JeffDowntown
Senior Member
- Joined
- May 28, 2007
- Messages
- 4,765
- Reaction score
- 3,605
This is the classic problem with an unfunded mandate.I'm curious if it's the ADA proper or the state-level regulations on top of it. It sounds like the problem with rebuilding the stairs is that if they touch them, that would trigger the need to make it and that entrance in particular fully accessible, which they clearly haven't geared up for yet. A bunch of the Commuter Rail stations are similarly languishing as inaccessible because if they do any kind of significant touches to them, they'd trigger the requirements to upgrade to full-high platforms, which they're similarly not prepared to do yet.
They get shrugged off because the T only has so much money and so much bandwidth. The state's accessibility regulations being what they are, it's probably impossible for them to just temp-fix the stairs, they'd have to rebuild the entire station for full accessibility. (While the article indicates that's what they plan to do anyway, that's years off, they're clearly not ready to start that now.) It's the same with a bunch of the Commuter Rail stops that get basically no work other than basic maintenance because they'd trigger platform-raisings the T's not geared up for. I don't know that the T has the best attitude about these issues, though, which is absolutely a valid thing to criticize them for. It does seem like their default response is "oh well, sorry, we'll deal with it eventually", which leaves a lot to be desired. It's certainly understandable for them, stretched-thin as they are, to not proactively take on extra work, but that doesn't mean they shouldn't be better about a.) explaining why decisions are made the way that they are and b.) helping direct the communities so impacted as to where to direct their displeasure (i.e., I'd bet the T could speed up the Mattapan Transformation project or the CR platform raisings if Beacon Hill were to take some action to provide more funding and staff and whatnot to accomplishing those things).
The State rules that spending over a certain threshold triggers the requirement for full ADA compliance in the facility does not also come with a funding means to pay for the ADA compliance. So the T has to steal budget from other maintenance and capital work to cover the ADA compliance part. The big budget buster for most station upgrades is ADA compliance.
The stations need the ADA compliance. But if we were really serious about that need, the compliance regulation would also come with dedicated funding to complete the work -- not a perverse incentive to redirect maintenance and capital spending needed to keep the system running at all.