into the game of telephone where some concepts get twisted ever so slightly and it turns into something slightly misleading, so these clarifcations were needed and helpful. Also helpful to note how bike lanes carry a lot more capacity than car lanes, so it only takes a handful of cars to cause gridlock, it takes more bikes to create a similar traffic jam, which most cities outside the Netherlands are nowhere near hitting that critical mass to cause bike traffic jams yet. While in the Netherlands, enough traffic is by bike instead of by car, so traffic signals there are more efficent and it's less likey there to wait 4 minutes at a red signal, like is necessary in Boston that wait times are very long to get through traffic signals. The time delay at red signals do add up signficantly.

View attachment 55387
Click to expand...
Just to add a bit to what @TheRatmeister said, the requirements for traffic lights is going to depend on traffic volumes and space. You'd need many more bikes than cars (by orders of magnitude) in the same amount of space for traffic lights to start making sense. If you turned all of Boston's car space over to bikes, then yes, Boston would need vanishingly few controlled intersections. Since you posted a picture of Comm Ave, it's hard to image how many bikes you'd have to have on that road before you'd need traffic lights. Probably all of Brookline could come biking down Comm Ave every hour before you'd need lights.

Surely there is some Dutch traffic manual that says when they think certain bike volumes start to require traffic lights. I'd be curious to see what that is compared to car volumes on similar streets.

For some fun examples, here a busy intersection in Amsterdam managing alright with no traffic lights.

Something I wish I could find more info on is biking in China in the last century. Through until the late 1990s, China had virtually zero private car ownership, but the cities were filled with bikes. Any pictures or videos you can find really put the Netherlands to shame. Huge crowds of people biking with no or minimal traffic control.

Conducting traffic, Beijing, 1980s
1725983405375.png


Rush hour in Shanghai, 1991

1725983467364.png
 
TheRatmeister said:
Oh of course, bike traffic jams are quite rare an you need an incredibly busy intersection for them to occur. But they're not impossible, and if you get enough people cycling, say a 60% mode share like in Groningen, then they do start cropping up.
Click to expand...
Off-topic, but here are photos of legit "bike traffic jams" that I took in China:

1726101087566.png

1726101100606.png


(Unfortunately, cars are still given priority at intersections like this. And unfortunately, most streets in China are much wider than this. It's a much more car-centric country than you may have expected.)
 
Was going to post this on the What's Going on with X thread, but not sure how visible those get, especially for the infrastructure part of this site.

Any ideas on what could be going on with the Long Island Bridge Project?

Last news article on it was that the DEP did not rule in favor of Boston's "repair" definition for the project, setting it back, which the Mayor of Quincy was seemingly jumping up and down out of joy: https://www.boston.com/news/local-news/2023/12/22/long-island-bridge-plan-not-a-repair-dep-finds-potentially-slowing-project/

This was almost a year ago at this point, and they had just posted a RFQ for a CM for the project about a year ago.
 
https://www.mass.gov/news/healey-dr...n-funding-for-dams-and-coastal-infrastructure

The investment demonstrates the administration's dedication to helping communities adapt to climate change. By restoring and removing aging infrastructure, public safety will improve, and local ecosystems will be protected. This will also increase resilience in coastal areas. The grants will fund fourteen design and permitting projects and nine construction projects to advance designs and permits as well as to construct the projects.

Governor Healy announced $14 million in funding for dam removal and dam repairs as well as seawall construction. This is a positive step for the removal of obsolete dams which disrupt riverine habitats in Massachusetts.
 
Last edited:
#bancars said:
Wasn't sure if there was a better thread for this, but the Cambridge Redevelopment Authority recently released its Grand Junction Transit Feasibility Study:

Grand Junction Transit Feasibility Study — Cambridge Redevelopment Authority

www.cambridgeredevelopment.org www.cambridgeredevelopment.org
Click to expand...
We've been discussing it a bit in the I-90/West Station thread, not really sure that's the best place for it but whatever.

It's... imperfect. It very much seems like they really want Commuter Rail service and the feasibility and mode analysis aspects were somewhat reverse-engineered to support that conclusion.
 
NHMaples said:
https://www.mass.gov/news/healey-dr...n-funding-for-dams-and-coastal-infrastructure

The investment demonstrates the administration's dedication to helping communities adapt to climate change. By restoring and removing aging infrastructure, public safety will improve, and local ecosystems will be protected. This will also increase resilience in coastal areas. The grants will fund fourteen design and permitting projects and nine construction projects to advance designs and permits as well as to construct the projects.

Governor Healy announced $14 million in funding for dam removal and dam repairs as well as seawall construction. This is a positive step for the removal of obsolete dams which disrupt riverine habitats in Massachusetts.
Click to expand...
Mass has a Dept of Ecological Restoration that has done all sorts of amazing projects. It really blows my mind how many things this little state agency has done in the last few years. Check out their twitter which is better than their website for reviewing their projects, in my opinion.
 
Morrissey Blvd. upgrade planning:
www.dotnews.com

Morrissey re-build cost put at $350m at high end; some ask more plan time | Dorchester Reporter

A state-led commission charged with accelerating plans for an ambitious and costly re-construction of Morrissey Boulevard called for its work to continue deeper into 2025 during a three-hour public meeting held last Thursday night at the Holiday Inn Express on Boston Street. Residents and some...
www.dotnews.com www.dotnews.com

Full presentation: https://www.dotnews.com/files/Morrissey_Meeting7_Presentation_11924.pdf
 
www.bostonglobe.com

Ted Williams Tunnel flooding a ‘pretty rare occurrence,’ but climate is changing, MassDOT says - The Boston Globe

Flooding that submerged about 400 feet of roadway in the tunnel Wednesday night was the result of a clogged drain that took about four hours to clear, a state official said.
www.bostonglobe.com www.bostonglobe.com
Officials initially thought that one of the roughly 40 pump stations throughout the tunnel had failed. They later determined that a clog in the inlet line, which was about 15 to 20 feet from the main catch basin feeding the pump station, was the culprit.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Arenacale said:
Morrissey Blvd. upgrade planning:
www.dotnews.com

Morrissey re-build cost put at $350m at high end; some ask more plan time | Dorchester Reporter

A state-led commission charged with accelerating plans for an ambitious and costly re-construction of Morrissey Boulevard called for its work to continue deeper into 2025 during a three-hour public meeting held last Thursday night at the Holiday Inn Express on Boston Street. Residents and some...
www.dotnews.com www.dotnews.com

Full presentation: https://www.dotnews.com/files/Morrissey_Meeting7_Presentation_11924.pdf
Click to expand...

Interesting. I do like that they all include a left turn onto 93 north, because I feel like most ppl that enter the circle do so only to go around it and back to get onto 93 north, so if you give drivers the ability to just turn left onto the ramp that should drastically decrease the amount of people either going to the new intersection or rotary.
 
Anyone know if there are any movements afoot to put Revere Beach Parkway on a diet? It's always been such a ghastly road to me, and that third lane seems to unnecessary. It could actually be a pretty parkway if they eliminated both 3rd lanes and put in some trees, but I never hear any discussion on here about this particular DCR deathtrap.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top